Census Moved To White House For 2010. Why You Ask? Here’s Why

Insuring numbers of advocates to push his agenda, Obama is making sure Latinos, legal and illegal are counted to redistrict areas as a “thank you” in his election campaign.

Ceclia Munoz, a La Raza advocate is already part of the Obama Whitehouse.

Now this:

NDN admits: Census padding with non-citizens to gain race-based power (“Latinos” meet in DC; redistricting)

Fernanda Santos of the New York Times offers “Immigration Tops Latinos’ Wish List at D.C. Meeting” (link), discussing a meeting held today in Washington DC featuring John Trasvina of MALDEF, Rosa Rosales of the League of United Latin American Citizens, and Simon Rosenberg of the New Democratic Network. As could be expected, it falsely assumes that those racial-power-seeking leaders represent all Hispanics (“[MALDEF] hosted the event, the second annual Latino State of the Union, a gathering of advocates, civil rights activists and lawmakers representing the interests of the Latino community”).

And, Rosenberg amplified the previous thoughts of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus:

[He] said that the Latino vote is now too important to be ignored and that might help speed things up in Congress, especially as congressional district lines will be redrawn after the 2010 Census. Certainly some Republican leaders are urging their party to figure out a way to regain Latino support that eroded during this presidential election… “I anticipate a dramatic shift in power toward heavily Latino parts of the United States” following the redistricting, Mr. Rosenberg said. “Remember: in redistricting, we count people, not citizens.”

In other words, Rosenberg wants to dilute the votes of U.S. citizens using legal immigrants and illegal aliens in order to gain political power. See also Should illegal aliens count towards Congressional representation?, “Under bill, illegals wouldn’t count toward political clout”, and Crooked Massachusetts Dems: count illegal aliens to save Cong. seat.

Note also this:

“[Trasvina] mentioned that Latinos have “friends in high places” in the Obama administration, like the Interior secretary designate, Ken Salazar; the Labor secretary designate, Hilda Solis; and the White House’s director of intergovernmental affairs, Cecilia Munoz, formerly a vice president of the National Council de la Raza.

And:

In remarks read by Tina Tchen, who will be the White House director of public liaison, Mr. Obama said to Latinos, “You showed how powerful you are on Nov. 4″ and that the appointments are “a measure of my commitment” of forming a government that reflects the nation’s diversity.

http://24ahead.com/ndn-admits-census-padding-non-citizens-gain-race-based-power

 

AGAIN….Where is the TRANSPARENCY Obama promised America?

Published in: on February 28, 2009 at 8:26 pm  Leave a Comment  

Obama’s Administration: Past History On Economy

This is a snippet from an article written by Noam Chomsky on November 25, 2008.

About Noam Chomsky:

Noam Chomsky is a widely known intellectual, political activist, and critic of the foreign policy of the United States and other governments. Noam Chomsky describes himself as a libertarian socialist, a sympathizer of anarcho-syndicalism and is considered to be a key intellectual figure within the left wing of American politics.

The article is titled: The Election, Economy, War, and Peace

As I read the article (trying to get all sides about politics) I happened upon his views of Obama’s administration. I discovered as will you, some interesting tidbits:

The Administration

Turning to the future, what can we realistically expect of an Obama administration? We have two sources of information: actions and rhetoric.

The most important actions to date are selection of staff. The first selection was for vice-President: Joe Biden, one of the strongest supporters of the Iraq invasion among Senate Democrats, a long-time Washington insider, who consistently votes with his fellow Democrats but not always, as when he supported a measure to make it harder for individuals to erase debt by declaring bankruptcy.

The first post-election appointment was for the crucial position of chief of staff: Rahm Emanuel, one of the strongest supporters of the Iraq invasion among House Democrats and like Biden, a long-term Washington insider.

Emanuel is also one of the biggest recipients of Wall Street campaign contributions, the Center for Responsive Politics reports.

He “was the top House recipient in the 2008 election cycle of contributions from hedge funds, private equity firms and the larger securities/investment industry.”

Since being elected to Congress in 2002, he “has received more money from individuals and PACs in the securities and investment business than any other industry”; these are also among Obama’s top donors.

His task is to oversee Obama’s approach to the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, for which his and Obama’s funders share ample responsibility.

In an interview with an editor of the Wall Street Journal, Emanuel was asked what the Obama administration would do about “the Democratic congressional leadership, which is brimming with left-wing barons who have their own agenda,” such as slashing defense spending (in accord with the will of the majority of the population) and “angling for steep energy taxes to combat global warming,” not to speak of the outright lunatics in Congress who toy with slavery reparations and even sympathize with Europeans who want to indict Bush administration war criminals for war crimes.

 ”Barack Obama can stand up to them,” Emanuel assured the editor. The administration will be “pragmatic,” fending off left extremists.

Obama’s transition team is headed by John Podesta, Clinton’s chief of staff. The leading figures in his economic team are Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers, both enthusiasts for the deregulation that was a major factor in the current financial crisis.

 As Treasury Secretary, Rubin worked hard to abolish the Glass-Steagall act, which had separated commercial banks from financial institutions that incur high risks.

Economist Tim Canova comments that Rubin had “a personal interest in the demise of Glass-Steagall.” Soon after leaving his position as Treasury Secretary, he became “chair of Citigroup, a financial-services conglomerate that was facing the possibility of having to sell off its insurance underwriting subsidiary… the Clinton administration never brought charges against him for his obvious violations of the Ethics in Government Act.”

Rubin was replaced as Treasury Secretary by Summers, who presided over legislation barring federal regulation of derivatives, the “weapons of mass destruction” (Warren Buffett) that helped plunge financial markets to disaster.

He [Summers] ranks as “one of the main villains in the current economic crisis,” according to Dean Baker, one of the few economists to have warned accurately of the impending crisis.

Placing financial policy in the hands of Rubin and Summers is “a bit like turning to Osama Bin Laden for aid in the war on terrorism,” Baker adds.

The business press reviewed the records of Obama’s Transition Economic Advisory Board, which met on November 7 to determine how to deal with the financial crisis. In Bloomberg News, Jonathan Weil concluded that “Many of them should be getting subpoenas as material witnesses right about now, not places in Obama’s inner circle.” About half “have held fiduciary positions at companies that, to one degree or another, either fried their financial statements, helped send the world into an economic tailspin, or both.” Is it really plausible that “they won’t mistake the nation’s needs for their own corporate interests?” He also pointed out that chief of staff Emanuel “was a director at Freddie Mac in 2000 and 2001 while it was committing accounting fraud.”

