There’s More the Obama Pay Freeze than meets the Eye. Here’s the rest of the story

========================

November 30th, 2010

The campaign to paper over President Barack Obama’s big government tax-and-spend record with symbolic political triangulation has begun.

Yesterday, ahead of today’s meeting with House and Senate Republicans, President Obama attempted to preempt conservative calls for smaller government by announcing a Federal Employee Pay Freeze, which the White House says would save $2 billion over the rest of this fiscal year and $28 billion in cumulative savings over the next five years.

While the President’s political motivations are transparent to all, he should be congratulated on policy grounds for making two key concessions to reality: (1) that, as Heritage research has definitively shown, federal workers are paid more than their private sector counterparts even after accounting for skills and education; and (2) that our federal budget deficits are driven by a spending problem, not a revenue problem. That said, however, conservatives should be vigilant to make sure that the President’s federal pay proposals serve only as the beginning of negotiations and not as a false solution that prevents real federal pay reform next year.

A fact underreported by most newspapers today is that President Obama cannot freeze federal pay unilaterally.He is going to need Congress to act on his proposal, which calls for the freeze to begin effective January 1. This simply is not going to happen. Democrats still control both chambers of Congress, and the Democratic Party is controlled by government unions, which uniformly blasted the plan yesterday. With just one month left on the calendar to go, taking money away from the Democratic Party’s most powerful special interest group is just not going to make it onto an already very busy lame duck agenda.

Furthermore, President Obama’s freeze is really just a partial freeze that applies only to 2011 and 2012 cost of living increases.

[...]

Quick Hits:

http://blog.heritage.org/2010/11/30/morning-bell-dont-let-obama-pay-plan-freeze-real-reform/

====================================

So in symbolism to look like bipartisan over debt reduction:  Are Obama’s words just words?

Or will Obama TRUMP Congress once again by Executive Order?

Stay tuned.

=======================================

====================================

VERACITY……INTEGRITY……TENACITY.

VAN JONES EMCEES PROFANITY-LACED, BUSH-AND-BUSINESS-HATING, ‘GREEN’ POETRY SLAM

========================

November 30, 2010

by Jonathon M. Seidl

Guess where Van Jones is popping up now? The former Green Jobs Czar shared emcee duties at the Brave New Voices Speak Green poetry slam — a competition where “youth from around the country, ages 13 – 24, compete for the opportunity to travel on behalf of Youth Speaks to some of the key conferences and summits on the Environment to date.” The topic of this year’s event? Global warming.

As you’ll see, the young poets stayed on point. One blasted BP head Tony Hayward and made sure to include the “F” word and mock the man’s wife. Another said Bush didn’t deserve his second term, and alluded to the former President not caring about hurricane Katrina.

That’s where Van Jones comes in. This year’s annual poetry slam was held in L.A. and featured the deposed Green Czar. After the event, Jones spoke candidly about young people embracing the green movement as “social justice,” and how that’s been his plan for the last 10 years.

“To see young people, this new generation, they have a new vision for the environment,” he said. “They don’t see the distinction between social justice and the environment — they want to see healthy people and healthy planet. That‘s what I’ve been talking about for 10 years.”

He went on to call the poems and their messages “beautiful.” The full 11 minute video is below, featuring two poets and Jones at the end:

[Content WARNING: The following videos contain graphic language]

Here‘s the full video of the first young person’s poem chiding BP and Tony Hayward. The poet’s name is Ceez Live, a 19 year-old from Philadelphia:

More here……..

====================================

“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”

Adolf Hitler

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/adolfhitle378177.html

*****************************************

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are just NO LONGER SILENT.

VERACITY…..INTEGRITY…..TENACITY.

==============================

Wikileaks moving from Government Secrets to Financial/Corporate Secrets?

Forbes: “Early next year, Julian Assange says, a major American bank will suddenly find itself turned inside out. Tens of thousands of its internal documents will be exposed on Wikileaks.org with no polite requests for executives’ response or other forewarnings”

WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange Wants To Spill Your Corporate Secrets

Early next year, Julian Assange says, a major American bank will suddenly find itself turned inside out. Tens of thousands of its internal documents will be exposed on Wikileaks.org with no polite requests for executives’ response or other forewarnings. The data dump will lay bare the finance firm’s secrets on the Web for every customer, every competitor, every regulator to examine and pass judgment on.

