A Usurper In Office? “Native” Born NOT Natural Born: Secrecy and Lies **Update #1! Massive Internet Scrub In Progress!*** Includes Update #2

***Updates #1 and #2 are at end of this blog!***

Usurp:

v. u·surped, u·surp·ing, u·surps
v.tr.
1. To seize and hold (the power or rights of another, for example) by force or without legal authority. See Synonyms at appropriate.
2. To take over or occupy without right: usurp a neighbor’s land.
3. To take the place of (another) without legal authority; supplant.
v.intr.
To seize another’s place, authority, or possession wrongfully.

u·surper n.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/usurper

 

Are the investigations AND the court cases heating up?  Obama has spent millions of dollars and a near brigade of lawyers to keep his true birth certificate, all school records of Occidental College, Columbia University, Harvard Law School or anything relating to his citizenship buried with motions and legal mubo-jumbo.

Hell, America knew about George W. Bush; who his parents are, his ins and outs with the National Guard and even knew he wasn’t the “best student” with mainly “C” grades in college.

WHAT is Obama hiding?  AND WHY?

If you still have doubts:  READ THIS!

From:  http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

**All credit for this goes to Beckwith in its entirety***

 

 Fight The Smears Disappears
 
Barack Obama is now hiding his short form Certification of Live Birth.  It appears that Obama has taken down his “Fight the Smears” website.
As the public groundswell surrounding Obama’s birth certificate grows, Obama has removed his phony Certification of Live Birth from the Internet.  The one at the link in the “share the fact” box is also gone.  What’s really strange is the archived copies in the WayBackMachine, the Internet Archive, are also gone.  Removing those copies required additional steps to remove and should be beyond Obama’s reach — but I guess not.
But guess what?  Obama’s published lies are in my cache.  I learned a long time ago that anything Obama sensitive has to be cached, because Obama’s Obots will take it down.
What I never noticed before, is the damning statement in the window in the left column, under the legend, “Share the Facts Copy the text below and paste it into your email.”  It is also in the banner at the top of the page.
The statement reads (cursor down), “The fact is Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.”
A “native born citizen” is not the same as a “natural born citizen.” A “native born citizen” is any person born in the mainland US.  Anchor babies are “native born citizens.”
A “natural born citizen” must be born in the mainland US and must have TWO US citizen parents.  Obama knows he had only one US parent.  The man knows he is occupying the Oval Office in violation of the requirements of the US Constitution and applicable Supreme Court caselaw.
 

***Note links are in BROWN on my blog, not the usual BLUE***

 

Then ADD THIS:

 

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/why-do-both-obamas-state-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Eligibility Dispute Is Serious

 

A judge hearing one of the cases challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president has taken the unusual step of describing the dispute as a serious constitutional issue and further has begun adding letters of comment from the public to the court record.

Word of the action by U.S. Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider in Camden, N.J., comes from attorney Mario Apuzzo, who is handling the Kerchner vs. Obama case, which Apuzzo filed in January on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr.

Named as defendants are Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The case focuses on the alleged failure in Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, “provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate ‘elected’ by the Electoral College Electors.”

The Constitution provides, the lawsuit said, “If the president-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified.”

“There existed significant public doubt and grievances from plaintiffs and other concerned Americans regarding Obama’s eligibility to be president and defendants had the sworn duty to protect and preserve the Constitution and specifically under the 20th Amendment, Section 3, a Constitutional obligation to confirm whether Obama, once the electors elected him, was qualified,” the case explained.

“Congress is the elected representative of the American people and the people speak and act through them,” the lawsuit said.

The defendants “violated” the 20th Amendment by failing to assure that Obama meets the eligibility requirements,” the lawsuit said.

Update from Mario Apuzzo: Activity in Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Lawsuit 

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit was filed today and is posted on the PACER system as Document 27.  A copy of defendants’ motion and supporting brief are available in the right frame of this blog.

 

We all know that we have seen months of stalling from the defendants. We fully expected this dismissal motion which Obama has previously used when he was a mere candidate.

 

The difference now is that Obama is the putative President and not simply a candidate with a 1st Amendment right to run for political office.

 

As the putative President, Obama must show that he is qualified under Article II of our Constitution. We also know that Congress failed to exercise its Constitutional duty to properly vet Obama prior to confirming him as President at the Joint Session.

 

The motion return date is July 20, 2009. We, of course, will file opposition to their dismissal motion prior to that date.

I will comment more later after I have had a chance to fully study the motion and supporting brief in greater detail.

 

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg NJ 08831
Email: apuzzo [AT] erols.com
TEL: 732-521-1900 ~ FAX: 732-521-3906
BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com

 

P.S. Also, please feel free to join the discussions and comments in this forum about the subject of the Natural Born Citizenship clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution by here:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html

 

For all the information you want to or need to know about Obama go here:

http://www.theobamafile.com

 

My end note:

Okay America!  There you have it.  A horde of information at your disposal to peruse or ignore.

The choice is yours.

****UPDATE  #1 !!**** 

 

 

 

Massive Internet Scrub In Progress

Yesterday’s item, “Fight the Smears Disappears,” documented the changes that have recently been made to Obama’s high-profile Internet site, “Fight the Smears,” and also to the Internet Archive, also known as the “WayBackMachine.com” —
Obama has removed his bogus Certification of Live Birth from the Internet — at the same time, the Internet Archive just happened to “lose” its archived copy.
In the last 24 hours, further evidence of an, organized, massive scrubbing of the Internet has been discovered.
However, the first evidence of this extraordinary campaign was posted on this site on June 18th.  Sometime between June 8, 2009, and June 18, 2009, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) changed their requirements for identification.  During this period, they changed their policy.  Hawaii will now accept Certifications of Live Birth (COLB) as proof of identification and residency, and will no longer require the certified “Certificates of Birth” — although Hawaii will still take the traditional birth certificates.
 

 

 

 

 

On June 7th, this website reported that the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu posted on its website a letter on White House stationery dated Jan. 24 in which Obama wrote, “As a beneficiary of the excellence of Kapi’olani Medical Center — the place of my birth — I am pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters” — even though Obama himself has previously claimed to have been born at Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu, a claim backed up by his sister Maya.
Until June 7th, even United Press International (UPI) and Snopes.com contained documentation that Obama was born at the Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu.  Here is a screen capture from Snopes.com that says, “Barack Hussein Obama was born at the Queen’s Medical Center.”   Today, Snopes.com claims that “Barack Hussein Obama, was born on 4 August 1961 at the Kapiolani Medical Center.”
Snopes claims they made the change because Wikipedia also made the change.
Here is the UPI screen capture that claims Obama was born at Queens — but now the UPI claims Kapiolani.
Remember, Obama, himself, told UPI that he was born at Queens.
So, because someone at the White House sent a letter to Kapiolani, all the websites that have been covering for Obama are now scrambling to scrub content that they have claimed as accurate for the last couple of years.

 

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

 

 

UPDATE #2:   July 11, 2009

 **ALL information below is credited solely to Beckwith at http://www.theobamafile/ObamaLatest.htm

 

 

“The Continent Of His Birth

As the massive Internet scrubbing operation continues, new stuff just keeps popping up.

ModernGhana.com reports:

 that Obama is expected to announce a major foreign policy for Africa during his historic two-day visit to Ghana, beginning Friday, July 10, 2009.
Although Mr Obama has made foreign policy pronouncements for some parts of the world since assuming office in January, this year, he is yet to make one for Africa, and his visit to the country, which the White House describes as “one of our most trusted partners in sub-Saharan Africa”, is expected to be used as a platform to unveil his foreign policy for Africa.
“It is expected that President Obama will make a major foreign policy statement on Africa,” Ghana’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Alhaji Mohammed Mumuni, told the Daily Graphic.
For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth.

 

 

 

Did you catch that last part?
“…the continent of his birth.”  
 
 

 

 

Let’s see?  Does this make it three, or is it four, claims, from responsible sources, that Barack Obama was born in Africa.

This video

contains two Interviews with Sarah Obama (Barack’s Kenyan Paternal Grandmother) claiming Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
The first interview was done from her home in Kenya after the third and final presidential debate. In this clip Bishop McRae questions Sarah Obama about her grandsons supposed birth in Kenya. Ms. Obama replies that he was indeed born in Kenya and that she was present at the birth. Ms. Obama’s grandson who is translating Bishop McRae’s questions vehmently disagrees with Sarah. Ms. Obama insists throughout the interview he was born in Kenya despite her grandson’s protest. The second interview was done for a profile piece on Barack Obama. Sarah Obama’s statements contradict the vital records produced by the Obama campaign to prove his eligibility for the presidency.
And then there’s the recording

 

of the Kenyan Ambassador admitting Obama was born in Kenya on the Mike In The Morning show on WRIF radio, in Detroit.
The radio jocks called the Kenyan Embassy, and spoke to the Kenyan ambassador to the United States, Peter Ogego. Odongo, in this recording, admits that it is a well known fact that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, and plans are underway to build a memorial at the site of his birth.
The entire phone call can be heard here:
 

 

Stay tuned.

 

 
 

About these ads

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/a-usurper-in-office-native-born-not-natural-born-secrecy-and-lies/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Re: “A “natural born citizen” must be born in the mainland US and must have TWO US citizen parents.”

    Baloney! A Natural Born Citizen is a synonym of a native born citizen, meaning someone who was born in the USA. If the writers of the Constitution had meant that a Natural Born Citizen had to have two US parents, they would have said it.

