The NEW America In 2010…Never Underestimate Patriots Protecting America!

 

First this with a hat tip to Trevor Loudon at New Zeal: http://www.newzeal.blogspot.com

 

 

Then add this from the American Teaparty:

 

 

March on Washington

Details: http://912dc.org

 

To OUR CONGRESS:

The IN or OUT in 2010 PLEDGE

http://interactive.foxnews.com/projects/inorout/

 

Show us by ACTIONS; not just WORDS or the shill of the day! OR YOU ARE OUT IN 2010!

 

The Lobbyists-First Healthcare Reform Bill. The “Screw” America Obamacare Plan.

 

 

 Didn’t Obama state during his campaign that there would be NO LOBBYISTS in the White House?  That lobbyists would NOT influence his agenda?

 

Is Obama just deceitful?  Or just bald face LYING?

 

The Lobbyists-First Healthcare Reform Bill

August 31, 2009

by Kyle-Anne Shiver

 

In the vernacular preferred by most men I know, Obamacare could be called the “Screw-You” plan.  Just about every special interest in this Country will make out like bandits, while you and I will be…well yes, I hate to say it, but here goes:  we taxpayers will be royally screwed.
 
 
 
 

 

We pay; they play. 

 

The special interests that elected this president are conducting multi-million dollar ad campaigns to seal the deal on Obamacare.  Every one of them has had a very cushy seat at the power table where the bill was written, not on C-SPAN as candidate Obama promised, but behind closed doors.

 

Good ole boys, whether from Chicago or New Orleans, play ball by the same slimy rules. 

 

Big Pharma, according to Forbes, is expected to spend as much as $150 million on ads supporting Obamacare.  The 1997 FDA rule change that opened the door to direct TV ads aimed at patients, rather than their doctors, heralded a golden age of unprecedented profits.  But many of those so-called miracle drugs developed in the 90s are about to go off patent and this will shrink Pharma’s profits.  The president has promised the drug companies that if they give $80 billion discounts up front, then there will be no haggling with the government over pricing in the future.  Good deal for Big Pharma; bad deal for taxpayers.

 

Can we use the word, “fascist,” yet?

 

If you wonder why the union bosses are sending thugs to harass, intimidate and assault Obamacare dissenters at townhall meetings, there are billions of reasons hidden in the legislation.  Union bosses spent so much money – about $65 million — getting Democrats elected last year that they are now on the financial ropes.  Obama’s campaign got $28 million from the SEIU alone.  Unions now have only about 30 cents for every dollar of projected costs for member pension plans.  Buried in Section 164 of Obamacare is the anticipated $10 billion taxpayer bailout that helps these union bosses make up for their profligate political spending.  And that’s only the first-on-the-table figure.  It’s sure to get bigger and bigger as time passes. 

 

In the real world, we call that political payback.  And, honey, it’s anything but transparent. 

 

Health insurance companies, who have mysteriously been one of the Democrats’ favorite targets in the reform sales blitz, are also on board with the plan.  The reason for this may seem shortsighted on their part, since every sentient observer well understands that the so-called public option is sure to eventually put them out of business, but in the short term, they stand to be guaranteed millions of young, healthy, government-mandated customers to help offset the expense of also-mandated coverage for all comers, regardless of pre-existing conditions. And it should not be forgotten that HMO executives gave more than $1.2 million to the Obama campaign.  Perhaps the boomer insurance execs are counting on the inevitable bankruptcy-tsunami coming after they’ve gone to their own golden parachutes in the sky. 

 

Smelling fishier and fishier, honey.

 

Trial lawyers are in greedy-rapture mode, dreaming up schemes to convince even more patients to file malpractice suits, since there’s not even a shred of tort reform in ObamaCare.  The multi-million dollar abortion industry is all aflutter, as FactCheck.org has confirmed, abortions would be covered by the federal plan and also by federally subsidized private plans.  Pro-illegal immigrant groups are purely salivating over Obamacare, since there isn’t a solitary provision in this bill that would require anyone signing up for benefits to prove he is indeed a U.S. citizen.  And George Soros, a multi-billion-dollar special interest unto himself, will get the eugenics-lite approach he favors to end-of-life decision making.

 

So, what we have here, dear readers, is a gargantuan failure to communicate.  The trio of Statist Tyrants in charge — Obama, Pelosi and Reid — have decided that saying the opposite of what they mean, all the while accusing others of lying, is indeed the way to have an “open debate” about healthcare reform. 

 

As these Democrats put on their plastic smiley faces in public, they are screaming the figurative, “Screw You,” behind closed doors.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/the_lobbyistsfirst_healthcare.html

 

From Human Events:

For the next three weeks, until Congress returns on September 4, congressional Democrats — at least those, unlike Indiana’s Baron Hill, who is apparently too scared of his constituents to even schedule a town hall meeting — will be hearing continuously from constituents who are concerned and angry at the Dems’ approach to health care “reform.”

But they have a lot on their side.  Especially Obama’s three stooges:  the SEIU, AARP and PhRMA.

Pelosi’s strategy memo also said, “The Leadership is working in close coordination with the White House and outside groups (including but not limited to HCAN, Families USA, AFSCME, SEIU, AARP, etc.) to ensure complementary efforts during August.”  Complimentary means opposing the protests of concerned Americans.

The three stooges are all members of a coalition of union, lobbying and business groups called “Heathy Economy Now” which is spending an enormous amount of money on television ads aimed at the Blue Dog Democrats, seeking to push them into supporting Obamacare.