(For the full transcript of Forbes’ interview with Assange click here.)

When? Which bank? What documents? Cagey as always, Assange won’t say, so his claim is impossible to verify. But he has always followed through on his threats. Sitting for a rare interview in a London garden flat on a rainy November day, he compares what he is ready to unleash to the damning e-mails that poured out of the Enron trial: a comprehensive vivisection of corporate bad behavior. “You could call it the ecosystem of corruption,” he says, refusing to characterize the coming release in more detail. “But it’s also all the regular decision making that turns a blind eye to and supports unethical practices: the oversight that’s not done, the priorities of executives, how they think they’re fulfilling their own self-interest.”

Having exposed military misconduct on a grand scale, he is now gunning for corporate America. Does Assange have unpublished, damaging documents on pharmaceutical companies? Yes, he says. Finance? Yes, many more than the single bank scandal we’ve been discussing. Energy? Plenty, on everything from BP to an Albanian oil firm that he says attempted to sabotage its competitors’ wells.

http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/11/29/wikileaks-julian-assange-wants-to-spill-your-corporate-secrets/

=============================

Okay, the government dump can be blamed on Pvt. Manning (the scapegoat)

BUT WHO gave Assange the information on Banks/Corporations?

Do any of YOU find this perplexing?

Do any of YOU find it interesting that the Center for American Progress literally has been mute about WIkileaks? Their National Security Page: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security

****Speak Up Only to “correct” misinformation put out by the Washington Times.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/11/29/washington-times-china-iran/ ****

Think Progress is a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. The Center for American Progress Action Fund is a nonpartisan organization. Through this blog, CAPAF seeks to provide a forum that advances progressive ideas and policies.

=============================

=======================

Assange HAS to HAVE Financial backing.  WHO or WHAT GROUP is funding Assange?

FOLLOW THE MONEY.

========================

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are just NO LONGER SILENT.

VERACITY….INTEGRITY…..TENACITY.

===========================


Voter Fraud at Play In Tight N.Y. Election?

============================

Voting Twice? Ballot Questions in Congressional Race

By Eric Shawn

November 29, 2010

The closest Congressional race in the nation could be decided by people who don’t really live in the district, and a Fox News investigation has uncovered evidence of voter registration illegalities, including one voter who apparently voted twice.

The candidates, Long Island Democratic incumbent Congressman Tim Bishop and Republican challenger Randy Altschuler, have been as close as just 15 votes apart, out of roughly 180,000 cast in New York’s 1st Congressional District. The latest count puts Democrat Bishop ahead by about 235 votes. But both sides are now challenging roughly 2,000 absentee ballots that will eventually determine if the seat stays Democratic or falls to the Republicans.

A Fox News Voter Fraud Unit review of approximately 438 of the absentee ballot voters, who also maintain mailing addresses in New York City, reveals that 48 have double registrations. They voted by absentee ballot in Suffolk County, but are also listed as current “active” voters on the New York City rolls. Being registered in two separate jurisdictions is illegal and is a felony in New York State.

In addition, our investigation reveals that one absentee ballot was apparently submitted in the name of a Democratic voter enrolled in Suffolk County, while election records at the Board of Elections in New York City show that the same voter voted, on Election Day, in Manhattan.

“It certainly is illegal to vote twice,” warns John Conklin, the spokesperson of the New York State Board of Elections, who said convictions can bring a one year jail sentence.

“If you voted twice, you committed a felony, and I think it would be very difficult to do that by accident. I think that would be something to be concerned about and that the district attorney is going to come knocking on their door.”

The voter in question has an extensive voting record, having cast a ballot in New York City 33 times since 1984. Records show he not only voted in a Manhattan polling place during the general election this past November, but also in the Democratic primary in September. The voter has not returned our request for comment.

The overwhelming majority of the Long Island voters, who are also on the New York City voter rolls, appear to be wealthy Manhattanites who own second-homes in the posh resort towns of East Hampton, Southampton, Montauk, Amagansett and Shelter Island. Many of them voted in Manhattan as recently as last November in New York City’s mayoral election, and in the presidential election of 2008.

Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/11/29/voting-twice-ballot-questions-congressional-race#ixzz16m7BfLXY

======================================

VERACITY….INTEGRITY…..TENACITY.

===================================

Dissecting the Smoke From Recent Wikileaks Dump; Meant to Confound or Feed a Silent Revolution?

=======================

Confound:  http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/confound

=======================

Step back America, take a deep breath and listen up.

DISSECT the “chaotic” news of Wikileaks and WHAT DO YOU FIND?

=======================

The man behind the Wikileaks page Julian Assange…….Assange’s attorney is Mark Stevens,……..

TRUST YOURSELF……DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK

Mutually Assured Economic Destruction……

Listen carefully from 10:33 to 11:07 min in video.

============================

Obamacare…..and the TRUTH about the UNIONS.

SEIU is allegedly collapsing the healthcare system to move toward their original goal of Single-payor system.

GM Stock……UAW protectionism?

****************************

S.510: Alleged “Food Safety” Bill

Massive expansion of Federal Regulation started by FDR. (Higher taxes and cost of food).

What Agriculture company PROFITS from the Bill?  MONSANTO.

FDA Deputy Commissioner for Food used to work for……MONSANTO.

Who is the second largest stock holder for MONSANTO shares?  GEORGE SOROS.

Control your food…….THEY control YOU.

==================================

Soros buys 897,813 Monsanto shares

November 17, 2010

Billionaire investor George Soros’ hedge fund bought 897,813 shares of Monsanto — his second-largest holding on a dollar basis — during the third quarter, The Wall Street Journal reports. The position is now valued at $312.6 million.

Read more: Soros buys 897,813 Monsanto shares | St. Louis Business Journal

============================

Union Drops Health Coverage for Workers’ Children

One of the largest union-administered health-insurance funds in New York is dropping coverage for the children of more than 30,000 low-wage home attendants, union officials said. The union blamed financial problems it said were caused by the state’s health department and new national health-insurance requirements.

The fund is administered by 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, an affiliate of the Service Employees International Union. Union officials said the state compelled the fund to start buying coverage from a third party, which increased premiums by 60%. State health officials denied forcing the union fund to make the switch, saying the fund had been struggling financially even before the switch to third-party coverage.

The fund informed its members late last month that their dependents will no longer be covered as of Jan. 1, 2011. Currently about 6,000 children are covered by the benefit fund, some until age 23.

The union fund faced a “dramatic shortfall” between what employers contributed to the fund and the premiums charged by its insurance provider, Fidelis Care, according to Mitra Behroozi, executive director of benefit and pension funds for 1199SEIU. The union fund pools contributions from several home-care agencies and then buys insurance from Fidelis.

“In addition, new federal health-care reform legislation requires plans with dependent coverage to expand that coverage up to age 26,” Behroozi wrote in a letter to members Oct. 22. “Our limited resources are already stretched as far as possible, and meeting this new requirement would be financially impossible.”

Behroozi estimated that the fund faced a $15 million shortfall in 2011 and more in the following years for the coverage of workers’ children.

The union said in a statement that the state required the fund to participate in a new program — the Family Health Plus Buy-In Program — beginning in 2008. The union said it expected that by joining the program, many of its members would qualify for state assistance for health-insurance coverage. “Instead they raised insurance rate increases without any increase in funding, and then cut Medicaid funding to the same workers nine times in the last three years,” the union said in a statement.

But the state denies requiring the union to join the program. “The state is not forcing 1199 to do anything regarding its employee health insurance,” said Jeffrey W. Hammond, spokesman for the New York Department of Health.

Read more HERE…..

So let me get this straight……

1.  Coverage is being dropped from their LOWEST wage earners. WHAT percentage of the “lowest wage earners” goes to healthcare coverage?

2.  The union “pools contributions from several home-care agencies.”  Contributions?  Do the home-care agencies realize what is happening here?

3.  Wasn’t the SEIU one of the UNIONS that was recently granted a waiver by Obama for healthcare?

SEIU Local 25 and 12 Other Union Groups Receive Obamacare Waivers

November 14, 2010

The Obama Administration recently handed out 111 Obamacare waivers to special US companies… And, they’re hiding this from the American public. It takes 6 clicks to find out this information on the government’s health care website.

Here is the list of the 111 special companies that were granted Obamacare waivers.

LINK

============================

DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK.  The information is out there; just LOOK for it.

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are just NO LONGER SILENT.

VERACITY……INTEGRITY……TENACITY.

==============================

Washington Set to Control Your Light Switch

=============================

by Tim Slagle

November 29, 2010

Ever since this continent was electrificated, Americans have been allowed to plug anything they want into their own electrical outlet.

[...]

When President Bush signed The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 we saw the first limits on which appliances we can use in our homes. (This bill is known by other names, such as the light bulb ban, or the 100 watt stockpiling act of 2012. It was spearheaded by GOP Rep. Fred Upton, who is this/close to assuming the Chairmanship of the Energy and Commerce Committee. That’s right, the GOP Rep who hates Thomas Edison is set to create energy policy for the whole country.) The law was necessary, because most Americans prefer incandescent bulbs. They are more aesthetically pleasing, and help heat your home in the winter. Most people believe the extra money spent is well worth the cost of electricity. After all, what is more economical than sitting in the dark?

The next step in Green won’t even require Congressional approval. The Department of Energy recently decided they have authority over appliances in your home. Energy Secretary Steven Chu recently issued five new energy efficiency standards for large appliances, and is reworking the policy to include ten new categories. According to Assistant Energy Secretary Cathy Zoi “…we have a mandate. Where we can actually just issue regulations and do market transformation.”

It is like we are moving backwards in time, seeing modern life outlawed one convenience at a time. Right now social engineers are busy working on “Smart Grid” technology. (The perennial question: if environmental choices are actually so intelligent, why do the marketers have to convince us, with names like “Smart Car,” and “Insight?”) The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 set aside $11 billion dollars to begin construction of that grid.

Smart Grid sounds harmless and modern, but it will be incredibly intrusive. Appliances in the future will have microchips installed; when you plug them in, they will handshake with the grid, and a central authority will determine whether that appliance deserves to get power or not. If a bureaucrat in Washington decides that it’s not hot enough for you to put on the air conditioner, your air conditioner will not work. If the Fed decides that Margaritas lead to too much trouble on Cinco de Mayo, all blenders can be disabled for the day.

They can also turn off radios, televisions and computers. In the era of electronic information, restricting the freedom of the press is as easy as turning off the light. The idea is to conserve power, but a Smart Government will be able to use the technology to retain power as well.

And as for my beautiful pink basement refrigerator, you can forget that. In fact every appliance that was built before the smart grid will eventually be forbidden power. Which means that once the “Smart” Grid is fully operational, everything in your house that requires a plug will probably need to be replaced –including your hysteria device (which will also leave a record the central office, every time it’s turned on).

There is no question that Air Conditioners in Washington DC will be functional year round, while those of us out  in Red State American will deal with the limitations of windmills that are incapable of keeping the entire nation cool in the stagnant summer air.

Isn’t technology wonderful?

http://biggovernment.com/tslagle/2010/11/29/washington-set-to-control-your-light-switch/

==========================

Will there be a run on solar generators soon?

At least the government can’t control the SUN.

*******************************

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are just NO LONGER SILENT.

VERACITY……INTEGRITY……TENACITY.

=================================


Sen.Dick Lugar … The Untouchable and the NYT’s Favorite Republican “Maverick”?

==========================

NOVEMBER 29, 2010

BY ED MORRISSEY

The New York Times seems to have found itself a new favorite Republican.

Yesterday the newspaper profiled Senator Dick Lugar, whose seat comes up for voter review in 2012, by noting that Lugar has been a “reliable conservative for decades” and that “mavericks are not in vogue these days on Capitol Hill,” two contradictory statements separated by — I kid you not — one single sentence in Jennifer Steinhauer’s profile of Lugar. As Glenn Reynolds notes, it’s not the only point that screams out for a copy editor, but that’s not the biggest problem in this profile by far:

Now, in the heat of the post-primary lame-duck Congressional session, he is defying his party on an earmark ban, a bill that would create a path to citizenship for some illegal immigrants, a military spending authorization bill and an arms control treaty with Russia.

He even declined to sign a brief supporting state lawsuits againsPresident Obama’s health care law because he saw it as political posturing.

Now Mr. Lugar’s willingness to buck his party is leading to talk that he will face a primary challenge from a Tea Party candidate when he runs for re-election in 2012. It is a possibility that Mr. Lugar, who said the current environment in Washington was “disappointing” and “without a doubt” the most polarized he had seen since joining the Senate in 1977, understands clearly even as he declines to modify his positions. …

Even after the midterm rout that will remove many long-serving members from Congress, the idea that Mr. Lugar would be vulnerable to a primary challenge is a chilling notion to many Republicans, a symbol of symbolism gone too far.

“If Dick Lugar,” said John C. Danforth, a former Republican senator from Missouri, “having served five terms in the U.S. Senate and being the most respected person in the Senate and the leading authority on foreign policy, is seriously challenged by anybody in the Republican Party, we have gone so far overboard that we are beyond redemption.”

Let’s move past the “symbol of symbolism” and the urge to start sentences with “Now,” for a moment.  Since when is Dick Lugar the canary in the coal mine for Republicanism?  I’m not a Lugar hater by any stretch; he’s a six-term Senator and has done some good work on Capitol Hill for the GOP.  However, Republicans around the country have made clear that they want ObamaCare challenged by every legal means at hand — and a large number of independents feel the same way.  If Lugar doesn’t represent the will of the electorate, then he doesn’t belong in office.

More here………

=================================

Should Lugar be added to the RINO list?

Sen. Susan Collins

Sen. Olympia Snowe

Sen. Lindsay Graham

Sen. John McCain

Sen. Dick Lugar  ???

==================================

The ABOVE is very good support to have TERM LIMITS for Congress!

==================================

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are just NO LONGER SILENT.

VERACITY…….INTEGRITY…..TENACITY.

=================================


Breaking! Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie’s Communist Party Connection to be Exposed

=======================

Posted with permission and assistance from Trevor Loudon of:

http://www.newzeal.blogspot.com

AND

http://keywiki.org

=======================

Breaking! Mark Ritchie’s Communist Party Connection to be Exposed


At 9am EST Tuesday November 30, 2010, New Zeal will post documentary evidence linking Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, to the Communist Party USA.

Why is this important?

A key part of Mark Ritchie’s job is to oversee electoral recounts in Minnesota.

In early 2009 Mark Ritchie judged that his Wellstone Action Advisory Committee and Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party colleague Al Franken had won a Minnesota U.S. Senate seat, even though Republican opponent Norm Coleman was ahead on election night.

The recount was dogged with controversy, with allegations that felon’s votes were illegally counted.

Currently, Mark Ritchie is overseeing another election recount. This could give the Minnesota governorship to another of Ritchie’s Wellstone Action Advisory Committee and Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party colleagues, Mark Dayton.

One of the Communist Party USA members linked to Mark Ritchie, labor leader Mark Froemke used his union to endorse Al Franken.

In October 2009 Mark Froemke was the Fargo Moorehead organizer for a 10 Days of Labor Action campaign in support of Minnesota gubernatorial candidate Mark Dayton.

The Communist Party has infiltrated the Democratic Party in several states and openly supports the Democrats against the Republicans in its publications.

The fact that Mark Ritchie has documented covert ties to the Communist Party USA must bring his neutrality as an election overseer into severe doubt.

The voters of Minnesota deserve better.

Mark Ritchie File 1 here
Mark Ritchie File 2 here
Mark Ritchie File 3 here
Mark Ritchie File 4 here

Check New Zeal at 9am EST Tuesday.

Please share this post on Facebook, Twitter, email… so that we can get the word out far and wide that Mark Ritchie is unsuitable to be overseeing this contested election.

================================

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are JUST NO LONGER SILENT.

VERACITY……INTEGRITY…..TENACITY.

===========================

Red Democrats File 1 – Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Ca.) Sponsored Communist Party Event and Woolsey’s Other Affiliations

=====================

Posted with permission and assistance from Trevor Loudon of:

http://www.newzeal.blogspot.com

AND

http://keywiki.org

===============================

Red Democrats File 1 – Lynn Woolsey Sponsored Communist Party Event


Several members of the approximately eighty strong, far left Congressional Progressive Caucus have documentable ties to the Communist Party USA, or its front organizations.

These include, but are certainly not limited to, Caucus vice chair Dennis Kucinich, Caucus founder and Senate member Bernie Sanders and house members Corrine Brown, John Conyers, Danny Davis, Rosa DeLauro, Barney Frank, Jesse Jackson, Jr. Barbara Lee, Charles Rangel, Bobby Rush and Maxine Waters


Here’s another for the list – none other than Progressive Caucus co-chair and California 6th district Rep. Lynn Woolsey.

Below is a scan from the Communist Party’s newspaper People’s Weekly World from September 11 1999, advertising a People’s Weekly World Gala Banquet. Woolsey is listed as a co-sponsor of the event:


Here’s a close up.


Of those listed above Woolsey, identified Communist Party members or supporters include Cassandra Lopez, Juan Lopez, (identified on the advertisement as “chair, N. Calif. District CPUSA” Bob Martin, Coleman D. Persily, Michael Parenti , Avelino Ramos,
Nell Ranta, Gail Ryall, Anthony Toney and Doris Brin Walker.

Also listed on the left portion of the advertisement were long time communist front supporter Rep. Barbara Lee and more well known communists, including Arnold Becchetti, Marilyn Bechtel, Delmer Berg , Libero Della Piana and Herb Kaye (aka) Herb Kransdorf.


Lynn Woolsey is an influential Democrat. She serves on several Congressional Committees, including;

  • Committee on Education and Labor

  • Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education

  • Subcommittee on Workforce Protections (Chairwoman)

  • Committee on Foreign Affairs

  • Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health

  • Committee on Science and Technology

  • Subcommittee on Energy and Environment

Once Lynn Woolsey would have immediately be flagged as a security risk, for openly supporting a Communist Party fund raiser.

Today, the Communist Party supports Cuba and China and strongly opposes the U.S. war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Why then, would a loyal U.S. congresswoman be prepared to co-sponsor a Communist Party event?

================================

From Discoverthenetworks.org:

Lynn Woolsey:

Woolsey belongs to the Progressive Caucus in the House of Representatives. Her voting record, according to Americans for Democratic Action, is between 95% and 100% on the left side of legislation.

During her congressional career, Woolsey has voted:

  • against the development of a national missile defense system;
  • against the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001;
  • against the post-9/11 anti-terrorism measure known as the Patriot Act;
  • against allowing the U.S. government to use electronic surveillance to investigate suspected terrorist operatives;
  • against a bill permitting the government to combat potential terrorist threats by monitoring foreign electronic communications which are routed through the United States;
  • against an October 2002 joint resolution authorizing U.S. military action in Iraq;
  • against the establishment of military commissions to try enemy combatants captured in the war on terror;
  • in favor of withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq immediately and by a preordained date;
  • against President Bush’s 2007 decision to deploy some 21,500 additional U.S. soldiers in an effort to quell the violent insurgents in Iraq;
  • in favor of a proposal to expedite the transfer of all prisoners in the Guantanamo Bay detention center;
  • against requiring hospitals to report (to the federal government) illegal aliens who receive emergency medical treatment;
  • against the Real ID Act, which proposed to set minimal security requirements for state driver licenses and identification cards;
  • against separate proposals calling for the construction of some 700 miles of fencing to prevent illegal immigration along America’s southern border;
  • against a proposal to grant state and local officials the authority to investigate, identify, and arrest illegal immigrants;
  • against major tax cut proposals in September 1998February 2000March 2000July 2000May 2001May 2003October 2004, and May 2006;
  • against separate welfare reform bills designed to move people off the welfare rolls and into paying jobs;
  • in favor of prohibiting oil and gas exploration in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR); and
  • against a proposal to fund offshore oil exploration along the Outer Continental Shelf.

Woolsey, who co-chairs the Democratic Caucus Task Force on Welfare Reform, fought against the 1996 welfare-reform act.

In September 2000 Woolsey sponsored H.R. 4892, “The Scouting for All Act,” which called for a revocation of the congressional charter held by the Boy Scouts of America since 1916. “We’re not saying the Boy Scouts are bad,” Woolsey explained. “We’re saying that intolerance is bad” – a reference to the fact that the Boy Scouts do not wish to include homosexuals either as members or as troop leaders.

On December 2, 2003, Woolsey wrote a letter (on her official congressional stationery) on behalf of Stewart Pearson, the son of a senior aide in her office. Pearson had recently pleaded guilty to rape. In the letter, Woolsey asked the presiding judge to consider mitigating circumstances and to impose a light sentence. The judge ultimately sentenced Pearson to the maximum of eight years in prison. When reports of Woolsey’s letter became public, she apologized for having written it.

*******In December 2007 Woolsey, along with 8 fellow Democrats, voted against a resolution to formally recognize the importance of “Christmas and the Christian faith.” Earlier that year, by contrast, she had voted to “recognize the commencement of [the Islamic holy month] Ramadan” and the Hindu religious holiday Diwali.*****

LINK

================================

Obama and the MarxistSocialist radical members of Congress (Updated 2x)

October 22, 2008 by Brenda J. Elliott

[Excerpted: Read full article at LINK below]

Sanders, DeFazio, and Waters are members of what is now called the Congressional Progressive Congress.

DSA hosted CPC

Would it surprise you to know that the Democratic Socialists of America hosted the CPC on its website?

For this latter piece of information we turn to a May 24, 2008, post at Theodore’s World blog:

Until 1999, DSA hosted the website of the Progressive Caucus. Following a subsequent expose of the link between the two entities, the Progressive Caucus established its own website under the auspices of Congress. But DSA and the Progressive Caucus remain intimately linked. All 58 Progressive Caucus members also belong to DSA.

The CPC’s “own website” for the current 71-member CPC is an extension of that maintained for its co-chairwoman, Rep. Barbara Lee (Calif.) — cpc.lee.house. The other CPC co-chairwoman is fellow Californian, Rep. Lynn Woolsey.

The CPC-DSA relationship was confirmed by Trevor Loudon in his November 12, 2006, article The Socialists Behind the “Progressive Caucus”:

As the Congressional Progressive Caucus is the most powerful and radical group in the new US Congress, it might be useful to find out who is behind the organisation.

The most obvious backers of the CPC are the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

Loudon cited the Wikipedia article on the DSA:

During the 1990s, DSA began looking to the Religious Right’s activism within the Republican Party as a model for how the Left could gain a greater foothold within the Democratic Party…

The result was the “Congressional Progressive Caucus, a group of 65 Democratic legislators in the U.S. House of Representatives anchored by US Rep. Bernie Sanders, a DSA sympathizer….DSA’s website included commentary supportive of the legislative caucus throughout much of the late 1990s.

CPC supporters

The Wikipedia article on the CPC also provides the names of a number of organizations which support the CPC.

Included in the “array of national progressive organizations” that “work to support the efforts of the caucus” we find a few that top the list.

  • Institute for Policy Studies (IPS)
  • The Nation magazine
  • Progressive Democrats of America (PDA)

LINK

==========================

 

On the Congressional Progressive Caucus’ OWN WEBSITE:

Links & Resources

 


=============================

 

For those inquiring minds that want to know:

List of Caucus Members as of June 2, 2010

***NOTE HAS CHANGED SINCE NOVEMBER 2, 2010 ELECTIONS****

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?ContentID=166&ParentID=0&SectionID=4&SectionTree=4&lnk=b&ItemID=164

==================================

==================================

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are just NO LONGER SILENT.

VERACITY…….INTEGRITY…….TENACITY.

==========================


Union Complains That Chinese Workers Are Building New MLK Memorial in Washington

==================

CNSNEWS.com reports:

Wednesday, November 24, 2010
By Susan Jones

(CNSNews.com) -  In September, the foundation building the $120-million Martin Luther King memorial on the Mall promised in writing to use local stonemasons to assemble and install the 159 blocks of granite that will make up two massive sculptures at the center of the site, including one bearing King’s likeness, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

But when construction of the sculptures began three weeks ago, Chinese laborers were brought in to do the work, and now members of the local stonemason’s union are demanding that their leaders investigate.

“The possibility that cheap imported labor was being used to build any portion of the King memorial was anathema to them,” the Washington Post reported. “King was assassinated in 1968 while in Memphis to support a sanitation workers strike.”

“Why do they need to come over to do the work when there are so many people here who can do it?” the newspaper quoted Scott Garvin, president of the Washington area local of the Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers union, as saying. His union’s membership has dropped in the past three years from 2,000 to 850 because of a decline in building projects.

The prevailing wage for an American stonemason is $32 an hour, plus $12 an hour in benefits, the Post reported. Union officials doubt the imported Chinese workers are being paid anything close to that.

Read Newspaper Roundup and See Washington Post article

===============================

Could it POSSIBLY be that the cost of $44/Hour is a BIT MUCH per worker for this project?

Is this a Federal project or a Private Enterprise/Foundation’s project?

ANSWER: a Private FOUNDATION.  Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial Project Foundation, Inc.

****************************

Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial Project Foundation

The process of designing, funding and constructing the memorial was coordinated by a nonprofit organization, the Washington, D.C.-based Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial Project Foundation. At present, fundraising efforts for the memorial have been completed, and the foundation has secured final construction permits. The foundation’s leaders estimate the memorial will take 20 months to complete with a total cost of $120 million USD.

LINK

==================================

To digress a moment:

Look WHO is on the Executive Leadership Cabinet for this project:

Franklin D. Raines (Former Fannie Mae executive given golden parachute when Fannie was headed south)
Director
Revolution Health Group

http://www.mlkmemorial.org/site/c.hkIUL9MVJxE/b.1190575/k.5D0A/Foundation_Leadership.htm


Franklin Raines was a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Fannie Mae. He served as President Bill Clinton’s Budget Director. Raines was forced to retire from his position with Fannie Mae  when auditing discovered severe irregulaties in Fannie Mae’s accounting activities. At the time of his departure The Wall Street Journal noted, “ Raines, who long defended the company’s accounting despite mounting evidence that it wasn’t proper, issued a statement late Tuesday conceding that“mistakes were made” and saying he would assume responsibility as he had earlier promised. News reports indicate the company was under growing pressure from regulators to shake up its management in the wake of findings that the company’s books ran afoul of generally accepted accounting principles for four years.”



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2006/02/23/DI2006022301805.html

********************

Raines left with a “golden parachute valued at $240 Million in benefits. The Goverment filed suit against Raines when the depth of the acounting scandel became clear . The Government noted, “The 101 charges reveal how the individuals improperly manipulated earnings to maximize their bonuses, while knowingly neglecting accounting systems and internal controls, misapplying over twenty accounting principles and misleading the regulator and the public. The Notice explains how they submitted six years of misleading and inaccurate accounting statements and inaccurate capital reports that enabled them to grow Fannie Mae in an unsafe and unsound manner.” These charges were made in 2006.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/07/business/07fannie.html?ex=1323147600&en=14bcda881f8f1805&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

==============================

================================

Back to SUBJECT of post:

====================================

NOW the Unions might understand how unemployed AMERICAN CITIZENS feel when illegal immigrants take their jobs.

************************************

Quoted from Scott Garvin, president of the Washington area local of the Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers union:

“Why do they need to come over to do the work when there are so many people here who can do it?”

*********************************

The same UNIONS that push for the DREAM act/immigration reform/healthcare for illegals and are anti-Arizona SB1070.

==============================

===============================

====================

=============

VERACITY…….INTEGRITY……TENACITY.

*******************************************************



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 147 other followers