    In fact, “Natural Born” was commonly used in the US colonies before the Revolution as a synonym for someone who was born in the colony. There was even a commonly used legal term, a “Natural Born Subject,” which again was someone who was born in the colony or in Britain.

    Response by Romanticpoet:

    Article II Section 1 Of the CONSTITUTION Re: President

    No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec1

    I also suggest you go here:

    http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm

    Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen and at the time of his birth (1961) Kenyans were BRITISH citizens.

    In order for Obama’s mother to convey American citizenship to Obama she would have to be “five years past the age of 14″. Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born. Therefore, she was too young to convey citizenship to Obama.

    IF Obama was born in the U.S., he would classify as a “native citizen” which Obama ADMITS to . ANCHOR babies (A Child born to immigrants in U.S) are “native citizens” and WOULD NOT QUALIFY TO BE THE U.S. PRESIDENT.

    Neither parent qualifies as a person to “convey” U.S. citizenship to Obama.

    Your argument has no merit.

  2. Obama was born in Hawaii. Natural Born Citizen means that if he is born in the USA, he is considered a US citizen. That is because at the time of the Constitution anyone who was born in the USA was considered a Natural Born Subject.

    If you can prove that he was not born in the USA, that would be different, of course.

    But since the evidence is there that he was born in the USA, and no evidence that he was born anywhere else, he is a Natural Born Citizen. The age of the mother is irrelevant. His father was a foreigner, but the children of foreigners (except for the children of diplomats)are natural born if they were born in the USA, because that is what Natural Born means.

    The son or daughter of two Mexicans, even if the mother were 13 years old, would still be eligible, so long as the candidate was born in the USA, was 35 years old and had lived in the USA for 14 years.

    And that is why such prominent conservative Senators who are also lawyers as Orren Hatch and Lindsay Graham say that a Natural Born Citizen is simply one who was born in the USA:

    Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said:

    “Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)

    Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:

    “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)

    And:

    Gov. Bobby Jindal, who delivered the Republican response to Obama’s speech, said: “Regardless of party, all Americans are moved by the President’s personal story – the son of an American mother and a Kenyan father, who grew up to become leader of the free world.”

    Jindal, of course, would be even less of a citizen under Vattel’s concept because neither of his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. His mother was about three months pregnant when they came to the USA.

    Consider the logic of the alleged requirement that two parents be citizens at the time of birth. Under this theory, if one of my parents gets naturalized one day after I was born, I’m not eligible. If both are naturalized a minute before I am born, I am eligible.

    This may be useful as an arbitrary breakdown of who should and should not be president, but what is the REAL sense behind it? Does the fact that someone was naturalized before really make a difference to someone’s loyalty? What evidence is there that the framers though this, instead of the more commonly used rule of birth in the country, which was used by the Common Law? And that is the traditional meaning of “natural born,” which stems from Natural Born Subject.

    And finally, does the allegiance of the parent really affect the loyalty of a child at all? If my father was a Baptist, does this mean that I have to stay a Baptist all my life? No, of course not. And, the same about my father being a Kenyan. If my father were a Kenyan, in later years I might have an allegiance to Kenya, or I might not—just like my allegiance to the Baptist religion. There is no evidence that the framers of the Constitution thought any differently.

    So, would the Supreme Court rule that Obama was not a natural born citizen? I doubt that there is even four votes for taking up the case. At least two justices had fathers who were born in Italy (Alito and Scalia), and they are the ones who would be asking “If my father was naturalized after my birth instead of before my birth, would I be any less loyal?”

    Response by Romantipoet:

    It is up to Obama to PROVE he was born in the U.S.A.

    ALL photoshopped/fake COLB’s posted on the web are PROVEN FAKES.

    WHY has Obama spent MILLIONS of dollars to keep his Birth Certificate under lock and key?

    AND why IS THIS HAPPENING?

    Massive Internet Scrub In Progress

    Yesterday’s item, “Fight the Smears Disappears,” documented the changes that have recently been made to Obama’s high-profile Internet site, “Fight the Smears,” and also to the Internet Archive, also known as the “WayBackMachine.com” — Obama has removed his bogus Certification of Live Birth from the Internet — at the same time, the Internet Archive just happened to “lose” its archived copy.

    What’s really ironic is that FactCheck.org is so invested in their defense of Obama’s bogus bona fides, that they just can’t dig themselves out of the hole they dug themselves into. FactCheck now stands alone as a defender of the indefensible.

    In the last 24 hours, further evidence of an, organized, massive scrubbing of the Internet has been discovered.

    Evidence of this extraordinary campaign was posted on this site on June 18th. Sometime between June 8, 2009, and June 18, 2009, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) changed the requirements for identification that they maintained for over 100 years. All of a sudden, Hawaii will now accept Certifications of Live Birth (COLB) as proof of identification and residency, and will no longer require the certified “Certificates of Birth” — although Hawaii says that they will still take the traditional birth certificates.