Those are the actions, at the time of writing. The rhetoric is “change” and “hope.”

http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20081125.htm

 

So Obama’s rhetoric about “Hope” and “Change” is supposed to be believed when he surrounds himself with the people that actually had a hand in our economic crisis today?

Obama’s connection to ACORN and it bullying tactics forcing banks to make loans to those who could not afford them, coupled with his economic team that also had a hand in this financial crisis are the “team” of “Hope” and “Change”?

The Messiah (as some in certain circles) have called him along with his “cronies” created this mess and NOW are going to save us?

Amazing……just amazing!

Are Americans lemmings or patriots?  Will we see some of the “masses” following the Messiah toward a cliff with big walkway signs blinking “Hope” and “Change” as they beat a path toward the precipice of doom?

Is Obama still using NLP to keep the “masses” in his control? (Right hand, index finger touching thumb as trigger), touching his index finger to his jaw, etc.  Remember Obama is LEFT HANDED. 

The Cloward-Piven strategy has started.  America had better wake up.

 

Home Mortgage Relief for Millions of Illegals

Home mortgage relief for millions of illegals


Obama’s program provides $275 billion to assist homeowners facing foreclosure

February 24, 2009

Illegal aliens can apply for mortgage relief under the Obama administration’s $275 billion plan, according to immigration experts and a group the government will use to help homeowners modify loans .

 

 

Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, D.C., told WND approximately 1 million households  headed by illegal immigrants acquired mortgagesthrough the beginning of 2007, before the housing bubble burst.

 

 

 

“There is no legal prohibition against illegal immigrants owning homes,” he said, “and in most cases mortgage lenders will accept a taxpayer ID or a Matricula Consular card issued by a Mexican Consulate office as identification to illegal immigrants from Mexico.”

 

 

Are you stunned the government plans to pay the mortgages of homeowners behind on their payments? Get the brand new bumper sticker making its debut on highways and byways across America – “Honk if you will pay my mortgage.”

Chad Buchanan, a manager at SaveMyHomeUSA – a group cooperating with the Obama administration that assists homeowners facing foreclosure – told WND illegal immigrants who own a home “could certainly apply under our program.”

“We don’t target or go after illegal immigrant customers,” he said. “But if an illegal immigrant owns a home legally, we could try to help them under our program.

[HOW can they own a home legally when they are "illegals" in the first place? Emphasis mine.]

SaveMyHomeUSA is seeking job applications for loan modification processors to work in the Obama administration mortgage modification program.

“A lot of mortgage modifiers out there never ask about the legal immigration status of the homeowner, and we do not ask either,” Buchanan said. “This is the first time I’ve had that question asked. All we are looking to do is to modify the current note, regardless what the legal immigration status of the client is.”

A mass marketed e-mail from Nicole Mercier at SaveMyHomeUSA tells prospects for the loan modification processor positions that the government “has provided billions of dollars to help people save their homes from foreclosure.”

“We are the largest loan modification processing company in the country, and we are looking for individuals, like you, who can help us process these applications, and also find those that are in need of mortgage reduction through this program,” the e-mail continued.

“You do not need a license or a certification to become a partner in this program,” Mercier emphasized. “The pay is a minimum of $600 per processed loan modification file. We are currently processing over 1,000 modifications a month, if you would like to become a business partner, call today.”

Mercier’s e-mail was posted on an Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, or ALIPAC, bulletin board.

ALIPAC’s president, William Gheen, told WND the e-mail from SaveMyHomeUSA “not only looks like illegal immigrants could refinance their own homes under the Obama mortgage modification program, they could also apply to become loan modification brokers, so they could help other illegal immigrants refinance their mortgages.”

The New York Post reported that in seven of the 10 metro areas with the highest foreclosure rates in the U.S., Hispanics were at least one-third of the population. In two of these areas – Merced and Salinas-Monterey, Calif. – Hispanics constituted half the population.

  The Post also reported that the La Raza Development Fund has received millions in federal funds to counsel their constituents on obtaining “no money down” mortgage loans.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89967

 

So now Americans that can afford homes and pay their mortgages on time are now being told we have to pay for illegals that took out mortgages they couldn’t afford? 

When is this INSANITY going to stop?

 

 

 

United Nations Secretly Taking United States Sovereignty. Americans Beware!

THE UN-HOLY ALLIANCE

By Joseph Klein
FrontPageMagazine.com | Friday, February 27, 2009

 

For several decades now, the so-called non-aligned member states who currently dominate the United Nations General Assembly have sought to convert the United Nations into a global governance institution.

The objective is to bring about what its proponents deem global social justice.

The arbiters of what such a system should look like would include a majority of member states in the General Assembly (many of whom are not democracies themselves), unaccountable UN bureaucrats, and unelected left-wing non-governmental organizations accredited by the UN to participate in its deliberations. 


These globalists demand massive international wealth redistribution to the under-developed world.

They want the General Assembly to have authority to issue legally binding directives under international law and wherever possible to displace the Security Council, which is the only UN body today that has any power to pass and enforce binding resolutions under the United Nations Charter.

They also seek to sharply reduce the powers of the Security Council’s permanent members, particularly the United States. 
The largest single voting bloc within the UN’s non-aligned group consists of the 57 members of the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC). 

They have successfully managed to appropriate the left-wing jargon of revolution against Western colonialism, racism, and oppression by cleverly framing their hot button issues, principally the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, in just those terms.

Already having turned the UN Human Rights Council into an instrument to harass Israel and to provide themselves with political cover for their own rampant human rights violations, the Islamic member states have called for a permanent seat on the Security Council to protect the Muslim world’s interests.

They also want major changes to the current veto power, which they accuse the United States of misusing to protect Israel from sanctions and other enforcement measures. 
The OIC has a Ten-Year Plan of Action, which includes a specific plank devoted to Islamic plans for the UN: 

    Participate and coordinate effectively in all regional and international forums, in order to protect and promote the collective interests of the Muslim Ummah, including UN reform, expanding the Security Council membership, and extending the necessary support to candidatures of OIC member states to international and regional organizations. (Emphasis added.) 

The Islamic and left-wing globalist advocates for increasing the governing power of the United Nations and for diluting the United States’ ability to thwart their agenda have found the perfect spokesperson to lead the charge.

 He is Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann, Nicaragua’s ambassador to the United Nations who is the current president of the General Assembly. 
Brockmann believes that the global perception of the United Nations is at the worst moment of the organization’s history due mainly to its “inability to call [the US] to order.”

Surrounded by a coterie of far-Left advisors including Noam Chomsky, Ramsey Clark, and Richard Falk (the UN’s special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories who has compared Israel to the Nazi regime), Brockmann has articulated an ambitious program that he wants to accomplish during his one year tenure as General Assembly President. 

He has taken it upon himself to push for radical changes throughout the United Nations system, particularly in the General Assembly itself and the Security Council where he believes there is too much concentrated power. 
Brockmann has called for the General Assembly to turn into an equivalent of a world parliament whose resolutions would be legally binding on all member states.

He believes that this body, which is made up of a majority of authoritarian regimes that includes virtually all of the Muslim governments, is somehow “democratic.” 

 

Brockmann also wants to enlarge the current 15-member Security Council and expand the number of permanent members, which are now limited to the five veto-bearing states.

 He aims to fundamentally change its governance structure to meet his concept of a “democratic” body that more closely resembles the one state, one vote General Assembly.

 And he wants to take on the current veto power of the five permanent members. Brockmann believes, in common with the Islamic bloc, that the veto has been abused, principally by the United States to protect Israel whom he has compared to an apartheid state.  

  
Brockmann wants to use his made-over UN bodies to combat what he regards as the principal source of world poverty and hunger, which he blames on the economies of the United States and other Western, free market democracies – namely, the “inequitable distribution of purchasing power both between and within countries” caused by “[N]eoliberal economic restructuring” and “a handful of multinational corporations.”   
Brockmann is particularly well-suited for this mission.

 He is a former Catholic priest whose anti-capitalist pseudo-religious liberation theology and service in the Marxist Sandinista government run by Daniel Ortega from 1979 to 1990 led to a public reprimand from the late Pope John Paul II. While foreign minister in that government, Brockmann received the Lenin Peace Prize for 1985-6.    

 

With his patron Ortega back in power as president of Nicaragua, after losing an election in 1990 and then winning in 2006, Brockmann has also returned to the world scene.

The Sandinista’s anti-Western jargon is unchanged, but the role model for defeating the capitalist West has switched from the failed Communist revolutionary movements to the more successful Islamic revolution in Iran. 


In the first week of his current term as president of Nicaragua, Ortega met with Iranian President Ahmadinejad.

Ortega told the press that the “revolutions of Iran and Nicaragua are almost twin revolutions…since both revolutions are about justice, liberty, self-determination, and the struggle against imperialism.”


Last year, while commenting on the financial crisis gripping the United States and spreading to other capitalist countries, Ortega said that “God is punishing the United States” for imposing flawed economic policies on developing countries around the world.

Apparently the divinity worshiped by Ortega, Brockmann and other followers of the socialist liberation theology is combining its retributive powers with Allah’s in order to punish us for our capitalist sins.

Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, a high level Iranian cleric, also described the United States’ economic situation as divine punishment. “They are seeing the result of their own ugly doings and God is punishing them,” said Jannati.

Brockmann, like Ortega, admires Iran’s Islamic-inspired revolutionary spirit.

Indeed, he began his presidency of the General Assembly last fall with a warm embrace of Ahmadinejad after the latter’s speech to the General Assembly.

Ahmadinejad lashed out against Israel and the United States and portrayed himself as the champion of the world’s oppressed peoples (leaving out, of course, all female protestors and other political dissidents in Iran who are now languishing under inhuman conditions in Iranian jails).   

 
In a further show of support for his revolutionary brothers in Iran, Brockmann said that the Organization of Islamic Conference’s nomination of Iran as its candidate for an open Security Council seat last year was perfectly fine with him despite Ahmadinejad’s threats to wipe another member state off the face of the earth and Iran’s flouting of three Security Council resolutions directed at its uranium enrichment program.  

Brockmann’s response was that “[T]here are members of the Security Council right now who have done things infinitely worse than Iran could ever do.” This was meant as a direct shot across the bow of the United States and as a purported justification for his plans to revamp the Security Council altogether. 

Thus, it should be no surprise that Brockmann has made it a point to include Iran and Syria on the first road trip that he is taking to sell his Security Council reform ideas to member nation heads of state.

His other stops on his six nation itinerary will include China, Bahrain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. 


And the General Assembly president launched his drive for inter-governmental negotiations to “democratize” the Security Council by appointing Ambassador Zahir Tanin from the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to chair this initiative.

Tanin is first and foremost representing the interests of the Organization of Islamic Conference member states, whose foreign ministers he addressed at UN headquarters in New York last September with a complete endorsement of their Ten-Year Plan of Action.

Recall that the OIC’s plan aims “to protect and promote the collective interests of the Muslim Ummah, including UN reform, expanding the Security Council membership”. 


One would think that transparency should be part of any process to create a more “democratic” Security Council, since such reform is a matter of public interest.

However, when asked if there was a need for increased public attention and debate around the Security Council reform process through greater openness, Ambassador Tanin crisply responded that the meetings are closed to the public. 

  
The alliance forged by the radical Left, globalists, and the Islamic states to infiltrate and ultimately take control of key UN agencies works best in the shadows.

This article and others to follow in FrontPage Magazine will strive to expose their stratagems by lifting the veil of secrecy and decoding the double-talk that permeate so many of their UN-related activities.  

 

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=048EF314-DF17-4258-B702-325FEF8CBB3B

 

Americans need to make their voices heard over the United Nations removing the sovereignty of the United States through different treaties.

Some of our own Congressional Representatives and Senators are working “behind the scenes” to head America toward a Global Governance.

Hillary Clinton, our own Secretary of State is PRO UNITED NATIONS.

Where is the American outrage?  Is it because the MSM’s are keeping this in “hidden stealth mode” until the changes are made?

Americans WAKE UP!  Vote to remove the United Nations from American soil!

The Shadow Party Part Deux With George Soros At The Helm

This article talks about the Shadow Party that operates within the Democratic Party that was started by George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold Ickes.  This article is from 2004, but has information that most Americans do not know.

 

The Shadow Party: Part II

 By David Horowitz and Richard Poe
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, October 07, 2004  

George Soros is an exacting  taskmaster. In return for his money, he demands productivity. What he requires of employees and business associates in the investment world, Soros also demands from the political operatives he funds. “Mr. Soros isn’t just writing checks and watching,” notes Wall Street Journal reporter Jeanne Cummings. “He is also imposing a business model on the notoriously unruly world of politics. He demands objective evidence of progress, and assigned an aide to monitor the groups he supports. He studies private polls to track the impact of an anti-Bush advertising campaign, and he is delivering his money in installments, giving him leverage if performance falters.”
By early 2004, the Shadow Party’s infrastructure had assumed a coherent shape, under Soros’ guidance. At its heart lay seven ostensibly “independent” non-profit groups which constitute the network’s administrative core. Let us call them the Seven Sisters. In chronological order, based upon their launch dates, they are:
 
1.      MoveOn.org

Launched September 22, 1998

 

2.      Center for American Progress (CAP)

Launched July 7, 2003

 

3.      America Votes

Launched July 15, 2003

 

4.      America Coming Together (ACT)

Launched July 17, 2003

 

5.      The Media Fund

Launched November 5, 2003

 

6.      Joint Victory Campaign 2004

Launched November 5, 2003

 

7.      The Thunder Road Group LLC

Launched early 2004

 With the exception of MoveOn.org – based in Berkeley, California – all Seven Sisters maintain headquarters in Washington DC. Testifying to the close links between these groups are their interlocking finances, Boards of Directors and corporate officers. In some cases, they even share office space.

 

For example, two of the Seven Sisters – The Media Fund and Joint Victory Campaign 2004 – share an office in Suite #1100 at 1120 Connecticut Avenue, NW. Three other groups – America Coming Together (ACT), America Votes and The Thunder Road Group – lease offices in the Motion Picture Association Building at 888 16th Street, NW.

It is tempting to consider that the clustering of these three groups in a building owned by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) may not be coincidental. The MPAA has long enjoyed a cozy relationship with the Democratic  Party; many high-ranking Democrats have slipped comfortably from government jobs into glamorous posts in the MPAA’s upper management.

 In March 2004, for instance, Dan Glickman succeeded Jack Valenti as MPAA president. Valenti was a Democrat lobbyist and former aide to President Lyndon Johnson. Glickman was formerly a Democratic  Congressman from Kansas, who later served as Secretary of Agriculture in the Clinton White House. Now, as MPAA president, Glickman holds what is arguably the most powerful position in Hollywood.

 

The Shadow Party draws much of its funding from the entertainment world. According to the Center for Public Integrity, Jane Fonda is the fourth largest donor to Democrat 527 groups and Hollywood producer Stephen L. Bing takes third place. The top four Shadow Party donors are as follows: 

Contributions to Democrat 527s

 Top Four Shadow Party Contributors                     (August 2000 – August 2004)

 

=====================================================

 

George and Susan W. Soros                   $24,170,000.00

 

Peter B. Lewis                                       $23,147,220.00

 

Stephen L. Bing                                     $15,382,555.00

 

Jane Fonda                                            $13,085,750.00

 

                       Courtesy The Center for Public Integrity

_______________________________________________________________

 

The last “Sister” to join the group is the Thunder Group LLC:

Thunder Road Group

From SourceWatch

Jump to: navigation, search

The Thunder Road Group is a consulting firm that serves several of the pro-Democrat 527 committees engaged in supporting a Democratic candidate in U.S. presidential election, 2004. The Group “will concentrate on research and rapid response.” [1]

“Democratic groups have created an operation that combines close coordination with a division of labor designed to avoid duplication of effort and maximize resources.” The other four allied groups are Media Fund, “the principal vehicle for pro-Democratic television commercials by the coalition”; America Coming Together, “which is responsible for get-out-the-vote efforts”; America Votes, “the umbrella organization that will stitch together the activities of various progressive organizations”; and Joint Victory Campaign 2004, “a combined fundraising committee.” [2]

Jim Jordan, formerly John Forbes Kerry‘s campaign manager, … heads the Thunder Road Group.”

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Thunder_Road_Group

 

The Thunder Road Group

Launched early 2004

 

Launched in early 2004, The Thunder Road Group was the last of the Seven Sisters to appear, but arguably the most vital of the lot. The Boston Globe called Thunder Road the “nerve  center” of the Shadow Party – its unofficial headquarters. “[The Thunder Road Group] is an operation unlike any other in politics, devising strategy, message, and public relations services for the 527s,” writes Brian C. Mooney of The Globe.[11]

 

A soup-to-nuts political consultancy, Thunder Road combines the roles of strategic planning, polling, opposition research (dirt-digging), covert operations (dirty tricks) and public relations. It coordinates strategy for The Media Fund, America Coming Together and America Votes. Its founder Jim Jordan is frequently quoted in the press as a spokesman for other Seven Sister groups.

 

Jordan is an attorney long active in Washington as a Democrat spin doctor. Among other high-profile assignments, Jordan handled press relations for the Senate committee investigating DNC fundraising in 1997 and for the House Judiciary Committee during the Clinton impeachment. Riding the whirlwind of Clinton-era scandals charged Jordan with a zest for what he calls “intense political, hand-to-hand combat.” [12]

 

Jordan attained his highest public profile when he served for nearly a year as John Kerry’s campaign manager, from December 2002 to November 2003. But, as Kerry’s poll numbers sank, so did Jordan’s power in the campaign. Kerry fired Jordan suddenly on the night of November 9, accepting  resignations the following day from other top staffers loyal to Jordan.

It was a full-fledged purge. As Jordan’s team left, Kennedy loyalists moved in. Mary Beth Cahill, Stephanie Cutter, Bob Shrum and other well-known operatives of Senator Ted Kennedy quickly siezed control of the campaign.

 New York Times pundit William Safire credits Jeanne Shaheen, national chairwoman of Kerry’s campaign, with masterminding the putsch.

On November 12, 2003, Safire wrote: 

“The Kennedyization  of the Kerry campaign was carried out by Jeanne Shaheen, the former New Hampshire governor. She prevailed on the candidate to fire his longtime manager, Jim Jordan, and replace him with Mary Beth Cahill, Ted Kennedy’s chief of staff. Cahill has impeccable far-left credentials, from Emily’s List fund-raising to Representative  Barney Frank’s staff. She is an ideological soulmate of the superb writer and Kennedy Boston braintruster Robert Shrum…”[13]

 

Jordan did not remain long out of work. Less than a month passed before Harold Ickes and Ellen R. Malcolm recruited Jordan to handle publicity and strategy for the Shadow Party – in particular, for The Media Fund, ACT and America Votes. In order to handle the growing volume of work pouring in from his newfound friends, Jordan launched his own company in early 2004. He named it Thunder Road after a Bruce Springsteen song whose lyrics declare, “It’s a town full of losers, and I’m pulling out of here to win.”

 

A July 27, 2004 article in The Hill  reports that Jordan had collected about $1.7 million in consulting fees and was drawing an $85,000 salary at that time. But what exactly was Jordan doing for that money? He is no mere press secretary.

Jordan freely acknowledges that his group engages in “opposition research” – the favored euphemism for dirt-digging among political strategists.  Some reports indicate that Jordan’s covert operations go beyond the garden variety of Washington smear-mongering.

For instance, the American Spectator reported on April 9, 2004 that Jordan may have helped stage-manage the media circus that disrupted the work of the 9-11 Commission, nearly bringing the investigation to a standstill.[15]

 

Even before Condoleeza Rice made her opening statement to the Commission, Thunder Road operatives began bombarding reporters with e-mails attempting to discredit her.

The e-mails continued for three hours straight, while Rice testified.

More seriously, the American Spectator reports that a staffer for America Coming Together said, “We’d heard that [former National Counterterrorism Coordinator Richard] Clarke had some help with writing his testimony and in prepping for the questioning. … The rumor is that he ended up getting some help from Kerry’s people, but indirectly through Thunder Road.”

 

Richard Clarke’s testimony to the Commission later turned out to be rife with contradictions and misinformation, as the Commission’s final report makes clear.

If indeed the Thunder Road Group helped prepare that testimony, then it helped obstruct an investigation of grave importance to America’s national security.

 Since Jordan’s firing, a new shake-up at Kerry headquarters appears to have put Clinton operatives back in the driver’s seat.

Mike McCurry, Joe Lockhart, James Carville, Paul Begala,  and other Clinton loyalists now seem to be calling the shots at Team Kerry. What this portends for the Shadow Party is hard to discern. Some commentators have questioned whether Kerry’s new handlers necessarily have the Massachusetts senator’s best interests at heart.

Given the Shadow Party’s evident commitment to running Hillary for president – quite possibly in 2008 – a Kerry administration would only get in the way. Certainly, the Shadow Party has a wide range of options at its disposal for subtly undermining Kerry, even while pretending to help him. Only time will tell whether it chooses to exercise those options.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=A0A6C803-D423-4CDB-A93F-95B495B370F2

Now add this:

New Democrat Network

From SourceWatch

Jump to: navigation, search

The New Democrat Network or NDN is led by founder and President Simon Rosenberg, “with advice from NDN’s Advisory Board, a group of leading New Democratic thinkers and strategists.” [1][2]

  • “NDN has offices in DC, New York, San Francisco, and Miami.” [3][4]

 

Archive of the NDN

  • http://www.newdem.org/
  • “This website contains the archive of the material of the New Democrat Network, a political action committee from 1996 – 2002 and a non federal political committee from 2003 – 2006. It also contains information from NDN PAC, which was a federal political action committee from 2003 – 2006. You can visit the New Democrat Network’s successor organization, NDN at www.ndn.org, NDN’s think tank for politics, New Politics Institute at www.newpolitics.net and NDN’s Blog at www.ndnblog.org.” [8]

 

From New Democratic Network to NDN

The New Democratic Network officially became NDN in 2005. In August 2005, a study of the current NDN website, ndn.org, to which ndndem.org now redirects, did not reveal the words behind the acronym. A search of the website for “Democrat” yielded only:

  • many members of the Advisory Board are long-time Democratic Party political operatives [9]. Whether this operation serves as a front or other affiliate of the Democratic Party coopting independents and “the progressive community”, or demonstrates a non-partisan independence from the existing bi-partisan duopoly, remains to be demonstrated. The whois database record names “New Directions for News” as the registrant. See this topic’s Talk section.

 

Mission in 2008

A visit to the NDN website in February, 2008 finds this mission: “NDN is a progressive think tank and advocacy organization.

NDN’s work is organized around a powerful idea – that for progressives to succeed in the 21st century as they did in the 20th, they will have to do three things: offer a new governing agenda that speaks to the challenges of our day; master the new media and technology tools that are changing the way we all communicate and advocate; and understand and speak to the radically new demographic make-up of today’s America.

NDN’s staff, Fellows and collaborators offer fresh and original thinking in these three main areas of focus: new governing agenda, new media and technology and new demography. … You may also want to learn more about our affiliate the New Politics Institute, our think tank for politics, and review our recent article, “The 50 Year Strategy”, that lays out a big vision for progressive success in the years ahead.” [10]

 

NDN Founders Senior Staff

 

Advisory Board

 

The Coalition

The NDN, “a coalition member, plans a separate $5 million television campaign aimed at Latino voters in four states.” [11]

The “coalition” is comprised of five allied Democrat groups: Media Fund, “the principal vehicle for pro-Democratic television commercials by the coalition”; America Coming Together, “which is responsible for get-out-the-vote efforts”; America Votes, “the umbrella organization that will stitch together the activities of various progressive organizations”; Joint Victory Campaign 2004, “a combined fundraising committee”; and the Thunder Road Group.”

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=New_Democrat_Network#Advisory_Board

http://www.newpolitics.net/

 

George Soros and the NDN: An interactive map of connections to George Soros

VERY INFORMATIVE!

http://www.muckety.com/Query?SearchResult=4166&SearchResult=5041144&graph=MucketyMap?_r=2D

 

 

 

What the MSM’s Have Failed To Show Union Workers: Labor Imperialism, Corporate Unionism & The SEIU Convention in Puerto Rico

Is Andy Stern, the President of the SEIU and an invitee to Obama’s recent Financial Responsibility Summit at the White House working on possible Corporate Unionism and Labor Imperialism?

A video that Union members should watch:

 

Is this why the UHW are currently fighting within the SEIU?

Totalitarianism? Join and just be “rank and file” members?  NO VOICE?  NO VOTE?

Why are the MSM’s hiding this?

 

Besides House Democrats Claiming “We Won” They Now Think They are Untouchable and Above The Law?

House Kills Effort to Investigate Lobbyist-Lawmaker Ties

The proposal would have forced the House Ethics Committee to launch a probe into ties between the source and timing of campaign contributions by lobbyists and subsequent legislator requests for special projects or earmarks.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The House voted Wednesday to kill a resolution calling for an ethics investigation into potential quid pro quo between lobbyist campaign donations and lawmakers.

Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., sponsored the proposal that would have forced the House Ethics Committee to launch a probe into ties between the source and timing of campaign contributions by lobbyists and subsequent legislator requests for special projects or earmarks.

While open-ended, Flake’s resolution was a direct response to the ongoing federal investigation into the PMA Group, a lobbying company accused of making fraudulent donations to lawmakers using names of people who did not exist.  [This kind of sounds like ACORN's policies, huh? Emphasis mine]

The firm, which has contributed millions to politicians in the last decade, has close ties to senior Democratic appropriators including Reps. John Murtha D-Pa., and Pete Visclosky,D-Ind.

The FBI raided PMA’s headquarters in November and is investigating the group’s founder and president, Paul Magliochetti, a former Murtha aide.

“Whereas numerous press reports and editorials have alleged several cases of influence peddling between members of Congress and outside interests seeking federal funding…the House of Representatives should respond to such claims and demonstrate integrity in its proceedings,” the resolution read.

The House decided to set aside the proposal by a mostly party-line 226-182 vote, though 17 Democrats joined Republicans in support of considering the measure.

The vote came just after the House approved a $410 billion spending to fund the government this year, which also contained $8.8 million on projects sought by client of the PMA lobbying group.

“Our own ethics committee may say that’s OK. The Department of Justice may see it another way,” Flake said following the vote. “Until we bring our Ethics Committee guidelines in line with the Justice Department, our members are exposed.”

Asked why he voted with the majority to table the resolution,  Murtha said, “no comment. “

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/25/house-kills-effort-investigate-lobbyist-lawmaker-ties/

Where is the “Truth” and “Transparency” in our Government that Speaker Pelosi Promised?

Is this another example of “Do as I say, not as I do”?

Since when are our House of Representatives in Congress……ABOVE THE LAW?

Corruption at its finest!

 

Radical Democrats Chipping Away At United States Sovereignty! Americans Beware!

United Nations Millenium Development Goals
http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

 

United Nations Sovereignty of the Seas Treaty
Another way the New International Economic Order has been described is “redistributionist.”

The Law of the Sea Treaty calls for technology transfers and wealth transfers from developed to undeveloped nations. It also requires parties to the treaty to adopt regulations and laws to control pollution of the marine environment. Such provisions were among the reasons President Ronald Reagan rejected the treaty in 1982. As Edwin Meese, U.S. Attorney General under President Reagan, explained recently, “…it was out of step with the concepts of economic liberty and free enterprise that Ronald Reagan was to inspire throughout the world.”

In additional to the economic provisions, the treaty also establishes specific jurisdictional limits on the ocean area that countries may claim, including a 12-mile territorial sea limit and a 200-mile exclusive economic zone limit.
http://www.unlawoftheseatreaty.org/

 

United Nations Global Poverty Act [Obama's own bill S.2433]

A nice-sounding bill called the “Global Poverty Act,” sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.   

Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has not endorsed either Senator Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. But on Thursday, February 14, he is trying to rush Obama’s “Global Poverty Act” (S.2433) through his committee. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends.   

The bill, which is item number four on the committee’s business meeting agenda, passed the House by a voice vote last year because most members didn’t realize what was in it. Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require. According to the website of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, no hearings have been held on the Obama bill in that body.   

A release from the Obama Senate office about the bill declares, “In 2000, the U.S. joined more than 180 countries at the United Nations Millennium Summit and vowed to reduce global poverty by 2015. We are halfway towards this deadline, and it is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day.”

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-global-tax-proposal-up-for-senate-vote/

 

NOW THIS:

Boxer Seeks to Ratify U.N. Treaty That May Erode U.S. Rights

Sen. Barbara Boxer is pushing the Obama administration to move forward with ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a controversial treaty that has never gained much support in the U.S.

Sen. Barbara Boxer is urging the U.S. to ratify a United Nations measure meant to expand the rights of children, a move critics are calling a gross assault on parental rights that could rob the U.S. of sovereignty.

The California Democrat is pushing the Obama administration to review the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a nearly 20-year-old international agreement that has been foundering on American shores since it was signed by the Clinton administration in 1995 but never ratified.

Critics say the treaty, which creates “the right of the child to freedom of thought, conscience and religion” and outlaws the “arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy,” intrudes on the family and strips parents of the power to raise their children without government interference.

Nearly every country in the world is party to it — only the U.S. and Somalia are not — but the convention has gained little support in the U.S. and never been sent to the Senate for ratification.

That could change soon.

Boxer has made clear her intent to revive the ratification process under the Obama administration, which may be amenable to the move. During a Senate confirmation hearing last month, Boxer said she considers it “a humiliation” that the U.S. is “standing with Somalia” in refusing to become party to the agreement, while 193 other nations have led the way.

The U.S. is already party to two optional pieces of the treaty regarding child soldiers and child prostitution and pornography, but has refused to sign on to the full agreement, something which has rankled members of Congress, including Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.[An "open" Socialist in Congress and part of the Congressional Progressive Caucus]

“Children deserve basic human rights … and the convention protects children’s rights by setting some standards here so that the most vulnerable people of society will be protected,” Boxer said.

The convention has established a Committee on the Rights of the Child, an 18-member panel in Geneva composed of “persons of high moral character” who review the rights of children in nations that are party to the convention.

But legal experts say the convention does nothing to protect human rights abroad — and that acceding to the convention would erode U.S. sovereignty.

Because of the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the Constitution, all treaties are rendered “the supreme law of the land,” superseding preexisting state and federal statutes. Any rights or laws established by the U.N. convention could then be argued to hold sway in the United States.

“To the extent that an outside body, a group of unaccountable so-called experts in Switzerland have a say over how children in America should be raised, educated and disciplined — that is an erosion of American sovereignty,” said Steven Groves, a fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

Parental rights groups are similarly stirred; they see in the U.N. convention a threat that the government will meddle with even the simplest freedoms to raise their children as they see fit.

“Whether you ground your kids for smoking marijuana, whether you take them to church, whether you let them go to junior prom, all of those things . . . will be the government’s decision,” said Michael Farris, president of ParentalRights.org. “It will affect every parent who’s told their children to do the dishes.”

Groves said that erosion has already begun, as the Supreme Court has referred to the wide acceptance of the child-rights law in conferring legal protections on minors in the U.S.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing the majority opinion in the 2005 decision banning the death penalty for minors, noted that “every country in the world has ratified [the convention] save for the United States and Somalia.”

Proponents of the convention in the U.S. stress that it will help secure human rights abroad.

“Now, all you have to do is look around the world and see these girls that are having acid thrown in their face,” Boxer said in January, implying that the U.S. refusal to come aboard has led to abuses elsewhere.

But when acceding to the convention, countries are able to sign so-called RUDs — reservations, understandings and declarations — that can hinder or negate responsibilities they would otherwise be bound to follow.

Most majority Muslim nations express reservations on all provisions of the convention that are incompatible with Islamic Sharia law, which takes much of the teeth out of the treaty. Acid attacks on girls continue in Afghanistan, which is already party to the convention.

The U.N. itself admits that there is no way for it to enforce its own laws and protect children.

“When it comes to signatories who violate the convention and/or its optional protocols — there is no means to oblige states to fulfill their legal obligations,” said Giorgia Passarelli, a spokeswoman for the U.N. High Commission on Human Rights, which oversees the child-rights body.

Passarelli said that the committee has kept a constant spotlight on rights violators and fed into decisions made by the Security Council, especially involving child soldiers. But even then, she added, such pressure does not always prevail.

Despite these obstacles, Boxer has made clear that she intends to ramp up pressure to get the treaty ratified, a passion that may be shared by the Obama administration.

During the Oct. 22, 2008, presidential youth debate, Obama promised to “review this and other treaties to ensure the United States resumes its global leadership in human rights.”

During U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s January confirmation hearing, Rice called the convention “a very important treaty and a noble cause,” and said it was “a shame” for the U.S. to be in company with Somalia, which has no real government.
Rice told Boxer that “there can be no doubt that [President Obama] and Secretary Clinton and I share a commitment to the objectives of this treaty and will take it up as an early question,” promising to review the treaty “to ensure that the United States is playing and resumes its global leadership role in human rights.”

Boxer, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, pushed for a 60-day timetable to review the convention and report back to the Senate — which would have left the Obama administration a March 23 deadline to move toward ratification.

Rice politely sidestepped and refused to agree to the timeline.

“This is a complicated treaty, in many respects more than some others, given our system of federalism, and so we need to take a close look at how we manage the challenges of domestic implementation and what reservations and understandings might be appropriate in the context of ratification,” she said.

Boxer’s office, which ignored repeated calls and e-mails seeking comment, has not spelled out what if any reservations the senator would like to assert in ratifying the treaty. The State Department also refused to comment on timetables.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/25/boxer-seeks-ratify-treaty-erode-rights/

George Soros

Founder and Chairman
Open Society Institute

A global financier and philanthropist, George Soros is the founder and chairman of a network of foundations that promote, among other things, the creation of open, democratic societies based upon the rule of law, market economies, transparent and accountable governance, freedom of the press, and respect for human rights.

 

Philosophy

At the London School of Economics, Soros became acquainted with the work of the philosopher Karl Popper, whose ideas on open society had a profound influence on his intellectual development.

 Specifically, Soros’s experience of Nazi and Communist rule attracted him to Popper’s critique of totalitarianism, The Open Society and Its Enemies, in which he maintained that societies can only flourish when they allow democratic governance, freedom of expression, a diverse range of opinion, and respect for individual rights.

 

Philanthropy

As his financial success mounted, Soros applied his wealth to help foster the development of open societies.

The magnitude and geographical scope of his philanthropic commitments, coupled with the core principle of fostering open societies, has allowed Soros to transcend the limitations of many national governments and international institutions.

In 1993, Soros created the Open Society Institute, which supports the Soros foundations working to develop democratic institutions throughout Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. His network of philanthropic organizations dedicated to building open societies has expanded to include more than 60 countries in the Middle East, Central Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Despite the breadth of his endeavors, Soros is personally involved in planning and implementing many of the foundation network’s projects.

http://www.soros.org/about/bios/a_soros

A speech introduction given by George Soros:

Europe as a Prototype for a Global Open Society

OSI

George Soros

November 20, 2006

 The following talk was delivered at the European Policy Centre in Brussels. George Soros is founder and chairman of the Open Society Institute.

Europe is in search of its identity. I don’t think one needs to look very far. To my mind, the European Union embodies the principles of an open society and it ought to serve as a model and motive force for a global open society. 

http://www.soros.org/resources/articles_publications/articles/europe_20061120

 

Is this what Al Gore was talking about at the Environmental speech to children recently when he said basically don’t listen to your parents; they don’t know anything?

Are we headed head first into the likes of China? They “pick” children at an early age that show promise in athletics, math, science, etc. and take them away from the parents to be raise in government institutes?

Obama has only been in office for just over 30 days and he has created a “whirlpool” in Washington and it has only gained momentum. The Cloward -Piven strategy has begun and if America does not wake up and STAND UP, we will be at a precipice of governmental “conversion”……

The United States Consitution is being challenged……our sovereignty is being challenged.

Where the HECK is our Supreme Court? Are they being bound and gagged by their own fears? They are supposed to be the protectors of our Constitution!

America! YOU are being herded into a “National stockyard” of sorts!

And you silly people thought that former President George Bush was trying to build a North American Union!

How about someone changing the sovereignty of the United States to belong to a GLOBAL “one state” world?

Could GEORGE SOROS be behind this?….I have said this ALL ALONG! He bought the Obama presidency through his financial slight of hand.

The OPEN SOCIETY that George Soros is involved with dreams of a world with NO BORDERS, free love, free drugs, etc.

Beware America. Is the “beast” in the book of Revelations upon us?

Is George Soros the Anti-Christ?

Read About the Democracy Alliance I blogged about recently about pulling the financial strings behind the Democratic Party…..the “Shadow Party” (created by George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold Ickes) within the Democratic Party.

Is George Soros the Puppetmaster? Is Obama his puppet? Hillary Clinton in the position of Secreatary of State is EXACTLY where George Soros wants her to be……a PRO-UNITED NATIONS Secretary of State…..how convenient!

Another Lobbyist Set to Join Obama’s Administration

Another Lobbyist Set to Join Administration

By Don | February 22, 2009

Obama’s nominee for U.S. Trade Representative squeezes through lobbying loophole.

From ABC News’ Jake Tapper

On first blush, Ron Kirk, the former mayor of Dallas and President Obama’s nominee for U.S. Trade Representative, could seem as though he has an enormous impediment standing in his way to the Cabinet: President Obama’s high standards against lobbyists in his Cabinet.

As recently as last year, Kirk was a lobbyist for investment bank Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and President Obama has said no one can work in his administration on issues they lobbied on in the previous two years.

Given the vast array of issues the trade representative deals with, and the vast array of Merrill Lynch holdings, such a scenario seems potentially quite problematic.

But here’s the quirk for Kirk: He was a lobbyist in Austin, Texas. Not in Washington, D.C.

And that allows Kirk to easily avoid the requirements of President Obama’s'anti-lobbyist ethics rules, which apply only to federal lobbyists.

Apparently all lobbyists aren’t created equal and Kirk is just another example of how Obama is bending his own rules to satisfy his agenda hoping no one will actually notice his doublespeak.


http://www.aim.org/don-irvine-blog/another-lobbyist-set-to-join-administration/

 

So we hear Obama saying “No lobbyists” will work in his Administration; signs “waivers” to allow them to do so, but states he will have a “Transparent” and “Honest” government?


The days of “Old Washington” are over…..???

The “Change We Can Believe In”???

 

Muslim Apologist/Saudi Lobbyist Set To Chair Obama’s National Intelligence Council

Muslim Apologist/Saudi Lobbyist Set To Chair Obama’s National Intelligence Council

Since it was revealed over the last few days that Chas Freeman is apparently slated to head the Obama administration’s National Intelligence Council, much evidence has been presented linking him to pro-Islamist, anti-Israel sentiments.

Now the Middle East Forum is reporting that Freeman received $1 million from the Saudis for public relations services, “Chas Freeman, reportedly nominated to head the National Intelligence Council preparing finished National Intelligence Estimates for President Obama, acknowledged in 2006 that the $1 million donation to his Middle East Policy Council that he received from “the generosity of King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia” was for public relations in the United States.”

Going back to Obama’s “community” work in Chicago it has been long apparent that he is no supporter of Israel, his close friendship with former PLO official Rashid Khalidi being symptomatic.

Given the already alarming information surfacing on Freeman, the prospect of him being associated with U.S. intelligence at any level should give pause for great concern among those in the West who are still intent upon meeting the challenge of the Islamic jihad in both its violent as well as stealth modes.

Freeman’s potential to skew intelligence at the Council in support of his Islamism is extremely troubling and nothing that we have read encapsulates that better than something he wrote in 2006.

“…We have paid heavily and often in treasure in the past for our unflinching support and unstinting subsidies of Israel’s approach to managing its relations with the Arabs.  Five years ago we began to pay with the blood of our citizens here at home.  We are now paying with the lives of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines on battlefields in several regions of the realm of Islam, with more said by our government’s neoconservative mentors to be in prospect…”

In the space of just these few words Freeman displays a breathtaking level of ignorance — blaming the 9/11 terror attacks on U.S. support for the only democracy in the Middle East, casting Israel as the villain in matters pertaining to “the realm of Islam,” [a term of great currency in radical Muslim circles] and blames our presence in Iraq also on our support of that tiny Jewish nation, especially due to the the work of the “neoconservatives,” an anti-Semitic code in common parlance among leftist Jew haters.

With Obama’s tilt towards the Palestinians already evident, the addition of Freeman into the mix will turn an already seriously flawed Mid-East policy into a disaster in short course.

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

Then add this:

 

Will Samantha Power have a role in giving aid to Hamas?

Ed Lasky
As I wrote about on American Thinker yesterday, the Obama administration will send 900 million dollars in aid money to Gaza, ostensibly to rebuild the area after the battle between Israel and Hamas two months ago .  The money will be funneled through UN agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This is disingenuous and deceptive. These entities will be merely conduits to send money to Hamas members and to the terror group itself. The United Nations Refugee and Works Agency has not only admitted to having Hamas members on its payrolls, its offices have been used as havens by terrorists.

Andy McCarthy at National Review (McCarthy knows a great deal about terrorism, he is a former Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and prosecuted Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others for the first World Trade Center bombing):

 

Even Obama’s pal Khalidi has acknowledged that UNRWA has on its payroll official “members of different political groups such as… Hamas and Islamic Jihad, without reference to their belonging to a specific group” (emphasis added).  UNRWA fails to screen its 23,000 employees (99 percent of whom are Palestinians) for terrorist ties.  As my friend Claudia Rosett recently wrote in Forbes, the agency’s Israel-bashing commissioner, Karen Koning Abuzayd, absurdly told Congress it was too difficult for UNRWA to run checks against terrorist watch lists because “Arab last names sound so familiar.”  UNRWA further permits its employees to affiliate openly with Hamas and other terrorist organizations.  In addition, the agency claims it cannot screen recipients of its largesse for terror ties because — besides Arab names being so very difficult for Arabs to distinguish — attempting such screening would endanger staff members.  Translation:  Of course we give the money to Hamas.

And that’s not the half of it.  UNRWA-sponsored schools inculcate the Palestinians’ virulent, anti-Semitic brand of radical Islam.

Furthermore, UNRWA ambulances are used by Hamas to transport weapons and explosives to terrorists.  Its other vehicles have been used to ferry terrorist operatives for attacks against Israeli troops.  Its schools have been used both for launching terror attacks and as “summer camps” that provide paramilitary training to tens of thousands of Palestinian children.  UNRWA camps are used by Hamas as bomb- and arms factories.

UNRWA takes in hundreds of millions (indeed, billions) in aid.  Some is directly funnelled to Hamas in cash or in kind.  But for the most part, UNRWA performs social welfare services quite consciously to free Hamas — the Palestinians’ chosen government — to divert its limited resources to wage a terrorist war (“the resistance”) against Israel.


Furthermore, the Obama administration is working on forging a unity government between Fatah and Hamas. If this were to occur, Hamas would have access to aid that had previously flowed to the Palestinian Authority (which for all intents and purposes is controlled by Fatah). Fatah has already been caught sending aid money from the West Bank to Hamas members in Gaza. But it will get worse should this unity government, being pressed by the Obama team, come to pass.

It will only be a matter of time that Hamas takes control of the unity government and throws out Fatah members (or throws them off roofs, as they have been doing in Gaza when they took control there). This op-ed by Mohammad Yaghi explores the probability of this event happening in today’s Jerusalem Post.

The aid announcement was officially made by the State Department-a welcoming gift to the Palestinians as Hillary prepares for her first trip there as Secretary of State. But who will monitor and control the funds?

This is where Samantha Power may very well come into play.

She is a fierce critic of Israel. She was indisputably Barack Obama’s closest foreign policy adviser during the campaign. They go back years. She was placed on the National Security Council as senior director for multilateral affairs. This role encompasses working with groups such as the United Nations and non-governmental organizations

These are the groups that will be used to channel aid to the Gazans (i.e., Hamas).

Will Power have a role in monitoring and dispensing the 900 million dollars? As I have written about before, the State Department is being progressively stripped of its power to make foreign policy.

This may turn out to be another example of how the formulation and practice of foreign policy is being taken from the State Department and centralized in the National Security Council. I wrote about this dynamic here . After my article was published, Dick Morris seemed to concur (see Hillary’s Incredible, Shrinking Role ).

 

 http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/will_samantha_power_have_a_rol.html

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 147 other followers