The Service Employees’ International Union made its presence felt in the 2008 election, spending a reported $150 million to elect Obama and Congressional Democrats.  And they’re showing up at the town hall meetings in considerable numbers.  We’ve all seen the video of people wearing SEIU t-shirts pushing and shoving — physically assaulting — protesters outside one town hall meeting.  They want the so-called “public option” which will establish government-run healthcare, and they will brook no dissent.

AARP supposedly represents the retired and elderly.  But Obamacare proposes to cut about $500 million out of Medicare over the next decade, and will result in both healthcare rationing and “rationalization.” The rationalization — based on cost effectiveness determined by life expectancy — will limit what the elderly can obtain from their doctors.  If the Washington bureaucracy decides that you’re too old for a hip replacement, you’ll either have to pay for it yourself, or be unable to get it.

Perhaps the most shameful is PhRMA: the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaPhRMA is the business lobby comprised of drug manufacturers

Its support was purchased in negotiations with the White House.  PhRMA’s chief is former Louisiana Democratic congressman Billy Tauzin.

As the Wall Street Journal reported on August 7, “Chief pharma lobbyist Billy Tauzin’s clients were probably wondering about the return on their investment. Then, lo, Mr. Tauzin disclosed this week in a page-one story in the New York Times that, yes, the concessions were capped at $80 billion, no further. ‘We were assured: ‘We need somebody to come in first. If you come in first, you will have a rock-solid deal,’” Mr. Tauzin said. ‘Adding other stuff changes the deal.’ The White House confirmed Mr. Tauzin’s account.”

Tauzin had said, according to the Times report, that the deal was confirmed with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, deputy chief of staff Jim Messina and health care reform “czarina” Nancy-Ann DeParle.

PhRMA

PhRMA


PhRMA is planning to spend $150 million on television ads supporting Obamacare beginning this month.  You can’t expect to see the hard sell from PhRMA: with all that money to spend, they’ll likely hire the best actors and actresses to star in their commercials.  The old will be likely be assured by Wilford Brimley that they won’t feel the pain of Medicare cuts.  Younger voters will probably be told about the benefits of Obamacare by experts such as Denise Richards, famous consumer of optional enhancement surgery.

PhRMA Connections

PhRMA Connections

 

Obama and his congressional cohort are in a state of near-panic because Americans are speaking out in huge numbers against their effort to nationalize health care.  Voters rightly doubt that Obamacare will do anything to improve the way they receive health care or limit its cost.

It won’t do either, and the more Americans speak out to stop it, the more likely we’ll be able to have the best healthcare system in the world: that’s the one we have now, not the one Obama’s three stooges want to shove us into.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/Obamas%20Three%20Stooges.html

 

AMERICA!

STAND UP!  SPEAK WITH BOLDNESS!

MARCH ON WASHINGTON TO TELL OUR CONGRESS AND OBAMA WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH!

DETAILS:     http://912dc.org

Obama Throws Eastern Europe Under the Bus. Is This George Soros’ Idea?

 

FIRST THIS: From American Thinker…..

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/08/obama_throws_eastern_europe_un.html

Obama throws Eastern Europe under the bus

August 30, 2009

By Jeanette Colville

The U.S. has abandoned plans to install a missile defense system in Europe, according to a report. If true, this is a major strategic error that will have serious consequences for our allies in Europe and for us.
 
 
Quoting a U.S. source, the Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza says the Obama administration has decided against building a missile shield to protect Poland and the Czech Republic.
 
 
The reason? Russian opposition.
 
 
Now, if we want to build a defense system for friends in Europe, we’ll have to place it in the Balkans, Israel or somewhere else. That is, if Russia approves.
 
 
This is a stark reversal of past policy and reneges on promises made by the current administration. Worse, it shows weakness. We got into a staredown with the Russian bear and we blinked.
 
 
This is the treaty that Condi Rice and President Bush worked out. This is what our wonderful allies Poland, Hungary, Romania, Croatia, Czech, Slovenia all wanted so desperately… NOW they again fear that they are looking down the guns and tanks of Russia storming back and crushing them… it is so tragic.
 
 
The spirit of economic and social and political recovery in those countries was so powerful when I was there winter before last…  now this… America has turned its back on them (via Obama). 

 

 
 

**Note here**  The ONE salvation in all of this is:  Russia HATES George Soros.
 
 
 

 

 

He (Soros) had already been widely proclaiming that it was his own machinations that brought down the Soviet Empire.  When asked about his sphere of influence in the Soviets’ demise for a New Republic interview in 1994, Mr. Soros humbly replied that the author ought to report that “the former Soviet Empire is now called the Soros Empire.”

 

 

When our House Banking Committee investigated the Russia-gate scandal in 1999, trying to determine just how $100 billion had been diverted out of Russia, forcing the collapse of its currency and the default of its enormous loans from the International Monetary Fund, Soros was even called to testify.  He denied involvement of course, but finally admitted that he had used insider access in a deal that was barred to foreign investors to acquire a huge chunk of Sidanko Oil. 

 

 

The Russia scandal was labeled by Rep. Jim Leach, then head of the House Banking Committee to be “one of the greatest social robberies in human history.” (Shadow Party; David Horowitz and Richard Poe; p. 96)

 

 

Of course, Russia-gate was quickly hushed up and pushed aside in the public’s lurid, and quite insatiable, interest in Monica-gate. 

 

 

Then, George Soros did some more shady economic fooling around in France.  And he actually got caught and charged with illegal insider trading in his attempt to takeover the Societe Generale bank.  He was convicted and the conviction was upheld in 2 separate appeals, the last in June of 2006.  They let him off, however, with a piddling $2.9 million fine.

 

 

Mere chicken feed to a multi-billionaire.

 

 

Of course, since George Soros is a naturalized American citizen, it is difficult to imagine just why he would intentionally want to bring about our own economic collapse. 

 

 

But from all appearances, that might be exactly what he has on his mind. 

 

 

By 2003, Soros was already predicting the downfall of the dollar.  In a CNBC interview, amid a slump in the dollar’s value against the Euro, Soros added fuel to that fire by stating that he was already selling dollars.  His statement, in turn, caused a further decline in the international worth of the dollar.

 

 

When George Soros speaks, hedge fund managers and world financiers listen.

 

 

Unfortunately, he wasn’t able to bring about the “October Surprise“  U.S. economic downturn in time for the 2004 election.  Our economy proved too resilient for him then.

 

 

But he hasn’t stopped predicting that yearned-for recession that would spoil things for his political foes, the Republicans.

 

 

Read the rest of this article HERE

 

 

Mark `Moloch’ Brown: The Empire’s Coup Man in Georgia (ADD SOROS HERE)

Aug. 12, 2008 (EIRNS)—There is good reason for the British Empire’s silence about the attack by Mikhail Saakashvili’s Georgia on South Ossetia on Aug. 7, an attack that brought the world to the brink of World War III. Saakashvili was put in power by the duo of British agents—billionaire speculator and Nazi collaborator, George Soros, and Lord Mark Malloch Brown, now the United Kingdom’s Minister for Africa, Asia and the United Nations for the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). And, by tracking the records of the UN Development Program (UNDP) which Malloch Brown administered, and Soros’s Open Society Institute and its offshoots, the proverbial check stubs will be found.

Lord Malloch Brown has been in the business of overthrowing governments since 1986, when he left the London Economist for the international section of an agressive political consulting firm in the U.S. called Sawyer Miller, and from there advised the Presidential campaign of Corazon Aquino in the Philippines. He stuck with Aquino through the overthrow of President Ferdinand Marcos in 1986, a role about which he boasts. In 1990, he represented the Presidential campaign of Peruvian fascist novelist Mario Varga Llosa, a drug legalization advocate, who lost the election after proposing a vicious austerity program to cut the living standards of Peru’s lower classes. Sawyer Miller also helped promote the Dalai Lama against China.

From Sawyer Miller, Malloch Brown spent the next 18 years at the World Bank and the United Nations, forming a deep, but secretive relationship with Soros.

He is also secretive about his finances—he lists only his government salary of about $160,000 on financial disclosure forms. Prior to taking the Ministry job, he served as the Vice Chairman of George Soros’s hedge fund, the Quantum Fund in 2007. For a bit of comparison, note that Soros earned billions of dollars heading the Quantum Fund in recent years!

The subsidized home deal is identical to the arrangement which Malloch Brown had for about five years when he headed the UN Development Program, and then became Deputy Secretary General of the UN, and lived in New York. There he was a tenant at the five acre estate owned by George Soros in Katonah, New York, which the UN paid for, at $120,000 a year, to Soros. It was about 20% below the market price, but when asked about this house by a reporter, Malloch Brown stormed out of the interview, exclaiming, “I am doing God’s work!”

Malloch Brown and Soros have been co-conspirators in a global plot against the nation state since at least 1993, when Malloch Brown joined a group organized by Soros that travelled to Serbia and Bosnia, to advise him on how to best spend a $50 million grant to “rebuild” Bosnia, after the British orchestrated war had destroyed it. In the 1990s, Soros had also funded the street thug apparatus OTPOR, that boasts of toppling Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic in 2000. Soros’s network later used the experienced Serbian mob-controllers to create the “democracy shocktroops” for the “Rose Revolution” in Georgia that put Saakashvili into power.

Read the rest of this article HERE

 

My question is this:

IF George Soros believes in an “Open Society” and is thoroughly behind the United Nations goal of World Power; WHY would Obama concede the missile defense shield of Eastern Europe (deterrant to Russia) when George Soros is PRO Central and Eastern Europe democratization/oligarchy?

Overview: Central and Eastern Europe

More than a decade after the Berlin Wall fell, democracy and the rule of law have become firmly entrenched throughout the region—developments that have helped spur economic transformations reaching deep within each country. Since the late 1990s, all eight countries in the OSI website’s Central and Eastern Europe region have focused primarily on one overarching milestone: their accession into the European Union (EU) in May 2004. The lure of EU membership, with its highly anticipated economic and social benefits, has driven political decision making in each country—with profound and positive consequences for open society. Among other things, the accession process has contributed to the advancement of human rights, liberalized economic policies, increased government accountability, and helped to invigorate civil society.

As Central and Eastern European countries have worked to bring their political, economic, and social policies and practices in line with EU standards, OSI and its affiliated Soros foundations have promoted these reforms by offering policy advice, training civil servants, and funding the participation of civic groups in national and local public affairs. In several countries, for example, local Soros foundations supported voter turnout campaigns underlining the importance of elections to continuing reform and democratization.

Joining the European Union is not a panacea for open society deficits. Substantial attention must continue to be paid in accession countries as well as member states to fundamental issues like minority rights, corruption, and the free movement of people. Soros foundations are committed to making sure that EU criteria, adopted during the accession process, are actually put into practice once membership is achieved. OSI’s EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program seeks to ensure that that new and old member states live by the same criteria.

http://www.soros.org/initiatives/regions/central-eastern_europe/central-eastern_europe_overview

Stefan Batory Foundation (Poland)

Open Society Fund–Prague (Czech Republic)

Open Estonia Foundation

Open Society Foundation–Bratislava (Slovakia)

Soros Foundation–Hungary

Soros Foundation–Latvia

Open Society Fund–Lithuania

Open Society Institute to Give $100 Million

 to Aid Europeans in Need

Date:
June 18, 2009

The Open Society Institute will give $100 million to help communities in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union hardest hit by the global economic downturn.

“I believe it is the duty of those who have the means to step in to help,” said Open Society Institute chairman George Soros. “My foundation has a long commitment to the region. I wanted to do what I can, although I know it cannot alleviate the suffering.”

The funds are a one-time gift to be spent over the next two years in the Balkans, the Baltics, Central Asia, the Caucasus and Ukraine.

Many of the target countries are new members of the European Union that have had to slash budgets in the face of turbulent economic times. In addition, many donors have pulled out of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.

“We want to help those communities most at risk. My priority is helping young people. We need to help the next generation,” Soros said.

A committee made up of people from Eastern Europe will evaluate the severity of the crisis in each country. In cooperation with Soros foundations located in the 20 countries, the group will consider proposals for funding.

“No funding decisions have been made yet,” Soros said. “But projects could range from support to keep children in school to shelters to cultural institutions at risk of failing.”

The countries eligible to receive funds are Albania, Armenia, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Tajikistan and Ukraine.

http://www.soros.org/newsroom/news/europe_20090618

 

End note:

Soros is connected to the “dirty” corrupt politics of the UNITED NATIONS.

END United Nations’ attempt to remove our country’s sovereignty at the behest of George Soros.  GET RID OF THE UNITED NATIONS ON AMERICAN SOIL!

Soros has been manipulating the minds of Central and Eastern Europeans via $$$$.

What the master puppeteer (Soros) of Obama doesn’t realize is that this move will give Russia and Putin the GREEN LIGHT to invade any country in this bloc they consider weak.

I have said all along that Soros is behind anything Obama and the Far left Liberal Democratic Party does!  As they say “FOLLOW THE MONEY”…….

 

 

Obama Administration Announces Not Enforcing Union Reporting Laws

 

 

 

From Canada Free Press:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14252

 

 

Obama Administration Announces Not Enforcing Union Reporting Laws

Don’t expect Obama and Labor Secretary’s office, Hilda Solis, to help you uncover any illegalities perpetrated by your union bosses

by Warner Todd Huston

August 30, 2009

Are you a union member trying to find out information of the criminal actions and shady financial dealings of your union?

Well don’t expect Obama and his toady in the Labor Secretary’s office, Hilda Solis, to help you uncover any illegalities perpetrated by your union bosses.

Solis’ department has just announced that it is suspending the stringent reporting requirements that labor unions must by law satisfy to assure that their financial dealings are legal and above-board.

That’s right, unions have just been given a free pass for criminal actions by this president.

This is proof that political donations are the key to get away with crime. So, yes Virginia, crime does pay… at least in Obama’s Washington.

Here is the notice that recently appeared on the website of the U.S. Department of Labor:

NOTE:… Accordingly, OLMS will refrain from initiating enforcement actions against union officers and union employees based solely on the failure to file the report required by section 202 of the Labor-Management and Reporting Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 432, using the 2007 form, as long as individuals meet their statutorily-required filing obligation in some manner. OLMS will accept either the old Form LM-30 or the new one for purposes of this non-enforcement policy.

Solis’s office is claiming that the previous LM2 form was just too hard on those innocent, kindly union thugs and criminals, so she’s decided to just forget the whole thing. Capone’s Chicago couldn’t have had better friends in high places.

… Oh, and guess where Obama and most of his closest advisers are from? Could it be… mmmm… CHICAGO?

My end note:

Does this mean the hostile takeover attempt by Andy Stern of SEIU is just “water under the bridge”??

HOW DO YOU UNION MEMBERS FEEL NOW????

No OVERSIGHT, CRIMINAL ACTIONS or SHADY FINANCIAL DEALINGS of your UNION is now under the “control” of your Union boss…..and any “events” or “misappropriations” about pension funds, healthcare, etc. will have the Obama Administration turning a blind eye.  

 


No oversight is = Union corruption.

Union Boss Takeover of American Government Continues: AFL-CIO Official Named Head of NY Federal Reserve

 

Union Boss Takeover of American Government Continues: AFL-CIO Official Named Head of NY Federal Reserve

 

Tue, 08/25/2009 – 10:07 — Will Collins

Fresh on the heels of rumors that former union hatchet man Ron Bloom may become “czar” of US manufacturing policy, the AFL-CIO is crowing about the appointment of one of their own to run the most powerful regional Federal Reserve bank. Former electricians union boss Denis Hughes, top dog in a state where a forced unionism stanglehold has crushed the economy and employee freedom, has just been named chairman of New York’s powerful financial oversight board:

Denis Hughes, president of the New York State AFL-CIO, was named chairman of the powerful Federal Reserve Bank of New York today.

Hughes, a 40-year member of the Electrical Workers (IBEW), has led the New York State federation since 1999.

 

The New York bank is the operating arm of the Federal Reserve System in New York, northern New Jersey, Fairfield County in Connecticut, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. It is the largest of the 12 Federal Reserve district banks in terms of assets and volume of activity.

 

Given the Administration’s history of union-stooge appointments and administrative giveaways, we’re not exactly surprised by this latest development. But it is indeed disturbing to witness a slow-motion takeover of government and other powerful institutions by forced unionism proponents under the guise of “hope” and “change.”

http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-boss-takeover-american-government-conti-08252009

 

Union Car Czar Poised to Dictate America’s Manufacturing Policy 

Thu, 08/20/2009 – 10:54 — Will Collins

Regular Freedom@Work readers may remember Ron Bloom, a former Steelworker union operative charged with running the American auto industry from Washington. Now that car manufacturers are doing so “well,” Bloom is about to get a promotion:

The Obama Administration may elevate Ron Bloom, head of the government’s auto task force, to a job that would set U.S. manufacturing policy more broadly, people familiar with the matter said.

 

Bloom’s responsibilities at the new position? They’re extensive, to say the least:

As the chief policy maker on manufacturing, Bloom would be charged with reviewing U.S. competitiveness in the global economy. His job would likely encompass trade, taxes and other economic issues . . .

Just what American industry needs: another “czar whose relevant work experience involves running struggling companies into the ground and exploiting their workers. We’re sure industry leaders across the country are thrilled at the prospect of taking orders from a union czar. 

The result of this personnel move seems likely to be more forced unionism, less American competitiveness, more job losses, and ultimately more bankruptcies and taxpayer-funded bailouts of corruptly run union pension plans.

http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/union-car-czar-poised-dictate-manufacturing-p08212009

 

 


From Canada Free Press;

Union Labor Head as Czar of All U. S. Industries? – INCREDIBLE !

 

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14253

By Jerry McConnell  Sunday, August 30, 2009

Is there anyone out there who needs any more proof that the usurper that sits illegally in the President’s chair in the Oval Office of the White House is, bit by bit, piece by piece, and day by day, in the process of totally destroying the democratic republic that once was the United States?With 80 percent of the communications network of this country shut down, for all intents and purposes, regarding reports on anything that is not popular with that usurper, you might say that they are in his back pocket.  And for him, the usurper that is, if and when he reaches his goal of making America a pawn of the corrupt and dangerous United Nations he won’t have to declare the names of the totalitarian state run news and broadcast services as they will already be in place.

 

ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, MSNBC are all completely in the bag for the socialist/communist, liberal Democrats, as directed by their Commissar of Finance, George Soros. 

 

B. Hussein Obama will be the Grand Ruler of all World territories, but only in a figurehead role just as he is today here in the United States, where he is assigned to bring the country to its knees and place it in subservience to the United Nations.

The latest example of this rule of fear and suppression was announced on August 24, 2009 by the National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. that Ron Bloom, former United Steelworkers Union executive, who was appointed by Obama as his “car czar” some months ago, will soon be named to oversee ALL of America’s manufacturing.

Stacking the deck against American workers and consumers

How’s that for stacking the deck against American workers and consumers?  If you were nervous about corrupt and dangerous big union labor bosses running roughshod over the everyday workers and those of us who have to pay the freight for all manufactured materials in the past, you can quintuple your worries now that Obama has a bona fide, legitimate, illegitimate lackey to break knees and fingers of all non-complying workers in ALL places of manufacturing employment. Obama promised the suck-up unions that poured millions of dollars of workers dues into his campaign that he would repay them; and he did it brazenly and publicly.

This is just one more step to make complete the takeover of our country a fait accompli or in labor union thug language, ‘a dun deel’.

You might remember, that is if you are one of the country’s economy and financial stability aficionados, that it was the labor unions that caused the auto manufacturing industry to go to ruin with their strong-arm and brow-beating tactics.  Now Obama has determined that he would like those same people to do to ALL of our manufacturing capabilities what they did to autos.  And as “National Right To Work” says, with leadership like this it will only cripple our competitiveness in the world markets.

Naming the head of a large labor union as the Czar of all manufacturing businesses is like putting a person who cheats on his taxes in charge of all of our taxpayers’ dollars.  Oh… that’s right; Obama has already done that.  So I guess in his mind, this is no big deal.  Using that logic he will probably put a convicted rapist in charge of all women’s’ prisons.

Obama is getting to the point where he isn’t the least bit subtle anymore.  He was pretty good at hiding all of his communistic tendencies, but now, naming the people he chooses to rule over all phases of government and citizen control as CZARS, is about as inconspicuous as a freight train steaming through your bedroom at three o’clock in the morning.  However, that title which represented a barbaric stranglehold on the people if enslaved was finally eliminated when the people revolted against the tyranny of the czar in Russia in 1917.

Will the Russian Revolution be repeated right here in the United States to rid us of the tyrants who would enslave us?  The answer is imminent.

 

My End note:

As usual the Democrats in Congress are oblivious to the absolute OBVIOUS:  Obama intends to rid our country of the Legislative and Judicial branches as part of his oligarchy/totalitarian rule.

 

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer, Rep. Barbara Lee, Rep. Maxine Waters, Rep. Barney Frank, et.al  …….take NOTE…..Obama has your days as legislators numbered….and DON’T ASSUME your positions are in his agenda.

Why does Obama need them when he has his “Czars” answering only to him and doing his “bidding”……

The darkness and octopus arms of the Obama Administration are coming……..

WILL OUR CONGRESS WAKE UP and realize Obama’s true motives?

Rep. Michelle Bauchman almost has it right when she called this Administration a “Gangster Government”……

Hurricane Katrina Hero General Russell L. Honoré Mulling Run For Senate Seat in Louisiana.

 

From American Thinker:

August 29, 2009

A fresh face on the GOP bench?

Thomas Lifson

 

The palpable hunger for new leadership in the GOP makes most interesting the 2010 Senate run in Louisiana reportedly being mulled by Hurricane Katrina hero General Russell L. Honoré, for the seat currently held by David Vitter, seriously damaged by his name turning up in the client list of a prostitution ring in Washington DC, in 2007.
 
One primary opponent announced yesterday, US Rep. Charlie Melancon. Shortly afterward, this intriguing post appeared in Bayoubuzz.com:

 

The Louisiana Weekly and Bayoubuzz.com have learned that the hero of Hurricane recovery, General Russell Honore is seriously considering entering the Republican Primary for the U.S. Senate seat against incumbent David Vitter.   Honore, a Republican since the Reagan Administration and a registered Louisiana voter from his Zachary home, has spoken to friends and supporters in the last two weeks signaling that he is, according to one, “more than 50% sure that he will run.”

 

The item continues:

 

…one very senior Louisiana Republican predicted that if Honore runs, “He wins.”   As that GOP party elder further explained to the http://www.louisianaweekly.com/ and Bayoubuzz on the promise of confidentiality, “All he has to say is ‘Stuck on Stupid’, and Vitter is toast.” 

 

AT correspondent Elizabeth Weber Levy writes from Louisiana:

 

Some LA Republicans find the possibility of Honoré’s candidacy worrisome — he’s an unknown, save for his stellar milititary credentials and his skill during Katrina.  Others, however, are throwing confetti.

 

There are many obstacles to overcome if Gen. Honoré is to end up in the United States Senate two years before the next presidential election. Still, it could happen.

Read the rest of the article HERE:

 

End note:

I love the statement made by General Honore’ :  “Stuck on Stupid”, a comment being directed at a reporter. His comment of course applies to the press as a whole and on every subject they touch upon, not just the Hurricane Rita evacuation.

“This is a disaster. This isn’t something somebody can control. We ain’t stuck on stupid.”

The general describes himself as “African-American Creole” – a mixture of African, French, Spanish and Native American.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You Know Glenn Beck Is Zeroing In On RADICALS When…..IRAN spins his words!

 

IRAN is now trying to spin Glenn Beck’s Facts!

http://www.iranian.com/main/node/78537

What does that tell YOU America?

 

The Far Left is so laughable and predictable!

Part 1:

 

Part 2:

 

Part 3:

 

Part 4: Includes “In or OUT” 5 Pledges

 

Part 5: Includes Inspiration at the very end!

 

March on Washington, D.C.

http://912dc.org

For Local Protests:

http://teapartypatriots.org/

ObamaCare Will Cover Illegals. To The Legislative Branch: READ the BILL!

 

From: http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

ObamaCare Will Cover Illegals

Mark Tapscott says that among the many claims being made during the August recess by Democrats, from Obama to the lowliest back-bencher, is that ObamaCare absolutely, positively, cannot possibly ever in a million, zillion years provide coverage to illegal immigrants.

Just this past weekend during his regular Saturday address — devoted to addressing what he called “false claims about reform” — Obama said he wants “an honest debate” on health care reform, “not one dominated by willful misrepresentations and outright distortions.”

In what he called the “first myth” being spread by critics of his proposal for a government-run health care system, Obama said they are wrong in claiming illegal immigrants will be covered:  “That is not true.  Illegal immigrants would not be covered. That idea has not even been on the table.”  Obama said.

Well, that idea must have been tucked under a stack of background briefing papers over there in the corner of the table because the Congressional Research Service (CRS) says this about H.R. 3200, the ObamaCare bill approved just before the recess by the House Energy and Commerce Committee chaired by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-CA:
  

“Under H.R. 3200, a ‘Health Insurance Exchange’ would begin operation in 2013 and would offer private plans alongside a public option…H.R. 3200 does not contain any restrictions on non-citzens — whether legally or illegally present, or in the United States temporarily or permanently — participating in the Exchange.”

CRS also notes that the bill has no provision for requiring those seeking coverage or services to provided proof of citizenship. So, absent some major amendments to the legislation and a credible, concrete enforcement effort in action, looks like the myth on this issue is the one being spread by Obama, Reid, Pelosi, et. al.

 

End note:

Is Obama just being deceptive?  Or is he outright LYING to America?

You decide.

Glenn Beck gave AMERICA the 5 PLEDGES for Americans to take to their Congressional leaders in the House and Senate.  He suggested we (each) hand a copy of this to our leaders and simply ask them:  Do you AGREE with these BELIEFS?  If your politicians  DO NOT believe, support or reflect these beliefs in their ACTIONS (not just words), then they are not supporting YOU.

 

If they do; they are IN…….if they DON’T…..they are OUT in 2010.

http://interactive.foxnews.com/projects/inorout/

 

 

 

Bill In Congress (S.773) Would Give Obama Emergency Control of Internet

August 28, 2009 12:34 AM PDT

Bill would give president emergency control

 of Internet

Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.

They’re not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.

The new version would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for “cybersecurity professionals,” and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

“I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness,” said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. “It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill.”

Representatives of other large Internet and telecommunications companies expressed concerns about the bill in a teleconference with Rockefeller’s aides this week, but were not immediately available for interviews on Thursday.

A spokesman for Rockefeller also declined to comment on the record Thursday, saying that many people were unavailable because of the summer recess. A Senate source familiar with the bill compared the president’s power to take control of portions of the Internet to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001. The source said that one primary concern was the electrical grid, and what would happen if it were attacked from a broadband connection.

When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April, they claimed it was vital to protect national cybersecurity. “We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs–from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records,” Rockefeller said.

The Rockefeller proposal plays out against a broader concern in Washington, D.C., about the government’s role in cybersecurity. In May, President Obama acknowledged that the government is “not as prepared” as it should be to respond to disruptions and announced that a new cybersecurity coordinator position would be created inside the White House staff. Three months later, that post remains empty, one top cybersecurity aide has quit, and some wags have begun to wonder why a government that receives failing marks on cybersecurity should be trusted to instruct the private sector what to do.

Rockefeller’s revised legislation seeks to reshuffle the way the federal government addresses the topic. It requires a “cybersecurity workforce plan” from every federal agency, a “dashboard” pilot project, measurements of hiring effectiveness, and the implementation of a “comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy” in six months–even though its mandatory legal review will take a year to complete.

The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. “As soon as you’re saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it’s going to be a really big issue,” he says.

Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to “direct the national response to the cyber threat” if necessary for “the national defense and security.” The White House is supposed to engage in “periodic mapping” of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies “shall share” requested information with the federal government. (“Cyber” is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)

“The language has changed but it doesn’t contain any real additional limits,” EFF’s Tien says. “It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)…The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There’s no provision for any administrative process or review. That’s where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it.”

Translation: If your company is deemed “critical,” a new set of regulations kick in involving who you can hire, what information you must disclose, and when the government would exercise control over your computers or network.

Read the rest HERE.

End note:

COMMON SENSE would tell any American that the cybernet is already patrolled by the CIA and the FBI, right?

Don’t the CIA and FBI have the powers for search warrants under the “Patriot Act” to find the source of cyber attacks and follow through?

WHY does there need to be a bill in Congress pertaining to this other that to “control what Americans SEE and HEAR”…….?

S.773:     http://thomas.loc.gov

S.773
Title: A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and for other purposes.


Sponsor:
Sen Rockefeller, John D., IV [WV] (introduced 4/1/2009)      Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 4/1/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


COSPONSORS:

Senator Evan Baynh[IN] – 4/2/2009

 
 

 

 

 

Sen Nelson, Bill [FL] – 4/1/2009

 

 

 

 

Sen Snowe, Olympia J. [ME] – 4/1/2009

 

Section 2, #5:   John Brennan, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism (Counterterrorism Czar) wrote on March 2, 2009, that `our nation’s security and economic prosperity depend on the security, stability, and integrity of communications and information infrastructure that are largely privately-owned and globally-operated.’.

Section 2 #11: The Center for Strategic and International Studies report on Cybersecurity for the 44th Presidency concluded that (A) cybersecurity is now a major national security problem for the United States, (B) decisions and actions must respect privacy and civil liberties, and (C) only a comprehensive national security strategy that embraces both the domestic and international aspects of cybersecurity will make us more secure. The report continued stating that the United States faces `a long-term challenge in cyberspace from foreign intelligence agencies and militaries, criminals, and others, and that losing this struggle will wreak serious damage on the economic health and national security of the United States.’.

 

SEC. 5. STATE AND REGIONAL CYBERSECURITY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM.

 

    (a) CREATION AND SUPPORT OF CYBERSECURITY CENTERS- The Secretary of Commerce shall provide assistance for the creation and support of Regional Cybersecurity Centers for the promotion and implementation of cybersecurity standards. Each Center shall be affiliated with a United States-based nonprofit institution or organization, or consortium thereof, that applies for and is awarded financial assistance under this section.
    (b) PURPOSE- The purpose of the Centers is to enhance the cybersecurity of small and medium sized businesses in United States through–

 

  • (1) the transfer of cybersecurity standards, processes, technology, and techniques developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology to Centers and, through them, to small- and medium-sized companies throughout the United States;
  • (2) the participation of individuals from industry, universities, State governments, other Federal agencies, and, when appropriate, the Institute in cooperative technology transfer activities;

 

  • (3) efforts to make new cybersecurity technology, standards, and processes usable by United States-based small- and medium-sized companies;

 

  • (4) the active dissemination of scientific, engineering, technical, and management information about cybersecurity to industrial firms, including small- and medium-sized companies; and

 

  • (5) the utilization, when appropriate, of the expertise and capability that exists in Federal laboratories other than the Institute.
    (d) COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT- The Director shall–

 

(1) enforce compliance with the standards developed by the Institute under this section by software manufacturers, distributors, and vendors; and

 

(2) shall require each Federal agency, and each operator of an information system or network designated by the President as a critical infrastructure information system or network, periodically to demonstrate compliance with the standards established under this section.

 

    (e) FCC NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN- In developing the national broadband plan pursuant to section 6001(k) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the Federal Communications Commission shall report on the most effective and efficient means to ensure the cybersecurity of commercial broadband networks, including consideration of consumer education and outreach programs.

 

Did Mark Lloyd, the new FCC “Diversity Czar” have something to do with this?  Did Van Jones (his Color of Change.org has been trying to shut down Glenn Beck)?

John Brennan: Cybersecurity Czar

***Worked for Analysis Corp. at the same time the PASSPORT records of Obama,Clinton and McCain were “hacked”…….could it be to cover up Obama’s passport records as in traveling to Pakistan in 1981 (No AMERICA could travel to Pakistan then).

http://www.muckety.com/0E16974E5826B5C6CDF90B9F41A8E01E.map

John Brennan chief executive officer of the Analysis Corp. [was] rumored to be a possible candidate for CIA director in the Obama administration reports The Washington Post.

Brennan is a former top CIA official who helped establish the National Counterterrorism Center in 2004. He left the agency in 2005 to become CEO of Analysis Corp. …

Ironically in March an Analysis Corp. employee working at the State Department was accused of improperly accessing Barack Obama’s passport file. In a statement at the time Analysis Corp. said “We deeply regret that the incident occurred and believe it is an isolated incident.” …

He served as an advisor to the Obama campaign on national security and is the head of Obama’s intelligence transition team. …

http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/33920-1.html

http://www.prplace.com/pr_thread/view/id-2409

WHY would a President put in as a CyberSecurity Czar the CEO of a company that “hacked” your own passport records during his Presidential campaign?……UNLESS; he was given the order to do so by either Axelrod or Emanuel……

The Center for Strategic and International Studies 

1.  Sam Nunn; Chairman of the Center, a DIRECTOR at  GE, Director of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (lobbyist?), a director at Chevron corp, DELL, Inc.

2.  Zbigniew Brzezinski; Board Member of the International Crisis Group, Member of the Trilateral Commission, daughter Mika tied to NBC and MSNBC.

3.  The Pritzer Family Foundation with heavy ties to Chicago.

http://www.muckety.com/DD5C68624D6DABF50A0889A85C9FE299.map

Will the “private sector” computers include the leftist blogs like Huffington Post, Netroots Nation, The Open Left, My DD, Democracy NOW!, the SEIU blog, The Chief Organizer (Wade Rathke) blog?

Is this a way for an “end run” shut down of APPLE computer systems by Bill Gates of Microsoft?  Think about that for a minute.  Most computer systems run on “Windows” systems.  Bill Gates has been a major funder of the LEFT foundations and a major contributor to Obama.  If any intrustion software can be run and “kill switches” attached; it is as simple as allowing a “WINDOWS UPDATE” to load on your computer.

Or is this just a sinister way to shut down any opposing Obama internet systems?

The bill in Congress has a “broad” spectrum of what it includes that the overtaking of your computer is as quick as a Presidential pen stroke.

If the above is true……we are truly a Socialist nation headed to outright Communism!

 

 

Please Tell Me This Isn’t True! National Flag of CHINA to be Hoisted on South Lawn Of WHITE HOUSE on September 20th!

 

From CHINA DAILY news:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-07/13/content_8422505.htm

 
China’s national flag to go up in White House on Sept 20

By Hou Lei (chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2009-07-13

The national flag of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will be hoisted at the South Lawn of the White House in Washington on September 20, media reported Sunday.

Chinese associations in the United States had applied to hold a ceremony in front of the US President’s residence to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the founding of PRC.

Chen Ronghua, chairman of Fujian Association of the United States, told reporters that their application was approved not only because of the sound Sino-US relations but also because China is a responsible country.

“Many Americans admire China due to the success of last year’s Beijing Olympics,” said Chen.

More than 1,000 people will attend the ceremony and the performances held after it, according to Zhao Luqun, who will direct the performances.

Zhao said the performances will demonstrate the friendship, magnanimous spirit and kindness of modern Chinese people.

http://www.redcounty.com/white-house-fly-communist-chinese-flag

 

China’s national flag to fly outside White House

  • Source: Global Times
  • [23:39 July 13 2009]
  • Comments

By Wen Xian in Washington DC and Zhang Wen in Beijing

The national flag of the People’s Republic of China will be raised for the first time on the south lawn of the White House on September 20.

Overseas Chinese planned the ceremony in the US to celebrate China’s National Day, which falls on October 1.

“The ceremony has gotten official approval,” Xiao Shuigen, secretary of the Union of Chinese American Professional Organizations, said Sunday.

According to He Xiaohui, chairman of the Coordination Council of Chinese-American Associations, the ceremony is hosted by overseas Chinese organizations.

To celebrate the 60th birthday of China, and to express their love for the motherland, overseas Chinese will raise the Chinese flag at 10 am that day.

Chen Ronghua, chairman of the US-Fujian Association, was the proponent of the event.

“It was always my dream to raise a Chinese flag in the center of Washington DC,” he told the Global Times. “This year, my motherland’s 60th birthday, is the perfect time for it.”

“The ceremony getting official approval is due to the good relations between China and the US,” Chen said.

As well as the flag-raising ceremony, there will also be performances, with nearly 1,000 people participating, Zhao Luqun, the director of the ceremony, said.
 

http://world.globaltimes.cn/editor-picks/2009-07/446160.html

 

END NOTE:

PLEASE tell me America this isn’t true!

“magnanimous spirit and kindness of modern Chinese people.”

I guess Tiananmen Square means nothing to China.

In the months preceding the ten-year anniversary of the Tiananmen Square demonstrations Chinese government and party officials have reexamined and often revised the official version of the military crackdown. In April 1999, Zhu Muzhi, the president of the China Society for Human Rights Studies (a government think tank) observed that, “If the way we handled the Tiananmen crisis was incorrect, we would not have today’s prosperity. China would be in chaos. The people would have risen and resisted the government.” He added that, “At that time, the police were poorly equipped … They had never witnessed such large-scale protests … They did not have rubber bullets then nor gas masks… The only weapons they had were their guns.”

In a slightly more conciliatory gesture during his U.S. tour, President Zhu Rongji told reporters that, “The episode in 1989 [happened] because they wanted democracy but they didn’t want the rule of law.”

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB16/documents/index.html#30-35

China’s shutdown of Facebook is part of a larger social media trend where citizens are denied access to Facebook and Twitter as a means of enforcing state control over media. Google was also targeted in dramatic fashion on Chinese TV recently, when Google’s “autosuggest” search functionality was manipulated by Beijing to show how Google actually suggests that Chinese users search for porn online.

China’s government control over information is not just technological – its economic. China’s government exerts control over every significant business in the country. Companies in China must be majority owned by a Chinese citizen, and even then are heavily regulated by the government. All the major corporations in China, including telecommunications and media companies, are state owned entities or are majority owned by the state. This exerts a significant level of state influence on how people receive and send information.

http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/07/chinese-goverment-shuts-down-facebook/

 

September 20th is a SUNDAY.

Are they doing it on this day hoping America wouldn’t notice?

HOW many of our Legislative Branch will be there?

Will Hillary Clinton be there?

Is this a concession to China to take on more of our debt?

PLEASE…..someone give me a SANE answer!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 147 other followers