    On June 7th, this website reported that the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu posted on its website
    a letter on White House stationery dated January 24th (since scrubbed), in which Obama wrote, “As a beneficiary of the excellence of Kapi’olani Medical Center — the place of my birth — I am pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters” — even though Obama himself has previously claimed to have been born at Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu, a claim backed up by his sister Maya.

    Until June 7th, even United Press International (UPI) and Snopes.com contained statements that Obama was born at the Queen’s Medical Center in Honolulu. Here is a screen capture from Snopes.com that says, “Barack Hussein Obama was born at the Queen’s Medical Center.” Today, Snopes.com claims that “Barack Hussein Obama, was born on 4 August 1961 at the Kapiolani Medical Center.” Snopes claims they made the change because Wikipedia made the change.

    Here is the UPI screen capture that claims Obama was born at Queens — but now the UPI claims Kapiolani. Remember, Obama, himself, told UPI that he was born at Queens.

    So, because someone at the White House sent a letter to Kapiolani, all the websites that have been covering for Obama are now scrambling to scrub content that they have claimed as accurate for the last couple of years.

    Over one year ago, I wrote the following for the “Biography” page:

    On the Internet, there is an organized, systematic cleansing of Obama-related content.

    Every couple of days I get an email telling me this link, or that link, connects to a “Page not found — 404 error.” The extensive body of Obama web-knowledge, that has evolved over the last 20 years, is shrinking. Stuff that’s considered an Obama smear or unflattering is sent to the Obama ’08 cyber shredding machine. And the campaign is getting help from some really big web service providers.A good example is Kristof’s famous New York Times article, in which Kristof quotes Obama saying that the Muslim call to prayer is “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth” and in which Obama recited the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, “with a first-class [Arabic] accent” — that’s gone — from The New York Times — but it’s here though.

    And, the Trinity UCC website has completely changed. Now, it’s all sweetness and light. Gone are all those great Rev. Wright “God damn America” videos and anti-Israeli Trumpet magazine excerpts.

    There’s less on the web every day. In time, the entire Obama body of knowledge will consist of Obama’s 3 bogus novels — “Dreams From My Father” — “The Audacity of Hope” — and the latest — “Change We Can Believe In” — all written by Barack Hussein Obama or his “ghost-writers.”

    Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released (lawyers’ fees = $2,000,000 ~ birth certificate = $15)

    Certification of Live Birth — Released — Counterfeit
    Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released (if one exists)
    Obama/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)

    Kindergarten records — Records lost (this is a big one — see here — read two frames)
    Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
    Soetoro adoption records — Not released

    Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released (by independent investigators)
    Punahou School records — Not released
    Soetoro/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)

    Selective Service Registration — Released — Counterfeit
    Occidental College records — Not released
    Passport — Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser.
    Columbia College records — Not released
    Columbia thesis — “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament” — Not released
    Harvard College records — Not released
    Harvard Law Review articles — None

    Illinois Bar Records — Not released.
    Baptism certificate — None
    Medical records — Not released
    Illinois State Senate records — None
    Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost
    Law practice client list — Not released
    University of Chicago scholarly articles — None

    You can find links to facts and evidence HERE:

    http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

  3. Re: “ALL photoshopped/fake COLB’s posted on the web are PROVEN FAKES.”

    Answer: Two guys, neither of whom will give his real name, have claimed that the image on the web was false. The third expert, a real expert, merely said that an image on the Web cannot be proven to be authentic either way.

    However, it does not matter. The image is only a representation of the real physical document, which was shown to FactCheck and Polifact, and which was authenticated by the two officials in Hawaii who looked into the file and said that there was an original birth certificate in the file. At the time Hawaii did not allow foreign birth certificates to be entered into its files, so the original must be a Hawaiian birth certificate.

    Oh, and by the way, if the image had been forged, then the Republicans would have been all over the situation during the campaign and some law-enforcement types too.

    Re: “WHY has Obama spent MILLIONS of dollars to keep his Birth Certificate under lock and key?”

    Answer. He hasn’t. All the lawsuits against him were either to stop the election or to stop the certification of the election.

    Response by Romanticpoet:
    You just keep being a lemming and follow the “One”.
    One day you will wake up.

  4. Re: “Here is a screen capture from Snopes.com that says, “Barack Hussein Obama was born at the Queen’s Medical Center.” Today, Snopes.com claims that “Barack Hussein Obama, was born on 4 August 1961 at the Kapiolani Medical Center.”

    This is what is known as “fixing your mistake.” Apparently all the Queens stories originated with UPI which also changed its site because it got the facts wrong.

    Response by Romanticpoet:

    Yep, just keep bending the truth to fit your needs.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 376 other followers

%d bloggers like this: