America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the Benghazi Heroes Told to “Stand Down”…Thinks Four Americans were “Expendable”…How Does Obama View YOU? **UPDATES October 28, 2012**

=============

=========================

**UPDATES at end of this post**

=====================

The Benghazi gun running from Libya to Syria via Turkey makes Fast and Furious look like child’s play.

Media malpractice is protecting Obama in all of this. Only TRUE reporting is coming from Fox News. Pay attention America.

=====================

This will be laid out in FOUR Parts for you to get the true picture.

Part #1:

From Canada Free Press:

The hidden real truth about Benghazi

By Doug Hagmann

October 26, 2012

Most people know that we’ve been lied to about the attacks in Benghazi, but few realize the extent of those lies or the hidden secrets they cover. After all, the lie is different at every level. Thanks to a well placed source with extensive knowledge about the attack, the disturbing truth is slowly beginning to emerge and is lining up with information contained in my previous articles published here weeks ago (HereHere and Here). The truth reveals the most serious situation in the world today as it involves the interests and destinies of us all.

A mosaic of lies

According to the U.S. government, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed during a spontaneous protest at the consulate office in Benghazi by a frenzied crowd of Muslims outraged over an obscure internet video. Recently released “sensitive but not classified e-mails” from Stevens to the U.S. Department of State painted a picture of poor security for U.S. personnel and the embassy, which was obviously true but had little to do with the events of September 11, 2012. The failure to dispatch an extraction team or otherwise rescue the men during a firefight that lasted upwards of nine grueling and tortuous hours was not the result of any intelligence failure, but caused by our unwillingness to widen the conflict and expose the nature and scale of our true mission in Benghazi.

Based on information provided by my source and corroborated elsewhere, the official account by administration officials is a mosaic of lies that were necessary to cover the unpalatable truth of covert actions taking place in Libya, Syria, Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. The primary objective of our covert actions was to secretly arm anti-Assad “rebels” in Syria by funneling arms from Libya to Syria via Turkey, with other destinations that included Jordan and Lebanon.  Regarding the threat to Stevens and the other murdered Americans, the truth will reformat the persistent question posed to government officials, from UN Ambassador Susan Rice to White House Spokesman Jay Carney and others from “how could you not have known” to “how could you have done these things?”

First, it is important to understand that Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were not killed at a consulate office in Benghazi—as there is not such office there. They died at one of the largest CIA operations centers in the Middle East, which was located in Benghazi and served as the logistics headquarters for arms and weapons being shipped out of the post-Qaddafi Libya.

Although the U.S. government insisted that Stevens was involved in securing and destroying the numerous caches of arms and weapons once under the control of Qaddafi, the operation was more complex than that. The visual accounts of weapons being destroyed were indeed real, but those weapons were not operational. The working weapons were actually separated and transported to holding facilities for their eventual use in Syria. Russia was fully aware of this operation and warned the U.S. not to engage in the destabilization of Syria, as doing so would endanger their national security interests. Deposing Assad, as despotic as he might be, and replacing him with a Muslim Brotherhood-led regime would likely lead to unrestrained Islamic chaos across the region.

The Turkish warning

According to my source, Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 to meet with his Turkish counterpart, who reportedly warned Stevens that the operation was compromised. They met in person so that Stevens could be shown overhead satellite images, taken by the Russians, of nefarious activities taking place in Turkey. But just what were these nefarious activities?

It is reasonable to suspect that these activities were more dire than just your average “gun running” operation. Since the overthrow of Qaddafi, it is estimated that upwards of 40 million tons of weapons and arms were shipped out of Libya to Syria. But it was also known inside intelligence circles that Qaddafi possessed chemical weapons in addition to numerous surface-to-air missiles. Could it be that Russia obtained unmistakable surveillance footage of the anti-Assad “rebels” being shown how to load chemical payloads onto missiles inside Turkey near the border of Syria? Weapons, of course, that were shipped from Libya by the CIA in conjunction with various Muslim Brotherhood rebel groups.  If so, such weapons could be used as a “false flag” type of operation—one that would be implemented to “set-up” Assad by making it appear that he was using these weapons on forces dedicated to his overthrow.

The blowback by the international community would be swift and punishing, and the entirety of the civilized world would be demanding his overthrow. NATO would then be used to expedite his ouster, and Russia’s moral position within the international community would be weakened. Was the meeting held to show Stevens that the operation was compromised and that they had to stop?

A Nation/State sponsored attack?

While the administration asserts that the attack in Benghazi was conducted by a group of rebels acting alone, the facts seem to indicate otherwise. The level of coordination was such that we did not deploy military assets, located just an hour or two away by air, to rescue Stevens and the others at the CIA operations center in their time of need. If, as the administration contends, that the attack was perpetuated by a group of frenzied rebels, our military could have easily handled them in short order. So why was there no rescue operation?

Perhaps the statements made yesterday by Leon Panetta, U.S. Secretary of Defense provides some insight if one analyzes the essence of those statements. Among other things, Panetta said that “…the basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on…” Well, it has been confirmed we did know what was taking place on the ground in Benghazi, so exactly what did Panetta mean by this statement?

Keep reading here……….

==============================

On 9/11, while under attack by mortar fire and RPG’s from jihaist islamic terrorists……THIS happened.

Part #2:

EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say

By 

October 26, 2012

Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA chain of command — who also told the CIA operators twice to “stand down” rather than help the ambassador’s team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.

Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to “stand down,” according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to “stand down.”

Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged. The rescue team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.

At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Spectre gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights.

CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood, though, denied the claims that requests for support were turned down.

“We can say with confidence that the Agency reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible evening in Benghazi,” she said. “Moreover, no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate.  In fact, it is important to remember how many lives were saved by courageous Americans who put their own safety at risk that night-and that some of those selfless Americans gave their lives in the effort to rescue their comrades.”

The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.

Keep reading here including video:

=============================

Part #3:

From the PJ Tattler:

AC-130U Gunship was On-Scene in Benghazi, Obama Admin Refused to Let It Fire (Updated)

by Bob Owens

October 26, 2012

If you don’t get torches-and-pitchforks irate about this, you are not an American:

The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.

==

There were two AC-130Us deployed to Libya in March as part ofOperation Unified Protector.

The AC-130U is a very effective third-generation fire-support aircraft, capable of continuous and extremely accurate fire onto multiple targets. It has been used numerous times in Iraq and Afghanistan to save pinned-down allied forces, and has even been credited with the surrender of the Taliban city of Kunduz

It was purpose-built for a select number of specific mission types, including point-defense against enemy attack. It was literally built for the kind of mission it could have engaged in over Benghazi, if the administration had let it fire. As the excerpt above clearly shows, we had assets on the ground “painting” the targets with the laser.

An AC-130U flies in a counter-clockwise “pivot turn” around the target, with the weapons all aimed out the left side of the aircraft.

There are two state-of-the-art fire-control systems (FCSs) in a AC-130U, using television sensors,infrared sensors, and synthetic aperture strike radar. These fire control systems can see through the dark of night, clouds, and smoke.

The two FCSs on the AC-130U control a 25mm Gatling gun for area suppression, a precision 40mm cannon, and a 105mm cannon which can engage hard targets.

What this means is that we have the forces in the air and on the ground to have stopped the attack at any point, eliminating the terrorists and saving American lives.

More here including video:

UpdateBlackFive confirmed with a retired Delta operator: The fact that ground personnel were painting the target says there was a Spectre on station.

Having spent a good bit of time nursing a GLD (ground Laser Designator) in several garden spots around the world, something from the report jumped out at me.
One of the former SEALs was actively painting the target.  That means that Specter WAS ON STATION!  Probably an AC130U.  A ground laser designator is not a briefing pointer laser.  You do not “paint” a target until the weapons system/designator is synched; which means that the AC130 was on station.
Only two places could have called off the attack at that point; the WH situation command (based on POTUS direction) or AFRICOM commander based on information directly from the target area.
If the AC130 never left Sigonella (as Penetta [sic] says) that means that the Predator that was filming the whole thing was armed.

If that SEAL was actively “painting” a target; something was on station to engage!  And the decision to stand down goes directly to POTUS!

===============================

Part #4:

Obama is responsible for the deaths of at least 4 US citizens in Benghazi.

Benghazi Ambassadorial Staff: Obama Determined They Were Expendable

By  Sher Zieve

October 26, 2012

 It was reported and revealed this morning on Fox News’ Happening Now Breaking news that the CIA in Benghazi, Libya had at least twice on 11 September 2012 requested from their superiors in the US help for the consulate’s employees. The CIA employees told the Obama official—who was likely already viewing the attacks live from the safety of his or her own offices—that Ambassador Stevens, his staff and 2 security people were in jeopardy of being killed by the ongoing Islamists’ assault.

The first time the Obama official was contacted for assistance, CIA Benghazi was told “No. Stand down!” 1-2 hours later, CIA Benghazi again contacted the Obama official again and begged for help they were again told to “stand down” and advised that no help would be forthcoming. The assault went on for 7 long—and torturous for those having to endure it—hours, during which time the CIA on the ground in Libya made several more calls for help. All of their requests for the lives of the Ambassadorial staff were refused. To make matters worse—if that’s even possible—the CIA employees on-site were told via the “stand down” order that they were not to help them, in any way whatsoever, either.

Ambassador Stevens and his staff were allowed—if not meant—to die. Obama is to blame. Any decision of the magnitude of this one—allowing the deaths of US citizens by apparent design and planning—would have to be authorized by the Commander-in-Chief. I have heard for the last 1-2 weeks and have reported on Radio two stories that may explain the reason for Obama’s belief that they had to die. First, there is the story—reported on 14 October by the NY Times—that Stevens was assisting Obama on the supply of arms to Islamists in Syria. Second, there is the story that Obama planned to have Stevens “kidnapped” (so that Obama would step in as the “hero” and save him) but, the plan went awry.

Due to the upcoming elections, Obama could not be implicated in any additional scandal. But he was. And he now is.

Whatever the truth of this, there is an undeniable fact. Obama is responsible for the deaths of at least 4 US citizens in Benghazi. He is directly responsible. This is the highest form of “High crimes and misdemeanors,” as given in the definition of treason. Obama is guilty of it and is still being protected by a thoroughly corrupt media and many members of Congress. He belongs in prison…not our White House.

SOURCE: Canada Free Press

===============================

***UPDATES*** October 28, 2012

Developing, Disturbing: Syrian Rebels (Who May Be Al Qaeda) Have Been Given U.S. Stinger Missiles

Excerpted:

Related: Obama Caught Arming Al Qaeda, Reason For Libya Cover-Up

Are these the arms Obama was selling that caused the Benghazi cover-up? And what trusted individual in the laughable Team Obama’s State Department vetted these rebels to not be Al Qaeda? Or are they Al Qaeda and Obama doesn’t care?

Excerpted from The Hill: Russia’s top general said Wednesday that the Syrian opposition has received shoulder-launched missiles, including stinger missiles made in the United States.

Russian chief of staff Gen. Nikolai Makarov said the missiles were a “serious matter,” although he added that he did not know where the weapons had come from.

Russia, an arms supplier to Syria, has backed Syrian President Bashar Assad throughout the conflict, and Moscow has stymied U.S. efforts in the U.N. Security Council to take stronger measures against Assad.

“We have information that the rebels fighting the Syrian army have shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles of several states, including Stingers made in the United States,” Makravo was quoted as saying by Russia’s Interfax news agency, according to Agence France-Presse.

“We need to still find out who has delivered them,” he said.

=====================

UPDATE #2:

New Executive Order signed – why now? Benghazi…election?

***************

Read the Executive Order here on the White House web site.

Obama signs new Executive Order expanding Homeland Security mission in the U.S.

By Kenneth Schortgen, Jr. – Examiner

On Oct. 26, President Obama signed a new Executive Order which expands the role and scope of Homeland Security in states and areas across the country. This order, which establishes a new Security Partnership Council, will have far reaching effects in the overall mission of Homeland Security, and for state and local areas that interact with the Federal agency.

Economically, the Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council Executive Order will increase funding and resources to state and local governments to fulfill Homeland Security programs and doctrines, as well as increase Federal oversight in the implementation of directives tied to the agencies mission.

The purpose of this order is to maximize the Federal Government’s ability to develop local partnerships in the United States to support homeland security priorities. Partnerships are collaborative working relationships in which the goals, structure, and roles and responsibilities of the relationships are mutually determined.

There is established a White House Homeland Security Partnership Council (Council) to foster local partnerships — between the Federal Government and the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and law enforcement – to address homeland security challenges.

Sec. 3. Mission and Function of the Council and Steering Committee

(ii) promote homeland security priorities and opportunities for collaboration between Federal Government field offices and State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders;

(iii) advise and confer with State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders and agencies interested in expanding or building local homeland security partnerships; - Whitehouse.gov

Since it’s creation in 2001 from the aftermath of 9/11, the Department of Homeland Security has expanded its authority over states, communities, and law enforcement each year. From expanding TSA responsibilities over airport transportation to now include trains, subways, and even highway checkpoints, to new regulations in how border control agents function in immigration conflicts, Homeland Security is one of the fastest growing government agencies in the past decade.

Through creating a new Steering Committee in partnership with how Homeland Security missions, directives, and programs are implemented in state and local levels, the fine line between state sovereignty and the need protect the country from disaster and terror attacks is becoming smaller every day. Over the past few years Homeland Security grants to local law enforcement have led to a militarization of police and public safety, and new drone technology is being used in criminal investigations outside the scope of national security.

================================

If YOU don’t think the media is corrupt, biased and truly the Obama protectionist squad…..WHY do you not even HEAR about this on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, when the journalists there have FULL KNOWLEDGE of this? They have observers that watch and monitor Fox News that has been reporting this for days……

If it really came down to it; would Obama and his ilk consider YOU expendable?

Knowing that Obama has FULL Knowledge of the Benghazi, Libya attack and can look squarely into a camera and LIE to the American people; how can we, as Americans……TRUST HIM with our lives and our future?

==============================

======================

About these ads

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/america-if-the-obama-administration-was-gun-running-from-libya-the-benghazi-attack-heroes-told-to-stand-down-and-thinks-four-americans-were-expendable-how-does-obama-view-you/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

19 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. We will win and get this nightmare out of
    our White House!!!

  2. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  3. Excellent blog!!! I reposted it on mine just now. Hope you don’t mind.

  4. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  5. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  6. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  7. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  8. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  9. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  10. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  11. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  12. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  13. [...] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… [...]

  14. […] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… […]

  15. 1. Obama supports Muslim Brotherhood and their construction of a caliphate.
    2. Obama militarily supports the overthrow of Gaddafi.
    3. Chemical Weapons are found in Libya.
    4. Obama Supports the Muslim Brotherhood uprising in Syria, but cannot intervene militarily due t lack of international (Russia) support.
    5. Obama warns Syria not to use chemical weapons.
    6. Benghazi attack occurs during suspected “gun running” operation takes place.
    7. Obama warns Syria again.
    8. Reports of chemical weapons being used.
    9. Syria strongly denies that they employed chemical weapons.
    10. Cover is blown off of Benghazi.
    11. Obama suddenly quiet about Syria.

    So was the attack for AK-47′s?
    Was the cover up to hide running RPG’s?
    Or did our government run and support the use of chemical weapons to green light US Military involvement?

  16. […] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… […]

  17. […] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… […]

  18. […] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… […]

  19. […] America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the… […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 374 other followers

%d bloggers like this: