Obama Gives Coal Miners the Shaft

=================

=========================

From Accuracy In Media:

by Cliff Kincaid

April 5, 2012

The notion that President Obama is trying to fire up his “base,” as he prepares for a re-election campaign, raises the question of what constitutes his base. It is becoming increasingly clear that the “workers” he is supposedly concerned about are going to be dismissed or ignored so that wealthy environmental groups can be accommodated.

Consider the words of Cecil Roberts, president of the powerful United Mine Workers, an affiliate of the AFL-CIO, after EPA administrator Lisa P. Jackson made a ruling against coal plants. “The Navy SEALs shot Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and Lisa Jackson shot us in Washington,” Roberts said. Those who missed the news about Jackson shutting down coal plants through executive branch rules and regulations may have been unprepared for the Roberts assault. It was a big story for the media but framed in a way that played down the significance of what is taking place.

For New Generation of Power Plants, a New Emission Rule From the E.P.A.” was the misleading headline over the story in The New York Times. Much more is at stake than just a “new emission rule” that is somehow supposed to affect global warming.

West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin, a member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, put it another way, saying the EPA “is fully engaging in a war on coal…” Manchin went on, “this ill-advised proposal to prevent new coal-fueled generation will move this country away from using all our domestic resources, and I will fight it every step of the way.”

EPA administrator Lisa Jackson is an environmental zealot who advocates “eco-justice.” In 2010, she received a copy of a “Green Bible” from the liberal National Council of Churches. Her mission is to wage war on the fossil fuel industry in order to build what she calls a “green economy.” She is scheduled to speak at the upcoming Conference on the Scientific, Religious, and Cultural Implications of Global Warming, sponsored by the National Religious Coalition on Creation Care. Jackson received the group’s “Steward of God’s Creation award.”

Before becoming the EPA Administrator, Jackson served as chief of staff to New Jersey Governor Jon S. Corzine, who also served as a New Jersey senator before running the MF Global financial group, now embroiled in scandal and corruption over $1.2 billion in missing money.   Jackson had been appointed by Corzine to be commissioner of the state’s Department of Environmental Protection in 2006.

Jackson’s attack on the coal industry will help China and other U.S. competitors. Although the United States is considered the Saudi Arabia of coal because data show that U.S. currently has the world’s largest coal reserve, America is far behind China in terms of coal production and will fall even further behind because of the new EPA regulations.

On the West Virginia Metro News Talkline radio show, Roberts made his hard-hitting remarks, which have shaken the Obama Administration. In addition to his statement, “The Navy SEALs shot Osama bin Laden in Pakistan and Lisa Jackson shot us in Washington,” he said:

  • “Coal is the fastest growing energy source in the world and they’ve decided, at the EPA, well, we’re going to control what goes into the atmosphere worldwide by halting the construction of coal fired facilities in the United States.”
  • “It doesn’t work, for one thing, and, the second thing, it is just devastating for our economy.”
  • “You have to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions throughout the world.  You can’t just regulate them through the EPA of the United States.”

The Soros-funded blog, Think Progress, called Roberts’ statements “preposterous,” a fascinating reaction that suggests that Obama is prepared to throw the mine workers down the shaft.  The purpose of Think Progress, an unofficial arm of the White House, is to punish anyone—even Democrats—who speak ill of the President or his policies.

Our media failed, perhaps deliberately so, to explain the real significance of what the EPA was doing. The Washington Post headline about the EPA moving against coal was, “EPA imposes first greenhouse gas limits on new power plants.” This story by Juliet Eilperin actually quoted some “advocacy groups” as saying that the EPA proposal was “too weak.”

As noted by the Post, the EPA claimed the new EPA rules and regulations would only affect new power plants. “The media were careful to repeat this claim too,” noted a Wall Street Journal editorial. In fact, however, the paper says, “It isn’t true…the rules will put old plants at risk because of another EPA program known as New Source Review.”

It explains, “Whenever a plant upgrades—whether installing a new fan blade or replacing the proverbial toilet seat—it must comply with every rule on the books. So as a utility obeys the mercury rule, say, it will also be caught in the pincer movement of these new carbon performance standards. The green lobby knows this will slowly kill even current coal plants over time.”

Keep reading……….

=========================

============================

Obama: My Plan Makes Electricity Rates Skyrocket

***Obama’s Cap and Trade Legislation didn’t pass; therefore he is using the EPA to regulate and eventually put coal miners/coal fired plants out of work/business***

Obama has USURPED our Congress by issuing Executive Orders/Regulations

HOW MANY coal miners and coal plant workers will lose their jobs?

Is Obama a true Presidential Leader for America?

YOU DECIDE.

========================

=============================

Is Obama Essentially the “Union’s President”? Or is Obama promoting Forced Unionism on American Businesses? Whatever Happened to Freedom to Choose?

======================

=============

Obama professes the Corporations create Class warfare.

Yet, unbeknownst to the “Middle Class” families, Obama pushes for Unionization of workers.  Is Obama more for the power that Unions represent or FOR the workers across America?

Forced Union dues upon workers is NOT the way to gain popularity amongst workers across America.

The Unions are Socialists/Communists; those that don’t profess this outwardly are Socialists/Communists by proxy (in union that want that form of government).

********************

A backgrounder of the National Labor Relations Board:

The National Labor Relations Board (nlrb) is a five-person federal agency charged with regulating the process of collective bargaining between American employers and their workers. The nlrb serves, in effect, as a court of appeals, investigating and resolving charges of unfair labor practices and disputes over the delineation of bargaining units and elections for union representation. Members of the board are appointed to five-year terms by the president, with the approval of the Senate.

A forerunner of the nlrb, the National Labor Board, was established in 1933 to enforce the collective bargaining provisions of the National Industrial Recovery Act (nira), but it had little power and was in any case invalidated when the Supreme Court struck down the nira in the spring of 1935. Senator Robert Wagner of New York had been pressing for some time for a more comprehensive labor law (including a strong three-person National Labor Relations Board), but had received little support from President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Then, in the summer of 1935, during a period of dramatic reform initiatives that came to be called the Second Hundred Days, Roosevelt suddenly announced his support for the Wagner-Connery Labor Relations Act. Despite conservative opposition, the bill passed both houses easily and was signed on July 5, 1935.

The nlrb, established under the Wagner Act, took an active role in supporting and extending labor’s right to organize during the late 1930s. In earlier years, the Supreme Court had struck down a succession of New Deal laws; its upholding of the Wagner Act in NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) marked the beginning of a series of decisions favorable to New Deal reforms.

More here…….

===============================

The NLRB’s stacked deck

December 31, 2011

President Barack Obama appointed Lafe Solomon acting general counsel in June 2010 during a congressional recess. The timing was no accident. Mr. Solomon’s blatantly pro-union — and anti-business — record precluded any possibility of Senate confirmation, though his nomination is still pending.

Mr. Solomon lived down to that reputation by filing a highly dubious legal complaint against Boeing in April, charging that the company’s 2009 decision to put a 787 Dreamliner plant in North Charleston violated federal law.

His far-fetched case: By saying that the availability of a non-union work force here was a significant factor in the site choice, Boeing officials illegally “retaliated” against a union in Washington state — a union that got roughly 2,000 more jobs from the company in that state after the decision was made.

Fortunately, the NLRB withdrew that complaint three weeks ago, a week after Boeing reached an agreement with the union for it to provide workers to a 737 MAX facility near Seattle.

Unfortunately, though, after dropping the action against Boeing, Mr. Solomon said that “if we were ever faced with a similar pattern, we might well issue a complaint.”

South Carolina Sens. Jim DeMint and Lindsey Graham, along with nine Republican colleagues, rightly responded to that remark by writing a Dec. 19 letter to President Obama, asking him to withdraw his nomination of Mr. Solomon.

The senators wrote: “American employers should have the freedom to make private business decisions without the threat of a government-appointed official filing disparaging and costly litigation. Especially during this economic climate, this sort of bullying by a federal official whom you have handpicked cannot be tolerated.”

And: “Instead of serving as an unbiased adjudicating body that protects the rights of employees and employers, the NLRB has demonstrated an unprecedented and unacceptable overreach of authority. Mr. Solomon’s recent threat is further pressuring every employer to think twice about relocating within the U.S., while facing no retribution for moving outside the country.”

In another Dec. 19 letter, all 47 Republican senators urged the president not to again circumvent their chamber’s “advise and consent” role by taking the recess-appointment route for his two recently announced NLRB appointees, Sharon Block and Richard Griffin.

Certainly Senate questioning of those two nominees would be instructive: Ms. Block is a former aide to the late Sen. Edward Kennedy, a staunch union supporter. Mr. Griffin is general counsel for the International Union of Operating Engineers.

And under this president, the NLRB’s zeal in promoting organized labor at the expense of the business community hasn’t been limited to its misguided complaint against Boeing.

Last week, the agency announced that new unionization election regulations will go into effect on April 30.

More here……..

=========================

Obama has been circumventing Congress and their legislative authority.

============================

Obama SEIU’s Agenda is My Agenda

********************

Obama Leads SEIU Chant After Vowing to Paint the Nation Purple

***********************

Richard Trumka ~ “Forget About the Law” ~ Union Bosses ~ White House Advisors

**************************

Are most Unions in America run Cosa Nostra (mafia style)?

Cosa Nostra Chart

*******************

United Mine Workers President, 25 Years Ago

**Always be a need for Coal and mine workers?**

***************************

Go against the Union Boss and ?

=========================

====================

==============

How can Obama say he is for the working middle class man/woman, yet backs the tactics… of the (Cosa Nostra style) Unions that force workers to join Unions in ambush elections?

======================

Whatever happened to the Freedom to Choose

 in America?

==========================

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 339 other followers