CBO: IMMIGRATION BILL WOULD DRIVE DOWN AMERICAN WORKERS’ WAGES. Cloward-Piven Strategy Looms on the Horizon.

==================

=============================

From Breitbart News:

CBO: IMMIGRATION BILL WOULD DRIVE DOWN AMERICAN WORKERS’ WAGES

June 18, 2013

By Matthew Boyle

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) report on the Senate’s immigration bill predicts that the legislation would drive down the wages of American workers and make it difficult for Americans to find jobs in an already-damaged economy.

On page seven of the analysis, the CBO and JCT conclude that the “Gang of Eight” bill would drive down American workers’ wages. “Taking into account all of those flows of new immigrants, CBO and JCT expect that a greater number of immigrants with lower skills than with higher skills would be added to the workforce, slightly pushing down the average wage for the labor force as a whole, other things being equal,” the report reads.

On the same page, the CBO and JCT analysis found that illegal immigrants who would receive amnesty, or legalized status, would see a spike in their income while Americans’ incomes dropped. “However, CBO and JCT expect that currently unauthorized workers who would obtain legal status under S. 744 would see an increase in their average wages,” it reads.

Similarly, a bullet point on page nine shows that CBO and JCT believe that demand for workers would “dampen,” meaning it would be harder for Americans to find jobs if the bill passed. “Although the average wage would be lower than under current law over the first dozen years, the minimum wage would keep the wages of some less skilled workers from falling, dampening businesses’ demand for those workers,” the analysis states.

These revelations in the report contradict a statement Gang of Eight member Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) made celebrating the analysis’s top-line numbers. “The CBO has further confirmed what most conservative economists have found: reforming our immigration system is a net benefit for our economy, American workers and taxpayers,” Rubio said in that statement.

In contrast, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, has argued the bill would depress American wages, as have several members of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

“In light of recent debates on comprehensive immigration reform, we are writing to address a rarely-discussed effect of granting legal status or effective amnesty to illegal immigrants,” three Civil Rights Commission members wrote to members of Congress in April, arguing that the Gang of Eight bill would negatively impact America’s black communities. “Such grant of legal status will likely disproportionately harm lower-skilled African-Americans by making it more difficult for them to obtain employment and depressing their wages when they do obtain employment.” 

Keep reading here………

*Emphasis added**

=================================

=========================================

Questions to think about:

1.  WHY haven’t the unions been screaming about this?  Hoping to unionize low level workers?  What about current union members that  are having difficulty getting/keeping jobs while those made legal will take any available jobs?

2.  WHY won’t Legislators/Senators refuse to pass bill and just work to ENFORCE immigration laws already on the books?

3.  WHY has the immigration bill ballooned so largesse? WHAT is actually IN THIS BILL?

4.  WHY is the immigration bill ONLY focused on Mexicans?  It is known that there are “other than Mexicans” already here illegally. Snuck across Mexico’s lax border (Chinese, Vietnamese, Hezbollah, etc.) and those that have simply just overstayed their Visa’s.  Besides the OTM’s there are drug cartels, gangs such as MS13 that have infiltrated our country.  What will become of them; will they become legal US citizens?

5.  With our economy already strapped with a 7.6% unemployment rate (probably higher since some have just given up looking for work) and those that are working are being cut hours due to the regulations in Obamacare, HOW will our economy be able to handle those that will be granted amnesty style entitlements?

We the People are watching the Cloward-Piven Strategy unfold before our very eyes.

Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1971 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.

The authors noted that the number of Americans subsisting on welfare — about 8 million, at the time — probably represented less than half the number who were technically eligible for full benefits. They proposed a “massive drive to recruit the pooronto the welfare rolls.”  Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash “powerful forces for major economic reform at the national level.”

Their article called for “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy.” Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help. Carefully orchestrated media campaigns, carried out by friendly, leftwing journalists, would float the idea of “a federal program of income redistribution,” in the form of a guaranteed living income for all — working and non-working people alike. Local officials would clutch at this idea like drowning men to a lifeline. They would apply pressure on Washington to implement it. With every major city erupting into chaos, Washington would have to act. This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements — mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down. Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown — providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change. That was the theory.

When, not if, our economy collapses and the government is rendered BROKE…..HOW will those currently on US government entitlement programs (free phones, EBT, SNAP, etc.) provide for themselves and their families?

Prepare yourselves America.

=============================

============================

=============================================

Judge Jeanine Pirro Slams The REAL LOSERS in Washington — The Obama Administration. It IS about a Matter of TRUST..

==================

============================

Link to video

See commentary at: 
http://www.westernfreepress.com/?p=13..
.

Starting with the metaphor of a trustworthy chicken sandwich, the judge talks about the importance of trust in those upon whom we count. Even the president talks up the importance of trust. But those whom the judge calls The Real Losers of DC have lost our trust.

====================

==================================

RELATED LINKS:

The Twelve Minute Video Spoken with Eloquence and Righteous Indignation about the Obama Administration’s LIES about Benghazi TERRORIST ATTACK 9/11/12

******************

Judge Jeanine Pirro Calls for Indictment of Eric Holder on Multiple Counts

**********************

“No One In This Administration Knows ANYTHING!” Is Joseph Goebbels being Revisited?

===========================================

====================================================

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels quotes   <<<Propagandist for Adolph Hitler

****************************

******************************

David Axelrod. The Strategist behind Obama. Axelrod Connections to Communist Party and the Cantor Family

==================

=============================

From Trevor Loudon:

Weekly Featured Profile: David Axelrod

June 9, 2013

David_axelrod-150x150

David Axelrod is a long-time friend of President Barack Obama. He successfully managed Obama’s 2008 and 2012 Election campaigns and currently serves as a Senior Advisor to the President.

Like the President himself, Axelrod came out of the orbit of the Communist Party USA.

Axelrod was born in New York in 1955 to leftist parents Joseph Axelrod and Myril Bennett Axelrod.

In the 1940s, Myril Axelrod wrote for a left leaning New York magazine, PM. Though not officially a communist publication, several Marxists (including Labor Editor Leo Huberman) and Communist Party USA members worked on the paper.

Former Communist Eugene Lyons, writing in The Red Decade:

The Stalinist Penetration of America, noted that PM’s staff included a former editor of the Daily Worker, former editor of The Communist, a leader of the Young Communist League USA, a Soviet government official and a former staff cartoonist for the Daily Worker, the official newspaper of the Communist Party USA.

PM’s Washington, D.C. correspondent I.F. Stone was later identified as a Communist Party USA member and a Soviet intelligence agent.

One of PM’s writers, Earl Conrad, also wrote for the leftist magazine Negro Story, as did Frank Marshall Davis the Communist Party USA member who was later to mentor the young Barack Obama in Hawaii.

David Axelrod’s own mentors were two well known Chicago journalists/political activists named Don Rose and David Canter.

In his early years as a political consultant, Axelrod, following in the footsteps of his mentor, the political strategist Don Rose, carved out a reputation for himself as a skillful specialist working for local progressive candidates…says Rose. “I think he’s a principled, generally progressive guy…”

Axelrod first met Rose in the early 1970s while studying political science at the University of Chicago and working as a reporter on the Hyde Park Herald.

Around that time, Rose edited and co-owned a small newspaper called the Hyde Park-Kenwood Voices. The paper tended to follow the Communist Party USA line – campaigning for example to abolish the House Committee on Un-American Activities. The Voice’s co-owner, the late David Canter, had personal experience with the committee, being hauled before it and named as a Communist Party USA member in the late 1960s.

Canter and Don Rose took the young David Axelrod under their wing. They took it upon themselves to “mentor” and “educate…politically,” the young journalist. Don Rose later wrote a reference letter for Axelrod that helped win him the internship at the Chicago Tribune which launched his career.

Don Rose writing to David Canter‘s son Marc Canter said:

“David Axelrod did not work for the Voices at any point. He was a reporter for the HP Herald while attending U of C, appearing on the scene first in 1975, just after the Voices folded–but he was familiar with our paper as a student before he got the Herald job. Your dad and i “mentored” and helped educate him politically in that capacity, which is perhaps why you may recall seeing him hanging around the house. I later wrote a reference letter for him that helped him win an internship at the Tribune, which was the next step in his journalism career.”

Around 1970, Don Rose was a leader of the a well known Communist Party USA front, the Chicago Committee to Defend the Bill of Rights.

The Chicago Committee to Defend the Bill of Rights Executive Director was Communist Party USA member Richard Criley. Other party members in leading positions included Abe FeinglassErnest DeMaioJack SpiegelJesse Prosten and Norman Roth.

Other radicals active in the organization included former Communist Party USA member Milt Cohen (later a founder of Chicago Democratic Socialists of America), Quentin YoungTimuel Black and Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf. The latter three all went on to join Democratic Socialists of America and to form close personal friendships with Barack Obama.

David Canter was the son of Harry Canter, a secretary of the Boston Communist Party USA. In the mid-1930s, Harry Canter moved his family, including his son David to the Soviet Union, where he worked translating Lenin’s works into English.

By the 1940s, they were living in Chicago, both active members of the Communist Party.

By 1960, David Canter had teamed up with well known Chicago Communist Party member, LeRoy Wolins.

The pair owned a company called Translation World Publishers, which specialized in publications from and about the Soviet Union. The company soon attracted the attention of the House Un-American Activities Committee, which suspected Canter and Wolins of being conduits for Soviet propaganda. In a report prepared by the House Committee on Un-American Activities in May and July 1962, entitled “Communist Outlets for the Distribution of Soviet propaganda in the United States,” David Canter was heavily quizzed about payments his company received from the Soviet Union.

After the U.S. Government demanded that Translation World Publishers register as the agent of a foreign power, Canter de-registerd the company.

The Committee went on to find that:

Translation World Publishers was an outlet for the distribution of Soviet propaganda…this publishing house was subsidized by Soviet funds and was created by known Communists to serve the propaganda interests of the U.S.S.R.

So David Axelrod learned his trade at the hands of a Communist front activist and a bona fide Communist Party member who was paid by the Soviets to distribute communist propaganda in the United States.

Read more here.

==========================

=====================================

RELATED LINK:

Obama’s First Enabler: Alice Palmer. Alice Palmer was effectively, a Soviet “Agent of Influence”. Alice Palmer Learned the Obama “Way” of Politics too Late.

==============================================

A post luncheon “Buddies” picture:

Jehmu Greene Axelrod and Sandra Fluke

Does anyone look familiar to YOU?

===================

===============================

ADDITIONAL LINK:

Declassified – Joseph Stalin. Watch and THINK America…. Obama Scandals: Benghazi, IRA, EPA, Government Monitoring of YOUR phones, emails, etc.

***************************

Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett: Brought Together by Fickle Fate, or Something More?

************************

Valerie Jarrett Every Bit as Popular with Obama Insiders as You Would Expect

 

Excerpt:

Valerie Jarrett: Alter writes that Jarrett, a big sister figure to the Obamas, is “so close to the family [met Barack and Michelle in 1991 before they were married when she interviewed Michelle for a job in City Hall] that she went on vacation with them.”  Others, envious of her access, called her the “Keeper of the Essence.”  Alter describes her as “the defender, protector, and avenger for the first family.”  She was also called the “Night Stalker” because she “could and often did wander up to the family quarters after hours.”  She regularly accompanied Obama on travels abroad and, although foreign policy was not a particular interest or responsibility of hers, “she would frequently take one of the half-dozen seats alongside the president in bilateral meetings, which meant one less seat for a policy expert.” [Emphasis added]

 

Val Jarrett's quote payback time

****************************

**************

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels quotes

******************

****************************

In honor of our fallen; our Veterans that fought on foreign lands to protect Liberty….Freedom…for ALL Americans. Honoring our current Military. Did/Do WE as a country FIGHT for Liberty and the Freedom to Choose? Or will we Surrender to Tyranny?

=====================

================================

OPINION:

In honor of our fallen; our Veterans that fought on foreign lands to protect Liberty….Freedom…for ALL Americans

May 27, 2013

The way we conduct ourselves and what exists in our daily lives today has taken a turn.  A turn for the worse.

In the olden days, not 50 years ago, we lived a simple life.  No cell phones, no video games, no Dialectic Process from our government.

Joseph McCarthy, a Senator from Wisconsin, worked feverishly to expose and vocalize about Communist subversion within our own government.  Today, in 2013, can we as Americans look back and at least pause to think he may have been right?  The word “McCarthyism” was utilized by several people that we against his exposure of  Communist subversion.

“McCarthyism is Americanism with its sleeves rolled,” McCarthy said in a 1952 speech, and later that year he published a book titled McCarthyism: The Fight For America. Link

The Communist Party USA had its origins in 1919.  Out of the Mouth of the Communist Party USA’s Leader: Socialism Leads to Communism

Our veterans of World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, The Iraq/Afghanistan wars who fought/are fighting to PROTECT America from Communism and to free people under duress and fear from dictatorial leaders like Stalin, Hitler, Saddam Hussein as well as fighting against the war on TERROR from Al-Qaeda (Bin Laden), et. al deserve our utmost respect.

ROLLING THUNDER ROARS INTO WASHINGTON FOR MEMORIAL DAY

Against the backdrop of Arlington National Cemetary, Rolling Thunder roared across Memorial Bridge in an annual commemoration of those lost and missing in the nation’s wars

Link to video

==============================

Link to video

==============

Remembering Memorial Day

Link to video

==========================

The current Secretary of State, John Kerry gave testimony to Congress that Vietnam soldiers were “murderers”.

John Kerry and Jane Fonda

Link to video

John Kerry friends with Jane Fonda:

Jane Fonda: ‘I Have Never Done Anything to Hurt My Country’…….You Have GOT to be KIDDING…..

Keep in mind Jane Fonda’s statement above about “lies” and that she “wouldn’t do anything to hurt her country”

Source: 
http://www.1stcavmedic.com/jane_fonda.htm

Several requests from students and other visitors have asked if the photos depicting Jane Fonda sitting on an NVA anti-aircraft gun were really her or not.  The answer to this question is YES.  Jane Fonda has expressed her regrets for having her picture taken while sitting on the anti-aircraft gun and for the pain that her action has caused many American Veterans.

======

Jane Fonda sitting on a seat of an anti-aircraft gun Jane Fonda looking admiringly at an NVA gun crew

Jane Fonda applauding an NVA anti-aircraft gun crew.  These guns were used to shoot down American planes and contributed to the deaths of American Airmen.

Notice the anti-aircraft shells
that are ready to be used to
shoot down American planes
by Jane Fonda’s foot
Close up of Jane Fonda wearing a steel pot from the Communist NVA. gun crew
Color photo of Jane Fonda sitting in the gun seat
Jane Fonda smiling with NVA gun crew
Jane Fonda laughing with
an NVA gun crew

===================

Another student had requested the transcript of Jane Fonda’s radio address which she had broadcast in North Vietnam.  This transcription, dated August 22, 1972 was made from her Hotel Especen broadcast in Hanoi at 7:11 p.m.  

The following  was submitted in the U.S. Congress House Committee on Internal Security, Travel to Hostile Areas. [HR16742, 19-25 September 1972, page 761]


[Broadcast]

This is Jane Fonda. During my two week visit in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, I’ve had the opportunity to visit a great many places and speak to a large number of people from all walks of life- workers, peasants, students, artists and dancers, historians, journalists, film actresses, soldiers, militia girls, members of the women’s union, writers.

I visited the (Dam Xuac) agricultural coop, where the silk worms are also raised and thread is made. I visited a textile factory, a kindergarten in Hanoi. The beautiful Temple of Literature was where I saw traditional dances and heard songs of resistance. I also saw unforgettable ballet about the guerrillas training bees in the south to attack enemy soldiers. The bees were danced by women, and they did their job well.

In the shadow of the Temple of Literature I saw Vietnamese actors and actresses perform the second act of Arthur Miller’s play All My Sons, and this was very moving to me- the fact that artists here are translating and performing American plays while US imperialists are bombing their country.

I cherish the memory of the blushing militia girls on the roof of their factory, encouraging one of their sisters as she sang a song praising the blue sky of Vietnam- these women, who are so gentle and poetic, whose voices are so beautiful, but who, when American planes are bombing their city, become such good fighters.

I cherish the way a farmer evacuated from Hanoi, without hesitation, offered me, an American, their best individual bomb shelter while US bombs fell near by. The daughter and I, in fact, shared the shelter wrapped in each others arms, cheek against cheek. It was on the road back from Nam Dinh, where I had witnessed the systematic destruction of civilian targets- schools, hospitals, pagodas, the factories, houses, and the dike system.

As I left the United States two weeks ago, Nixon was again telling the American people that he was winding down the war, but in the rubble- strewn streets of Nam Dinh, his words echoed with sinister (words indistinct) of a true killer. And like the young Vietnamese woman I held in my arms clinging to me tightly- and I pressed my cheek against hers- I thought, this is a war against Vietnam perhaps, but the tragedy is America’s.

One thing that I have learned beyond a shadow of a doubt since I’ve been in this country is that Nixon will never be able to break the spirit of these people; he’ll never be able to turn Vietnam, north and south, into a neo- colony of the United States by bombing, by invading, by attacking in any way. One has only to go into the countryside and listen to the peasants describe the lives they led before the revolution to understand why every bomb that is dropped only strengthens their determination to resist. I’ve spoken to many peasants who talked about the days when their parents had to sell themselves to landlords as virtually slaves, when there were very few schools and much illiteracy, inadequate medical care, when they were not masters of their own lives.

But now, despite the bombs, despite the crimes being created- being committed against them by Richard Nixon, these people own their own land, build their own schools- the children learning, literacy- illiteracy is being wiped out, there is no more prostitution as there was during the time when this was a French colony. In other words, the people have taken power into their own hands, and they are controlling their own lives.

And after 4,000 years of struggling against nature and foreign invaders- and the last 25 years, prior to the revolution, of struggling against French colonialism- I don’t think that the people of Vietnam are about to compromise in any way, shape or form about the freedom and independence of their country, and I think Richard Nixon would do well to read Vietnamese history, particularly their poetry, and particularly the poetry written by Ho Chi Minh.

[recording ends]

=============================

We, as Americans have let down our guard.  We have become complacent. We have been subverted into believing our Government knows what is best for us; not what we can do for ourselves.

The Congressional Progressive Caucus is made of Socialists (started by Sen. Bernie Sanders, an open Socialist) who believes that Progressives know what is good for us; Nudging us like cattle into a contained “herd”.  Is America Being “Nudged” Toward LENINISM?

A Progressive well know to America is Dennis Kucinich.

Democratic Socialism a la Dennis Kucinich? A Must Watch Video

Link to video

Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House in 2009, spoke to illegal immigrants and proclaimed them as “special people” calls them “patriotic”

Deporting illegals is “Un-American?” Not one mention of the fact they are breaking the law.

Link to video

******************************

We are now being governed by a President that outwardly lies to us:

Link to video

Link to video

Link to video

Reagan Warned Us About Obama

Link to video

****************************

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels quotes

***Goebbels was the propagandist for Adolph Hitler***

******************************

A government that controls the media; what is allowed to become public knowledge.

The Obama campaign controlled the media in 2008:

Remember this from Obama’s 2008?

We Control the News Media – Anita Dunn Barack Obama’s Communications Whitehouse Director

Link to video

********************

NBC’s Brian Williams

williams-bows-to-obama-1

**Note Obama’s posture**

***********************

Why Don’t We Hear About Soros’ Ties to Over 30 Major News Organizations?

Is White House Controlling/Influencing Media in Sandra Fluke Case?

They continue to control the message today: How?

Conservatives Knew there was Liberal Media Bias; but This is Incredible

******************************

Legislation passed by the Democrats can be tied to the Democracy Alliance, The Institute for Policy Studies and the Center for American Progress

President Obama Signs Executive Order Allowing for Control Over All US Resources. Is the Center for American Progress the Shadow Party that Controls Obama?

***********************

And NOW in 2013…….THIS

Are the Onion Peels Near the Center? Has This Administration’s Cosa Nostra Government Been Outed? Scandals Rocking this Administration….

*************************

IRS Scandal: The Union Connection. Has Obama “Politicized” the IRS? Whitehouse Scandals = Intimigate…..

**************************

Your homework America:

Books written by a New Zealand Patriot trying to help save America!

If you haven’t read this book, order it now on Amazon and read it.

165_Cover_BOATEW_Oct_6_bgEditor_1319646790437

Then pre-order Trevor Loudon’s new book due out in August 2013

Testimonial: The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress

Trevor's new book 1

Exposing the DSA Marxists in Congress!

======================

Bill Ayers, an admitted friend to Barack Obama

BillAyersFlag1

Michelle and Barack Obama:

Obama's bad pledge--left hands right chest

What is wrong with the picture above?

==================================

Teaparty Patriots labeled as terrorists or militants by the Department of Homeland Security

owsvsteapartychart

Teaparty Washington,D.C. 9-12-09

Teaparty Washington,D.C. 9-12-09

The Grey-Haired Brigade: Still Here and Invoking Liberty and Freedom

Excerpt:

We are probably considered old fashioned and out-dated by many. But there are a few things you need to remember before completely writing us off. We won World War II, fought in Korea and Viet Nam. We can quote The Pledge of Allegiance, and know where to place our hand while doing so. We wore the uniform of our country with pride and lost many friends on the battlefield. We didn’t fight for the Socialist States of America; we fought for the “Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.” We wore different uniforms but carried the same flag.

We know the words to the Star Spangled Banner, America, and America the Beautiful by heart, and you may even see some tears running down our cheeks as we sing. We have lived what many of you have only read in history books and we feel no obligation to apologize to anyone for America.

Yes, we are old and slow these days but rest assured, we have at least one good fight left in us. We have loved this country, fought for it, and died for it, and now we are going to save it. It is our country and nobody is going to take it away from us. We took oaths to defend America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that is an oath we plan to keep. There are those who want to destroy this land we love but, like our founders, there is no way we are going to remain silent.

It was mostly the young people of this nation who elected Obama and the Democratic Congress. You fell for the “Hope and Change” which in reality was nothing but “Hype and Lies.”

You have tasted socialism and seen evil face to face, and have found you don’t like it after all. You make a lot of noise, but most are all too interested in their careers or “Climbing the Social Ladder” to be involved in such mundane things as patriotism and voting. Many of those who fell for the “Great Lie” in 2008 are now having buyer’s remorse. With all the education we gave you, you didn’t have sense enough to see through the lies and instead drank the ‘Kool-Aid.’

Now you’re paying the price and complaining about it. No jobs, lost mortgages, higher taxes, and less freedom.

This is what you voted for and this is what you got. We entrusted you with the Torch of Liberty and you traded it for a paycheck and a fancy house.

gray haired brigade

soldier_hug

Will a simple step such as this turn this country around?

May 8, 2013

***  Chairman sits during Pledge of Allegiance **

Link to video

========================

Posted without comment:

allenwestpledge

westobama

Allen West American Eagle

====================================

May God Bless America, our military, her Veterans, and our Military Families

Eagle praying for America

Eagle standing watch in military cemetery

=======================================================

===============================

Obama LIES to Seniors to Garner Vote. NOW See what Obama Has Planned for Senior Citizens! “Moderate” Cuts to Social Security and Medicare…

======================

==================================

From the Washington Examiner:

Obama budget to cut billions from Social Security and Medicare while raising trillions in new taxes

April 5, 2013

By Conn Carroll

President Obama has apparently tired of hearing Republicans pointing out that he’s yet to put his debt reduction plan on paper. According to multiple reports, Obama’s fiscal year 2014 budget, set to be released next week, will largely match the final “grand bargain” offer Obama made to Speaker John Boehner in December 2012. That offer, and next week’s budget, reportedly will include billions in cuts to Social Security and Medicare and trillions in new tax hikes.

Obama’s Social Security cuts will be achieved by changing how the federal government calculates inflation, known as “chained C.P.I.” His Medicare cuts will come through either reduced payments to doctors and hospitals, or higher premiums for wealthier Medicare recipients. Obama hopes both of these changes will lure Republican moderates like Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and John McCain, R-Ari., into supporting trillions of dollars in new tax hikes.

Obama’s budget will also call for hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending on infrastructure projects and early childhood education programs. The new pre-K programs will be funded by new taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products.

Obama’s decision to embrace Social Security and Medicare cuts is yet another acknowledgement that his earlier strategy of hoping sequester spending cuts would force Republicans to accept tax hikes, has completely failed. A new Marist poll out this month shows that Americans have largely accepted the sequester cuts.

Unfortunately for Obama, his new entitlement-cut strategy will also fail. None of the cuts Obama has previously outlined significantly reform any of the federal government’s entitlement programs in any way. Almost all Republicans view them as just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Obama got his tax hikes in January.

More……

==============================

RELATED:

Obama proposing Social Security change in exchange for taxes, drawing liberal ire

==================================

AND for those Seniors that think AARP is on your side with health programs/issues:

To Seniors Worried About Healthcare: Wonder WHY AARP Supports The Obama Healthcare Bill? It’s Connections HERE

*********************

Is AARP Innocent? Have They Found Loopholes? Or Are They “Buds” with the White House?

Barry Rand, the chief executive of AARP, was a big donor to the Obama campaign and has retained a cozy relationship with the administration.

**********************

“No Lobbyists IN My White House”……Parade of Lobbyists In and Out of Whitehouse over Healthcare! Lies? Deception?

=============================

==========================================

ADDITIONAL LINK:

HOW FAR DOES SEIU‘S ’FORCED UNIONIZATION’ GO? Wait Until YOU Hear These Stories Involving SKIMMING MONEY From MEDICAID CHECKS. Also Highlights of Obamacare that all Americans Should Know About!

============================

********************

======================================

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels quotes

**Joseph Goebbels was the Propaganda specialist for Adolph Hitler***

=========================================

====================================================

Progressives Pride Themselves on Dividing America: New Website? WageClassWar.org

=================

============================

February 21, 2013

From Discover the Networks:

WAGECLASSWAR.ORG (WCW)

  • A project of the Campaign for America’s Future

  • Advises Democratic political candidates to engage in “class war” in order “to win the who’s-side-are-you-on battle” in the eyes of the voting public

WageClassWar.org (WCW) was launched on November 15, 2012 as a project of the Campaign for America’s Future (CAF). As articulated by CAF co-founder Robert Borosage, WCW’s mission is to protect the interests of middle class people who are “besieged” by “America’s extreme inequality and rigged [economic] system” and are “looking for champions” to stand up for them. Toward this end, WCW supports progressive Democratic political candidates and openly advises them to engage in “class war” in order “to win the who’s-side-are-you-on battle” in the eyes of the voting public. The surest way to achieve this goal, says WCW, is to constantly emphasize “the reality that the wealthy and special corporate interests [are] rigging the rules to benefit themselves, while the middle class [is] getting crushed.” According to WCW, the Occupy Wall Street movement—through its ceaseless repetition of slogans about “the 99%,” “the 1%,” “inequality,” and the evils of “Wall Street”—“brought this reality to national attention and demonstrated widespread American sympathy for its analysis.”

To prove the efficacy of its proposed “class war” strategy, WCW in November 2012 identified several Democratic politicians who had expertly used it to their own great advantage in that year’s elections. For instance, WCW claimed that President Barack Obama, who had a sub-40% approval rating in mid-2011, was able to win re-election just 16 months later because of his “decision to engage in class warfare, to directly engage the class war being waged by the 1 percent against the rest of the country.” In certain key battleground states like Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, said WCW, Obama “took on the class warrior role” with particular aggressiveness by:

  • “constantly reinforc[ing] the contrasts” between himself and Republican challenger Mitt Romney “regarding the middle class”;
  • “indict[ing] the ‘you’re on your own’ economics of Republicans”;
  • emphasizing his desire to “eliminat[e] the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy”; and
  • “painting a believable picture of … Romney as the plutocrat who … can’t empathize with your struggles.”

Further, noted WCW, Obama had gained “a clear advantage” as a result of Occupy Wall Street‘s “reframing of the nation’s most important economic issue.”
WCW also praised Obama for dividing Americans not only along class lines, but also gender and racial/ethnic lines.

For example, explained WCW, Obama “defended contraception and pay equity” for women while offering a palatable alternative to the “harsh anti-immigrant posturing” of Republicans—whom Borosage depicts as a “stale, male, pale, Southern-based party in a nation of diversity”—that “drove Hispanics and Asians into Democratic arms.”

Similarly, WCW attributed Elizabeth Warren‘s U.S. Senate victory in 2012 to a class-warfare campaign wherein she burnished “her populist credentials” by demanding “financial reform” on Wall Street, placing “the people over the powerful,” and claiming that wealthy individuals were morally obligated to pay high taxes for the benefit of the poor because “there is nobody in this country who got rich on his own.” WCW also gave high marks to Warren’s Democratic National Convention speech, in which she complained that “the system is rigged” in favor of oil companies that “guzzle down billions in subsidies,” billionaires who “pay lower tax rates than their secretaries,” and “Wall Street CEOs—the same ones who wrecked our economy and destroyed millions of jobs.”

Other worthy political role models, in WCW’s estimation, included:

  • newly elected Senator Heidi Heitkamp (D-North Dakota), who “campaigned as a class warrior with class” and effectively portrayed her Republican opponent as a “multimillionaire landlord” who “would fight for tax cuts for the wealthy while placing all of the burden of spending cuts on seniors and the economically vulnerable”;
  • Senator Jon Tester of Montana, who won re-election with a campaign that “always put him on the side of ordinary people fighting the powerful,” while casting his Tea Party-allied opponent as “a land developer solidly allied with the powerful, whether in business or government”;
  • Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown, who ran as “a full-throated populist” pledging to “put the reins on Wall Street banks” and “end taxpayer-funded giveaways to huge corporations that ship American jobs overseas”; and
  • Rep. Tammy Baldwin, who hammered her Republican challenger for “his well-paid work as a lobbyist on behalf of greedy corporate interests,” and “stressed that wealthy people like Warren Buffett shouldn’t be paying a lower share of their income in taxes than the people who work for them.”

More…..

============================

RELATED LINK:

Easily Another Progressive Radical Few Americans Know About…..READ, LEARN and EMPOWER…..

Excerpt:

Robert Borosage

Robert Borosage is easily one of America’s most dangerous radicals.

He is a member of the Board of Trustees of the ultra-left Institute for Policy Studies. He is also the President of the Institute for America’s Future and the Secretary-Treasurer of Campaign for America’s Future.

He writes widely on political, economic, and national security issues for publications including the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Nation and The American Prospect magazine.

Borosage is acting chair for the American Progressive Caucus Policy Foundation, which is a major conduit of socialist policies from the Institute for Policy Studies, into the US Congress via the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

On April 10, 1982, an IPS-sponsored group, including Borosage, visiting Moscow for a week of meetings with high-level Soviet officials responsible for disseminating disinformation and propaganda for U.S. consumption. The IPS group identified only two of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Central Committee officials they met - Georgi A. Arbatov, head of the Institute of the USA and Canada, a “think-tank” that provides research and analysis and also cultivates and develops contacts with Americans at the direction of the KGB and the International Department of the CPSU Central Committee; and Vadim V. Zagladin, first deputy chief of the International Department.

==============================

=========================================

Class Warfare is PURE Saul Alinsky: The Haves  vs.  The Have NOTS.

Of Means and Ends [Forget  moral or ethical considerations]

“The end is what you want, the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. … The real arena is corrupt and bloody.” p.24

“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…. The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means… The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be….” pp.25-26

“The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means….” p.29

“The seventh rule… is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics….” p.34

“The tenth rule… is you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.… It involves sifting the multiple factors which combine in creating the circumstances at any given time… Who, and how many will support the action?… If weapons are needed, then are appropriate d weapons available? Availability of means determines whether you will be underground or above ground; whether you will move quickly or slowly…”p.36

Notes: Apparently, Michelle Obama referred to these words during her Democratic National Convention speech:

“She said, ‘Barack stood up that day,’ talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, ‘and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about ‘The world as it is‘ and ‘The world as it should be…’ And, ‘All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an obligation to, fight for the world as it should be.”

Do you wonder who — or whose values — should determine what “the world… should be?”

SOURCE

===================================

====================================================

Are the Progressives utilizing the same argument when it comes to the 2nd Amendment argument today?

Progressives Paternalization over American citizens is obvious:

a. You do not know HOW to live your life.

b. You need to listen to the false reasoning about WHY you shouldn’t have a gun.

c. You need to let us GOVERNMENT tell you what to wear, eat, and think (because we think you are too stupid to think on your own/make your own choices).

The Antithesis of Paternalization is INDIVIDUAL Liberty and Freedom!

The Progressives always harp on reasoning behind abortion as The Woman’s Right to Choose……

Mom with gun a woman's right to choose

===============================

===============================================

Adolf Hitler – Progressive Pioneer. Connections to Margaret Sanger/Hitler and Eugenics.

==================

===========================

From Trevor Loudon:

Adolf Hitler – Progressive Pioneer

February 6, 2013

By: Rob
JoshuaPundit

President Obama’s second inaugural was a speech that the Obama Media literally drooled over as a straight forward and forceful expression of progressivism unmatched in American history. I agree, it was, but there was one thing that bothered me… the tendency of these media personalities to ignore the sources of many of the ideas the president expressed so well.

In the interest of fairness and as a debt to history, I think it’s important that we take a minute to give due credit to one of the greatest progressives in history, someone who undoubtedly should be an inspiration and influence to all progressives – former German leader Adolf Hitler, who against strong odds rose to power and fundamentally changed Germany and for a while, the world.

Like our president, Adolf Hitler came from humble beginnings, the son of an Austrian civil servant in Linz whom died when he was fourteen. Some biographers have said that Alois Heidler provided the young Adolf with his first example of government in action and how it could affect people’s lives. Young Hitler’s early years also undoubtedly gave him a sense of the importance of education and how government could strengthen it. As a young student, Adolf Hitler was frequently at odds with his non-unionized teachers, who seemed content to teach by rote and lacked strong support from government.

When Adolf Hitler gravitated to Vienna as a young man to pursue a career as a painter, not only was he influenced by other progressive thinkers like Houston Stewart Chamberlain and Heinrich Gotthard von Treitschke, but also by an extraordinary activist progressive politician, Karl Lueger, the Burgomaster (Mayor) of Vienna, whom Hitler later called ‘a genius’ and claimed as a model. Lueger, whose Christian Socialist Party was organized along many of the same lines that Hitler would later adopt for his National Socialist Party, could best be described as a early practitioner of Saul Alinky’s political ethics, balancing one special interest group against another for his own political advancement. At one point, when some of his anti-Semitic supporters questioned his taking campaign contributions from wealthy Jewish donors, Luegar famously shut them down by telling them that he was the one whom would decide who was a Jew! Lueger is also credited with municipalizing utilities and instituting public transportation in Vienna, along with a number of other shovel ready public works projects.

During this period, Hitler also experienced first hand what happens when government does not institute an adequate social safety net. After falling into dire poverty in Vienna, Hitler was forced to live in a homeless shelter for some time, and later a men’s hostel for the disadvantaged. He remained a socialist and a champion of the 99% ever after, although rejecting pure Marxism as being unworkable and unsuitable to those who favored strong, nationalist views and German exceptionalism.

In WWI, Hitler served in the German Army, suffered combat wounds and was a decorated veteran.

He later decided to truly make a difference in his adopted homeland by entering the public sector via the National Socialist Democratic German Worker’s Party (NSDAP in German, or Nazi using the typical German diminutive).

Hitler, being a spell binding orator and a charismatic speaker soon took over the party and refined its progressive agenda and message. With the exception of calling for a strong military and a renunciation of the restrictions of the Versailles Treaty, two issues unique to that place and time, Hitler and the Nazi’s message hardly sounds out of place in our political climate of today.

The German Hyperinflation and resulting economic crisis of 1921 occurred just as the Party and Adolf Hitler came of political age.

It destroyed the savings of Germany’s middle class, created massive unemployment and was blamed by most Germans on the financial establishment, poor governmental fiscal management, profiteers, and speculators. Or as today’s progressives call them, ‘banksters’, ‘Wall Street’ and the ‘one per cent’.

In this 3 year period, 1921-1923, Hitler’s political star rose as he became a vociferous champion of the middle class and Germany’s 99%. He and the Nazis called for reining in German financial institutions, job creation, making the fat cats pay their fair share and for increased spending on social welfare programs. The main difference in Hitler’s program as opposed to mainstream socialists and communists was his championing of a resurgent German military and his fierce opposition to the restrictions and the huge reparations demanded by the Versailles Treaty. Hitler’s patriotic message, particularly coming from a decorated war hero resonated with a surprising amount of the German people.

The Nazi Party also won friends and influenced people by community organizing. They ran soup kitchens, promoted youth programs and championed the 99% in issues like landlord tenant relations, particularly in their main base of Munich.

And it was in Munich that Adolf Hitler made his first serious political miscalculation, misjudging his popular support in Bavaria with an attempted ‘putsch’, a takeover. It failed, but Hitler’s personal popularity ensured that he received an extraordinarily light sentence of 8 months in comfortable circumstances, where, like a lot of other revolutionary figures, he used the time to refine his message further and wrote his political testament, Mein Kampf (‘My Struggle’).

After he was released in 1924, Hitler used the rest of the 1920′s to consolidate the Nazis and turn them into a nationwide movement. The SA (known colloquially as Brownshirts) were reorganized into an effective force of street activists, Hitler established his own national daily newspaper, the Völkischer Beobachter, and continued to build his following and spread his message of nationalism mixed with progressive social policies. The Nazi banner is a superb symbol of Hitler’s ideology – the red banner of socialism with the Aryan nationalist symbol of the swastika in the middle.

Hitler was one of the first modern politicians to recognize how important media and messaging were to popularizing progressive policies:

“The art of propaganda consists precisely in being able to awaken the imagination of the public through an appeal to their feelings, in finding the appropriate psychological form that will arrest the attention and appeal to the hearts of the national masses.” [...]

“This sentiment, however, is not complex, but simple and consistent. It is not highly differentiated, but has only the negative and positive notions of love and hatred, right and wrong, truth and falsehood.”

“Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it is favourable to the other side, present it according to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must present only that aspect of the truth which is favourable to its own side. (…) The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward. (…) Every change that is made in the subject of a propagandist message must always emphasize the same conclusion. The leading slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from several angles, but in the end one must always return to the assertion of the same formula.”

What Adolf Hitler wrote about messaging in Mein Kampf predates and almost exactly mirrors what Sol Alinsky wrote many years later in Rules For Radicals, a book that many progressives consider their political bible, but with one exception… Hitler was much more open about referring to what he was doing as propaganda for political purposes.

Adolf Hitler and the Nazi’s moment came with the worldwide Depression of the 1930′s which devastated Germany’s economy. The chancellor at that time, the Catholic Centre Party’s Heinrich Brüning, attempted to stave off some of the worst effects with various austerity measures, similar to those of President Hoover in America. However, the measures were unsuccessful and only added to dissatisfaction with the Weimar government, which many Germans felt had been forced on them by the victorious allies anyway.

The same sentiments ordinary Germans had voiced during the Hyperinflation were repeated… that the misery was due to the government’s policies, the fat cats, the speculators. This was amplified by the failure of several large banks.

Such an environment was almost tailor made for Hitler, his Nazis, and their message, targeting the 99% and assuming the mantle of the champions of the middle class and social justice. In the 1931 elections, the Nazis gained 18.3% of the votes and became the second largest party in the Reichstag.

In the years between 1931 and 1933, the Nazis increased their share of the German electorate, getting to 43.9% of the vote. Germany’s government was ineffectual and unable to act because of partisan politics and the difficulty in consensus between the Nazis, the Communists, the Catholic Centre Party, President Paul Hindenburg’s German National People’s Party (DNVP) and some of the other smaller parties. In those conditions, Hindenburg was convinced to appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933 as part of a coalition of the Nazis, DNVP, and Catholic Centre Party. The idea was to unify and take action for the good of the nation, or as a group of influential German politicians, industrialists and military figures wrote to President Hindenburg, to appoint Hitler as leader of a government “independent from parliamentary parties”, which could turn into a movement that would “enrapture millions of people”.

Hope and change with a gemütlichkeit flavor, nicht wahr?

After the burning of the Reichstag (which, really, can be considered street theater and legitimate protest designed to provoke a public response), Adolf Hitler wasn’t one to let a good crisis go to waste. He promptly brought the Ermächtigungsgesetz (Enabling Act) to a vote in the newly elected Reichstag. It was designed to bypass partisan gridlock in Berlin, gave Hitler’s cabinet full legislative powers for four years and allowed Hitler’s cabinet to bypass Germany’s constitution. After the Catholic Centre Party agreed to support it, it passed by a vote of 441–84.

Adolf Hitler was now in power to enact a number of important reforms and institute his progressive program without being impeded by a set-in-stone constitution or partisan bickering. He promised Germans a new society and his word for this was ‘volksgemeinschaft’, a ‘people’s community’.

He ended labor abuses and a number of strikes plaguing Germany by creating the German Labor Front as an umbrella organization to represent all workers, administrators, and company owners. He banned strikes, firings without government approval and lockouts. This ensured that government would be the ultimate protector of worker’s rights and the arbitrator of all labor disputes, something American labor leaders like Richard Trumka and Jimmy Hoffa Jr. have been advocating for years.

Farmers received subsidies and guaranteed prices for their crops in exchange for increased government supervision over what they grew and how they did it, and were given loans for tools, livestock and seed, as well as labor to work their farms by the state if needed.

While Hitler recognized the sanctity of private property, he also was emphatic that the government should have the power to regulate the use of private property for the good of the nation since it had been acquired with the help and use of public personnel and infrastructure, thus anticipating Elizabeth Warren by over seven decades.

At Hitler’s direction, his finance minister Hjalmar Schacht, instituted Keynesnian policies with large deficits and low interest rates combined with stimulus programs of pubic works to reduce unemployment. Hitler also mandated price freezes to prevent a recurrence of inflation. He started numerous public sector programs that actually got built, including the construction of dams, the autobahns, railroads, and public buildings, as well as a military build up that later superseded the public works policies while maintaining high employment and job creation.

Hitler financed much of Germany’s rearmament and rebuilding with promissory notes known as MEFO bills, which ensured that the 1% contributed their fair share of the cost. While Hitler’s government like FDR’s here in America ran a deficit, the MEFO bills allowed the German government to defer payment on goods and materials for needed projects while keeping Germans working and moving the economy forward. Another progressive idea was Hitler’s creation of the “Reinhardt Program” for growth that combined indirect incentives like tax credits and reductions with government investments in infrastructure.

Hitler and the Nazis also were very involved in picking winners and losers among Germany’s corporate and manufacturing concerns, swapping preferential treatment, government contracts and loans and policies that benefited specific well connected and supportive companies in exchange for political and financial support for Hitler and his policies. In essence, Hitler made sectors of German business his partners in building the Third Reich while suppressing other, non-supportive players… certainly a tactic we’ve seen used recently with great success.

Another aid to the German economic recovery was the gradual removal of Jews and other political enemies from business, the arts, the professions and civil service, about which more will be said later. German unemployment, which stood at six million in 1932, had been reduced to one million by 1936, the year the world saw a refurbished and invigorated Germany first hand as it hosted the Olympics.

Like his economic program, many of Hitler’s social programs also struck a resounding progressive chord.

Hitler revamped Germany’s healthcare system and made it truly universal as well as state subsidized. Hitler and the Nazis considered healthcare to be the right of all Germans, and there were numerous public-health campaigns in Nazi Germany urging healthy eating and exercise, and even no smoking campaigns at a time when cigarettes and cigars were being puffed with abandon worldwide. Water supplies were cleaned up, lead and mercury were removed from consumer products, and women were urged to undergo regular screenings for breast cancer.

Hitler enacted strong environmentalist legislation, such as the 1935 “Reich Nature Protection Act” which sought to control air and water pollution, reduce the use of coal and promote forest management and preservation. While the necessities of WWII eventually overrode many of these laws, it’s no exaggeration to refer to Adolf Hitler as a staunch environmentalist, and an outspoken champion of animal rights. As an animal lover and a strict vegetarian whom PETA would have been proud of, Hitler saw to it that extensive animal rights laws were passed, and even made an effort to ban hunting. He was a pioneer in this regard also. Many of the current animal welfare laws in Germany are adapted from laws originally introduced by Hitler and the Nazis.

But where Adolf Hitler showed himself a true progressive was in his interest in education and children. All teachers were required to join the German Teacher’s League (Nationalsozialistischer Lehrerbund) and were required to attend seminars and classes in teaching progressive values in the classroom. All German university professors were required to be members of the National Socialist Association of University Lecturers.

For Germany’s children, Hitler formed two compulsory organizations, the Hitler Youth for ages 14-18 and the Jungvolk, for ages 10-14. They were trained in Hitler’s progressive national Socialism, wore uniforms, performed public service, did physical fitness and were given meals and other benefits by the State. For girls, there were the League of German Maidens and the Young Girls League where girls along with similar activities to the boy’s groups were taught homemaking skills. Both the German Maidens and the Hitler Youth had to complete a year of ‘land service’ working on Germany’s farms or performing other public service. German women were encouraged to be mothers and homemakers, and had their own organizations, the National Socialist Women’s League and the Strength Through Joy movement.

Hitler deviated from the progressive ideal in that he was not a feminist, although he employed women as secretaries and was universally remembered by all of them as an ideal, courteous and sympathetic employer. Nor did he favor abortion on demand. But you have to consider both the prevailing social climate and morals of that time and place, the fact that much of Germany was Catholic, and the fact that he knew Germany needed a larger population to fulfill his political and territorial ambitions. To Hitler, Germany’s children were its future.

But in reality Hitler actually did introduce certain progressive policies in this regard as well.

The Nazis enthusiastically embraced eugenics and had no qualms about abortion and sterilization for those they considered unfit, weak minded, or inferior. In this, they agreed with progressive heroine Margaret Sanger, likewise a strong believer in eugenics who formed Planned Parenthood expressly with the idea of limiting non-white births and the reproduction of ‘the unfit’.

The Nazis were also quite open about the need to ration healthcare when it came to what they called ‘useless mouths’, This included the mentally ill, the disabled and handicapped, and in many cases people whom were simply terminally ill. Almost 300,000 people – that we know about – were killed by lethal injection in this way, not in concentration camps but in German medical facilities. Horrific as this may seem to some, this bears remembering when we look at the conversations about healthcare in our own time and examine the views of some of President Obama’s healthcare appointees. Hitler may once again to be proven to be a pioneer.

One of the major problems progressives have with embracing Hitler totally are his racial policies, particularly the ones directed at Jews. He also was anti-gay, although several prominent Nazis are rumored to have been gay or at least bi-sexual. Yes, these policies were problematic, even horrible. But if we examine these policies in detail, we find them to be largely a product of the existing political and moral climate of that time. Certainly that shouldn’t stop progressives from celebrating Hitler’s achievements while disapproving of some of his excesses and mistakes.

Keep reading here…………

***Emphasis added**

=================================

The Truth About MARGRET SANGER(This article first appeared in the January 20, 1992 edition of Citizen magazine)

How Planned Parenthood Duped America

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the “black” and “yellow” peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger’s other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as “scientific” and “humanitarian.” And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America’s human “breeding stock” and purging America’s “bad strains.” These “strains” included the “shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South.”

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as “unfit,” a plan she said would be the “salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were “irresponsible and reckless,” among whom she included those ” whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers.” She further contended that “there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.” That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered “unfit” cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood’s current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925), “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928), and many others.

More here……..

=====================================

Racism and threats actually were intiated by Southern Democrats and the KKK.

KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party

By Frances Rice

History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party.  This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Fonerthe renown liberal historian who is the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University.  As a further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is only the second person to serve as president of the three major professional organizations: the Organization of American Historians, American Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.


Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku Klux Klan.  Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of the Klan’s “The Kourier Magazine”: “I have never voted for any man who was not a regular Democrat.  My father … never voted for any man who was not a Democrat.  My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in reconstruction days….  My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat….  My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic party.”

Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by Democrats against Republicans, black and white.

On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: “Founded in 1866 as a Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders black and white.”  Page 184 of his book contains the definitive statements:  “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired the restoration of white supremacy.  It aimed to destroy the Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.”

Excerpted; Continue reading at:


http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.DYKKKKTerroristArmoftheDemocratParty&page_id=93&tp_preview=true

=========================

======================================

Abortion: Black Genocide

by REV. JESSE LEE PETERSON

Most of my life I had considered myself a Christian. Yet 18 years ago as I sat quietly and prayed, I experienced a deep realization – I harbored resentment in my heart. The realization caused me to repent and forgive. Forgiveness set me free from within, and I began to see with a clarity I never had before.

Soon after that life-changing experience, I started BOND to help black men overcome their resentments and find freedom. Soon I was helping men of every race as I saw mankind’s problems were universal.

I began to counsel young and older women as well. Many of the women I spoke to were having or have had at least one abortion. During the counseling sessions, I discovered that most of these women had guilt and low self-esteem. Often they had considered suicide.

I realized that this problem was not being dealt with by the black clergy or black politicians. In fact, to my surprise, abortion was often actually encouraged by these “leaders.”

Abortion was first popularized by Margaret Sanger, a white woman who was the founder of the National Birth Control League (now Planned Parenthood). Sanger was a lifelong champion of birth control and eugenics (the movement devoted to “improving” the human species by control of hereditary factors in reproduction).

Margaret Sanger called for the sterilization of “genetically inferior races.” In 1939, she organized her “Negro Project” and wrote: “The poorer areas, particularly in the South … are producing alarmingly more than their share of future generations.”

Sanger’s plan has worked extraordinarily well over time – today numerous black religious leaders defend the “right” of women to kill their unborn children. It’s ironic to me that black leaders complain about racism, yet they promote one of the most racist practices in this country – abortion.

Abortion propagandists have dehumanized the unborn baby just as was done with the Jews in the Holocaust. In his book “Abortion Practice,” Warren Hern, M.D. compares the unborn child to a “parasite,” which was the exact word Hitler used to dehumanize Jewish people in his infamous “Mein Kampf.”

The alarming numbers on abortion:

  • Since 1973, when abortion became legal there have been more than 14 million black babies killed in the black woman’s womb;
  • Since 1973, more than twice as many blacks have died from abortion than from heart disease, cancer, accidents, violent crimes and AIDS combined;
  • More than 1, 450 black children are aborted each day in the United States.(Source: U.S. Center for Disease Control)

Over the years I have counseled and picketed at abortion clinics across the country.

I will never forget the story of a 13-year-old black girl I met at an abortion clinic in Los Angeles one Saturday morning. My organization was protesting near the clinic when I saw the young lady approach the front door. I talked to her, and tried to encourage her to put her baby up for adoption. She said it was too late. She had gone into the clinic that Thursday and the doctor had injected something into her womb. For three days the baby KICKED AND GASPED FOR LIFE. On the third day, the baby died. The girl told me she was encouraged to do this by her mother and boyfriend.

Those employees in the clinic told her she wouldn’t feel anything. They said that she was carrying a fetus and not a baby.

Abortion has also given black men one more way to be irresponsible. Because of the weakness of the father and the lack of morality in the black community, many black women feel they have no other choice but abortion.

[...]

It is time for America, but especially the black community, to come out of its state of denial and realize that true racism is the attack on the black unborn baby, started by Margaret Sanger and carried out by the liberal elite in this country. The solution to this problem is a strong belief in the Creator, strong families and self-respect.

Read more here……

================================

===========================================

Sanger speech to KKK

***Did YOU notice the “Heil” Arm salute of the KKK?***

===================

AND THIS:

Margaret Sanger Jews,Latinos human weeds

 

 

 

 

 

===============================

Last comment: Obama states he wants gun control to protect our children from harm……

President Obama supports/defends ABORTION that KILLS Millions of children PER YEAR.

Dialectic Process (Brainwashing) of Americans continues………

==============================

Obama’s Ideological Father: “Gramsci… organized the Italian Communist party in 1921…. Since this was four years after the Russian Revolution, Gramsci assumed Italians would welcome a Bolshevik convulsion of their own. But it didn’t happen.

He found three explanations: Christianity, nationalism and charity the way to set the stage for a Marxist revolution was in coming to grips with these three conditions….

  • The first stratagem was the assault on Christianity by arguing religion should not inform or be employed in public discourse. Gramsci realized that if religion were confined to private worship, its hold on Italians would dissipate….

  • Second… Gramsci contended Italians were part of a grand global mission….

  • Last… Gramsci engaged in efforts to persuade Italians that the way, the only way, to express humanitarian concern for the poor or those left behind as the detritus of capitalism is through a government that can be benevolent….

“Obama… has suggested overtly and tacitly that religion should be a matter relegated to private worship outside the confines of public life…. [Through] his proposal to deny tax deductions for charitable gifts, government is being converted into the only public charity. Moreover, the transfer of wealth in the stimulus package and the increased tax burden on the most productive element of society will inevitably decrease incentives and expand the size and influence of government….. Our leaders may not identify themselves as Gramscians and may even mock the designation, but make no mistake: Gramsci’s DNA is in their bloodstream.”

Totalitarianism means total government control: No earthly freedom to deviate from politically correct ideology! No personal property that’s not subject to government regulations. No public communication without surveillance. No escape from the ever-tightening boundaries of government regulations and global standards.  No personal rights to follow God and share His Truth.

The pathway to socialist oppression is no longer bloody revolutions. The omnipresent dialectic process is far more subtle and effective. Enhanced by the steady drumbeat of the media’s pervasive, suggestive and anti-Christian stimuli, minds are dulled and the masses indoctrinated everywhere. While people in the Soviet Union knew they were trapped in a cruel system, many could still think factually and logically. Today’s managers of mind-control have nearly perfected the social “science” of collective brainwashing.

LINK

======================

RELATED LINKS:

The Obama Smoke Screen about Contraceptives: More in the Lines of Our Totalitarian Eugenicist-in-Chief and World “Sustainability” (Population Control)

=====================================

Secret Planned Parenthood Memo: Stop Maternity Coverage. Are Eugenics a la Obama in America’s Future?

****************

Science Czar John Holdren’s Eugenicist Idol….Harrison Brown; Ezekiel Emanuel and Cass Sunstein’s Life/Lives Systems (Darwinism). Rockefeller Subsidized Government Programs (NSSM 200)

*************************

President Obama Signs Executive Order Allowing for Control Over All US Resources. Is the Center for American Progress the Shadow Party that Controls Obama?

=========================

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels quotes   <<<Hitler’s Propagandist

=====================================

*********************

It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true…You are what the media define you to be.” (Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Watson).

*************************

=============================

Do YOUR RESEARCH; Search for the TRUTH…….

============================

================================================

Fear and Intimidation Used to Silence Exposure/Floodlights on Progressives. Meet the ‘BULLIES’ and Their Tactics.

===========

======================================

The Liberal Progressives have learned their Saul Alinsky tactics well:

==========================

=======================

Saul Alinsky Tactics:

“Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. … Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.” p.126

Always remember the first rule of power tactics (pps.127-134):

1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat…. [and] the collapse of communication.

3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.”

6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time….”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside… every positive has its negative.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.  In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and ‘frozen.’…

>     “…any target can always say, ‘Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?’ When your ‘freeze the target,’ you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments…. Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the ‘others’ come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target…’

“One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other.” (pps.127-134)

SOURCE

==========================

From Breitbart

MEET THE ‘BULLIES’: BREITBART EDITOR EXPOSES OBAMA’S ARMY OF THUGS IN NEW BOOK

by Ben Shapiro

January 7, 2013

*****

President Obama and his leftist allies like to claim they’re anti-bullying. They stand up for the little guy. They stand up to the powerful. They protect victims.

They’re liars. What’s more, they’re the true bullies, as I explain in my new book, Bullies: How The Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences America (Threshold Editions, January 8, 2013).

Ben Shapiro %22Bullies%22

Standing up to the bullying of the left was Andrew Breitbart’s chief mission in life. That’s why Bullies is dedicated to him – Andrew was a mentor to me. I met him when I was 17 years old, a sophomore at UCLA. Andrew saw a column I wrote in the UCLA Daily Bruin and emailed me. That’s what Andrew did. He identified people who wanted to fight back, and he nurtured them. That’s why he’s so irreplaceable. And that’s why we must live up to his dream: of an American public empowered to fight the bullies.

It’s a fight we must embrace. Leftist bullying reaches new heights every day. And it has found its apex in the Obama administration.

Just take a look at the White House anti-bullying program. In March 2011, President Obama led a White House conference on the supposed scourge of bullying plaguing America. There hadn’t been an uptick in childhood bullying by any available measure; in fact, bullying was down across the board. But President Obama spoke up loud and strong against bullying. “Bullying isn’t a problem that makes headlines every day,” he boomed. “But every day it touches the lives of young people all across this country.” He launched a website under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services to combat bullying. And, of course, he joined forces with the It Gets Better Project.

But Obama wasn’t really against bullying, as I explain in Bullies. When the DHS wasn’t busy running StopBullying.gov, they were busy bullying religious employers into violating their consciences by forcing them to cover contraception for employees. And who headed up the It Gets Better Project? Dan Savage, the thug who screamed at Christian teenagers who had the temerity to walk out on one of his anti-Biblical screeds.

Obama isn’t against bullying. Neither is the left more broadly. After all, when someone stands up to a bully – say, Israel standing up to Islamic terrorists, or even George Zimmerman standing up to a young bully pounding his head into the pavement – the left goes berserk.

Actually, the American left has become the greatest purveyor of bullying during the last half-century. That’s the dirty little secret: buried beneath all of the left’s supposed hatred for bullying is a passionate love for bullying—the use of power to force those who disagree to shut up, back down, or face crushing consequences up to and including loss of reputation, career destruction, and even death.

In order to accomplish their bullying tactics, however, the left has to portray itself as the defender of victimized groups. Those who oppose their political agenda are then portrayed as oppressors of those victimized groups, morally deficient folks who deserve to be run out of town on a rail. The agenda supposedly starts with anti-bullying. It ends with bullying the hell out of everyone on the other side of the aisle.

The left’s goal is to shut down the political debate by decrying their opponents as victimizers. They label their opponents racist, sexist, bigoted, homophobic, benighted, backwards bitter clingers. They liken them to Nazis, KKK members, terrorists. Then they cast them out like lepers from the political debate. Because who would bother debating a Nazi, or a KKK member, or a terrorist?

This is how the left wins arguments. They polarize Americans from each other. They separate us by groups. They divide us, and they conquer us. They convince us that we’re either victims who deserve recompense or oppressors who must bow to the yoke.

We are no longer E Pluribus Unum. Disagree with President Obama? That’s because you hate black people. (Want to ignore 14% black unemployment, though, and you’re a hero to the left.)

Keep reading here……..

==================================

RELATED LINKS:

Compare 1966 to TODAY (Occupy Wall Street); What do you see? Progressive Remix of Marxist/Communist Ideology

*****************

Are Liberals Using Intimidation/Shame tactics (ends justify any means) in Wisconsin Recall Election? Where is Eric Holder in This?

***************

The Progressives Like to Use The Word Racist: Let’s Discuss Racism and the DEMOCRATS

*********************

Democrats Should Know Jim Crow, They Created Him. Racism at its finest.

************************

Is the Black Civil Rights Mafia Betraying Black America?

=======================================

Using tactics straight out Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has released a scathing report attempting to isolate and ridicule the Tea Party movement. Filled with leftist talking points and blanket statements, the SPLC report,Rage On The Right: The Year in Hate and Extremism, asserts Tea Party alignment to “Timothy McVeigh and Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph,” “hate groups,” “furious anti-immigrant vigilante groups,”and  ”so-called ‘Patriot’ groups.” In the eyes of the SPLC, the average American citizen is

“shot through with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism.”

The report identifies “Tenth Amendment Resolutions based on the constitutional provision” as signs of growing radicalization. Wow. It’s now radical to uphold the Constitution. Ironically America’s Founding Fathers were radicals in their day when they wrote the Constitution.

As it echoes themes from the Department of Homeland Security report last year on right-wing extremism the report provides no background support for its accusations and fails to acknowledge the wide variety of left wing extremism. Clearly its author Mark Potok missed the recent news about violent left wing extremists  Joseph Stack and Amy Bishop. I think it’s about time to ‘Alinsky’ the Alinskyites.

Continue reading more here:


http://www.newsrealblog.com

**********************

Another political letter tapping public information to shame and intimidate.

********************

Obama’s NLRB Unleashes Ambush Elections on America’s Job Creators. Will “Mafia Style” Protection Money from Businesses Come in the Form of Union Dues?

******************

==========================

Intimidation, threats are the mainstay of Big Labor.

What a lot of Americans don’t know is the history of Richard Trumka, the Mine Workers Union and a mine worker during a strike in 1993.

The DEATH of Eddie York:

Trouble viewing video? Click Here.

========================

Union Violence Meets the Sopranos

Trouble viewing video? Click HERE

==============================

Let’s discuss this further:

1993: Trumka Goons Gunned Down Eddie York. Union Intimidation and Tactics Exposed. **PLUS: Saul Alinsky’s time with the Mafia

================================

From: The Progress Report

Interview with Saul Alinsky, Part Four

Saul Alinsky was interviewed by Playboy in 1972.  Alinsky was asked about his “learned experience” from the MOB.


http://www.progress.org/2003/alinsky5.htm

*************

Interview with Saul Alinsky Part Five

Excerpt:

ALINSKY: None at all, since there was nothing I could do to stop them from murdering, practically all of which was done inside the family. I was a nonparticipating observer in their professional activities, although I joined their social life of food, drink and women: Boy, I sure participated in that side of things — it was heaven. And let me tell you something, I learned a hell of a lot about the uses and abuses of power from the mob, lessons that stood me in good stead later on, when I was organizing.


http://www.progress.org/2003/alinsky6.htm

*************************

==============================

Rubbing Raw the Sores of Discontent Then Galvanize Them. Independent VOTERS: Educate Yourself to the Ideology Trying to Take Hold in America

Excerpt:

Rub raw the sores of social discontent

“The despair is there; now it’s up to us to go in and rub raw the sores of discontent, galvanize them for radical social change. We’ll give them a way to participate in the democratic process, a way to exercise their rights as citizens and strike back at the establishment that oppresses them, instead of giving in to apathy. We’ll start with specific issues — taxes, jobs, consumer problems, pollution — and from there move on to the larger issues: pollution in the Pentagon and the Congress and the board rooms of the megacorporations. Once you organize people, they’ll keep advancing from issue to issue toward the ultimate objective: people power. We’ll not only give them a cause, we’ll make life goddamn exciting for them again — life instead of existence. We’ll turn them on. – Saul Alinsky

================================

 

==============================

RELATED LINKS:

Union Thuggery: Ohio Business Owner Terrorized and SHOT for being NON-UNION

********************

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka’s Ugly History of Violence and Corruption

*******************

Union Thuggery: More Criminality in Verizon Strike. Has the Union gone too Far? Saul Alinsky tactics learned from MOB?

***********************

Union Thuggery and Big Labor Greed

***********************

================================

=============================================

How the Left Lies its Way to ‘Facts’. Resorting to Adolph Hitler, Goebbels Style Propaganda?

From Canada Free Press:

By Warner Todd Huston

December 6, 2011

There was once a famous liberal congressman from New York who reminded his opponents that they could have their own opinions but not their own facts. This, of course, was Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of the few respectable liberals of his or any other day. But, for the most part, the left operates on pushing the lie until it is accepted as “fact” whether it is true or not. And the leftist blog Crooks and Liars pulled a doosie this week.

Apparently the guffaw inducing leftist blog thinks that the Occupy protests have been completely peaceful despite the hundreds of arrests, the rapes, the property destruction, theft, and other various act of lawbreaking! No, they are not joking.

C&L, blogger John Amato centered his risible claim upon the video of the “bedlam” that occurred at a recent college football game that saw the Oklahoma State University Cowboys beat the University of Oklahoma Sooners. As the game ended, OSU fans flooded the field to celebrate. Unfortunately, in their exuberance to tear down the goal posts upwards to twelve fans were hurt.

Amato called this a “riot.”

“Some reports called it as terrifying as a natural disaster,” Amato luridly began. “Thousands of crazed fans rushed onto the field. It’s a typical response at many college football games, but this one caused massive injuries to people participating in the rioting.”

Rioting? It was hardly a “riot.” It wasn’t anything to excuse, mind you, but to call it a riot is hyperventilating at its worst.

I have to thank Tina Korbe who brought this to my attention at her HotAir blog. Now, I don’t bother much with lefty blogs. After all, who needs lefty blogs when the Old Media fills that bill so excruciatingly? Usually I only hit the lefty blogs when I want to see the left’s reaction to a particularly hot story, so this one I missed. But Korbe was at that game and she has a first hand account of the “riot.”

Now, it just so happens that I was in Stillwater, Okla., for this game — and I’d characterize the atmosphere afterward as anything but violent. Jubilant, ecstatic, buoyant, sure. But violent? Not so much. Nevertheless, it’s incumbent upon me to say — and, honestly, I’m very happy to say it — that injuries caused by excessive celebration after a football game are unnecessary, inexcusable and regrettable.

Korbe’s account aside, it is easy to see that the fans on the field were not there to destroy the place. Save tearing down the goal posts, as stupid a tradition as there ever was, the fans were just happy not overly destructive. This was hardly the sort of riots we’ve seen in years past when pro basketball teams have won the big game.

Regardless, Amato seriously tried to compare the “riot” at the football game to the “peaceful” OWS protests. He lamented that OWSers were treated to pepper spray and had the evil police pushing them around. Those poor OWSers were treated to a “Stasi-type response” by the man… man. Why, those kindly OWSers were just “sleeping in tents,” ya know? What could be more peaceful?

Amato then went on to decry the money that it cost “to medically transport and treat severely wounded people and clean up after this violent outburst.”

All this arm waving and foaming at the mouth is a perfect example of the great lie, a misdirection used to distract people into accepting that his underlying premise was fact. However, in truth it is the OWS “movement” that has cost cities across this land — and therefore you and I as taxpayers — millions of dollars in police overtime, repairs to destroyed public property, and streets and san clean-up crews that had to dispose of the OWSers bodily fluids left in bottles all over these “protests.”

Worse, the act of injudicious jubilation at the football game was nothing compared to the nearly 400 criminal acts perpetrated by OWSers at their anarchic “protests.” And this does not include the breaking of the many thousands of small laws — like permit requirements, vagrancy laws, and rules meant to keep protests orderly and safe for both protesters and passersby. In fact, every single OWS protest has broken these laws. None of them got permits, none of them observed any of the laws and ordinances passed by the cities in which they gathered.

This is quite unlike the Tea Party movement that was forced to hold to every single tiny little law on the books to be “allowed” to hold their protests over the last two years. Further, this is unlike the Tea Partiers that had no arrests, no destruction of private property, no rapes, no… well, nothing like the criminal activity perpetrated by the Occupiers.

More here……..

===========================

RELATED LINK: Read by clicking on blue letters below.

The President Willingly Lied to You

=============================

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels quotes

=========================

=========================

ADDITIONAL LINKS:

============================

Trouble viewing video? Click Here.

“World as it is…or world as it should be”? At 5:26 to 5:43 in above video.

As an organizer I start from where the world is, as it is, not as I would like it to be. That we accept the world as it is does not in any sense weaken our desire to change it into what we believe it should be – it is necessary to begin where the world is if we are going to change it to what we think it should be. That means working in the system.  

~~Saul Alinsky

================================

Should HUAC (House Un-American Activities Committee) Be Re-Instated?

*****************************

The THUG Optics,Words and Actions Used by Obama Campaign and Supporters…..Alinsky Would Be Proud

===============

=====================

First, YOU need to UNDERSTAND that Saul Alinsky studied the Antonio Gramsci (Italian Communist) and promoted it in his tactics.  Saul Alinsky ALSO studied the Mafia mob tactics under Frank Nitti of the Al Capone mob.

READ:

Marxism in America through Gradualism and Dialectic Process Ideology of Antonio Gramsci (Italian Communist). Saul Alinsky Tactics based on Gramsci.

Excerpt:

Antonio Gramsci was a transformational Marxist. As laid out in the above linked article, what Gramsci advocated was the transformation of a society to the communist state via gradualism — the gradual erosion of old ideals, replacing them with the new. As opposed to Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and Mussolini, Gramsci advocated the quiet revolution.

The Hegelian Dialectic of thesis (and idea), antithesis (the opposite), and synthesis (the bringing together of opposites) to form a new thesis, ever evolving, plays a heavy role in the gradualism Gramsci proposed. Today, in America, the Hegelian Dialectic is played out in meetings at every level, all across America, under the name of consensus building using facilitators heavily trained in group dynamics.

*****************

Rules for Radicals

By Saul Alinsky - 1971

Saul Alinsky’s tactics were based, not on Stalin’s revolutionary violence, but on the Neo-Marxist strategies of  Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. Relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process rather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci’s transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed the deliberate changes.

Like Alinsky, Mikhail Gorbachev followed Gramsci, not Lenin. In fact, Gramsci aroused Stalins’s wrath by suggesting that Lenin’s revolutionary plan wouldn’t work in the West. Instead the primary assault would be on Biblical absolutes and Christian values, which must be crushed as a social force before the new face of Communism could rise and flourish. Malachi Martin gave us a progress report:

“By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy in the West was weak and negligible…. Gramsci’s master strategy was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity’s transcendent God.”

“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…. The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means… The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be….”pp.25-26

“The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means….” p.29

“The seventh rule… is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics….” p.34

“The tenth rule… is you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.… It involves sifting the multiple factors which combine in creating the circumstances at any given time… Who, and how many will support the action?… If weapons are needed, then are appropriate d weapons available? Availability of means determines whether you will be underground or above ground; whether you will move quickly or slowly…” p.36

Notes: Apparently, Michelle Obama referred to these words during her Democratic National Convention speech:

“She said, ‘Barack stood up that day,’ talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, ‘and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about ‘The world as it is‘ and ‘The world as it should be…’ And, ‘All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an obligation to, fight for the world as it should be.”

Do you wonder who — or whose values — should determine what “the world… should be?”

SOURCE

 ====================

How Obama Revolution Came to America: Antonio Gramsci and Saul Alinsky Style

Excerpt:

How Obama Revolution Came to America

AIM Report  |  By Robert Chandler  |

April 6, 2009

This material has been excerpted, edited and updated from one chapter of Robert Chandler’s important new book, Shadow World, published by Regnery.

S. Steven Powell wrote in his 1987 book, Covert Cadre, that the revolutionary activity advocated by Marxist Antonio Gramsci involved the need to “infiltrate autonomous institutions—schools, media, churches, public-interest groups—so as radically to transform the culture, which determines the environment in which political and economic policies are played out.” Or, as Carl Boggs, author ofGramsci’s Marxism wrote, “the role of revolutionary theory is to create the foundation of a new socialist order precisely through the negation and transcendence of bourgeois society.” This “transcendence of bourgeois society,” Boggs explains, was the basis for Gramsci’s first priority—“the multi-dimensional transformation of civil society.”

The key to Gramsci’s formula for revolution centered on the idea of breaking what he called the “hegemony” or mind-control exercised by the ruling capitalists over the masses. Bourgeois societies were ruled, Gramsci believed, by educating the citizenry that their accommodation of the moral, political, and cultural values defined by the governing system was in their best interests. Hence, Gramsci designed a “reversal strategy” that would silently challenge the existing culture and value-systems that dominated bourgeois governance. That is to say, his formula was based on an ideological struggle that would transform a whole range of activities in civil society, including Judeo-Christian values, the family, schools, unions, and politics and popular trust in the existing government. 

There are ten easy steps toward a progressive-socialist-Marxist civil society: change the popular consensus; destroy Christianity, the traditional family, and existing social mores; transform the culture; install a radical Left mind-control; attain political power; impose strict control of the military and law enforcement; restrict freedom; socialize the economy; erase American sovereignty; and embrace a world without borders. 

 

Four political arenas have been constructed by the progressive-socialist-Marxist Left to “format” or erase America’s collective brain and install a mind-control program into what is to become a robotic America of theological radicalism, socialist unionism, radical community-state politics, and the “Shadow Party” owned and operated by billionaires such as George Soros.

=====================

ADD Mafia/Mob tactics Alinsky style:

If YOU haven’t read this, it is HIGHLY SUGGESTED that you do.  How Alinsky learned mob tactics under Frank Nitti of the Al Capone mob.

Full Interview of Alinsky by Playboy magazine

Excerpt talking about the mob:

PLAYBOY: Did you continue your life of crime?

ALINSKY: Crime? That wasn’t crime — it was survival — But my Robin Hood days were short-lived; logically enough, I was awarded the graduate Social Science Fellowship in criminology, the top one in that field, which took care of my tuition and room and board — I still don’t know why they gave it to me — maybe because I hadn’t taken a criminology course in my life and didn’t know one goddamn thing about the subject — But this was the Depression and I felt like someone had tossed me a life preserver — Hell, if it had been in shirt cleaning, I would have taken it. Anyway, I found out that criminology was just as removed from actual crime and criminals as sociology was from society, so I decided to make my doctoral dissertation a study of the Al Capone mob — an inside study.

PLAYBOY: What did Capone have to say about that?

ALINSKY: Well, my reception was pretty chilly at first — I went over to the old Lexington Hotel, which was the gang’s headquarters, and I hung around the lobby and the restaurant. I’d spot one of the mobsters whose picture I’d seen in the papers and go up to him and say, “I’m Saul Alinsky, I’m studying criminology, do you mind if I hang around with you?” And he’d look me over and say, “Get lost, punk.” This happened again and again, and I began to feel I’d never get anywhere. Then one night I was sitting in the restaurant and at the next table was Big Ed Stash, a professional assassin who was the Capone mob’s top executioner. He was drinking with a bunch of his pals and he was saying, “Hey, you guys, did I ever tell you about the time I picked up that redhead in Detroit?” and he was cut off by a chorus of moans. “My God,” one guy said, “do we have to hear that one again?” I saw Big Ed’s face fall; mobsters are very sensitive, you know, very thin-skinned. And I reached over and plucked his sleeve. “Mr. Stash,” I said, “I’d love to hear that story.” His face lit up. “You would, kid?” He slapped me on the shoulder. “Here, pull up a chair. Now, this broad, see . . .” And that’s how it started.

Big Ed had an attentive audience and we became buddies. He introduced me to Frank Nitti, known as the Enforcer, Capone’s number-two man, and actually in de facto control of the mob because of Al’s income-tax rap. Nitti took me under his wing. I called him the Professor and I became his student. Nitti’s boys took me everywhere, showed me all the mob’s operations, from gin mills and whorehouses and bookie joints to the legitimate businesses they were beginning to take over. Within a few months, I got to know the workings of the Capone mob inside out.

PLAYBOY: Why would professional criminals confide their secrets to an outsider?

ALINSKY: Why not? What harm could I do them? Even if I told what I’d learned, nobody would listen. They had Chicago tied up tight as a drum; they owned the city, from the cop on the beat right up to the mayor. Forget all that Eliot Ness shit; the only real opposition to the mob came from other gangsters, like Bugs Moran or Roger Touhy. The Federal Government could try to nail ‘em on an occasional income tax rap, but inside Chicago they couldn’t touch their power. Capone was the establishment. When one of his boys got knocked off, there wasn’t any city court in session, because most of the judges were at the funeral and some of them were pallbearers. So they sure as hell weren’t afraid of some college kid they’d adopted as a mascot causing them any trouble. They never bothered to hide anything from me; I was their one-man student body and they were anxious to teach me. It probably appealed to their egos.

Once, when I was looking over their records, I noticed an item listing a $7500 payment for an out-of-town killer. I called Nitti over and I said, “Look, Mr. Nitti, I don’t understand this. You’ve got at least 20 killers on your payroll. Why waste that much money to bring somebody in from St. Louis?” Frank was really shocked at my ignorance. “Look, kid,” he said patiently, “sometimes our guys might know the guy they’re hitting, they may have been to his house for dinner, taken his kids to the ball game, been the best man at his wedding, gotten drunk together. But you call in a guy from out of town, all you’ve got to do is tell him, ‘Look, there’s this guy in a dark coat on State and Randolph; our boy in the car will point him out; just go up and give him three in the belly and fade into the crowd.’ So that’s a job and he’s a professional, he does it. But one of our boys goes up, the guy turns to face him and it’s a friend, right away he knows that when he pulls that trigger there’s gonna be a widow, kids without a father, funerals, weeping — Christ, it’d be murder.” I think Frank was a little disappointed by my even questioning the practice; he must have thought I was a bit callous.

========================

Do LARGE Unions like the AFL-CIO, SEIU, AFSCME, Teamsters, et.al use a Cosa Nostra style of upper management to worker mentality? From the “Boss” to the “persuaders” to the “enforcers” down to the menial union member?

Do today’s LARGE Unions utilize Mob/Thug tactics?

Cosa Nostra Chart

================================

Link to video

******************

==============================

RELATED LINKS:

Team Obama downplays call for ‘revenge’

===================

OBAMA’S VIOLENT AGENDA HITS HOME

Excerpts:

To put things into perspective, my neighborhood is racially diverse, and I hope it always will be.

In 2008, however, most of my black neighbors placed Obama campaign signs in their yards. Distressed by racial identity politics, I wrote an op-ed called “Christ, Obama and America.”

This year, Obama/Biden campaigners and self-proclaimed “community organizers” have been knocking on every door – including my family’s door – for months. But Obama/Biden signs weren’t yet on display, so we thought the majority of their 2008 supporters had changed their minds due to Obama’s and Biden’s record. Then, in mid-October, two black households near mine put out Obama/Biden signs.

These two neighbors declare themselves Christian. One declares herself Catholic and pro-life, but something is amiss in the thought process of many Christians.

[...]

Instead of arguing with this couple, I taped a Romney/Ryan sign to the inside of our glass storm door.

I also taped a homemade sign beneath it: “Choose Life, Not Death.” Under that headline, I placed the words of Moses from Deuteronomy 30:19-20: “I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse; therefore choose life, that you and your descendants may live, loving the LORD your God, obeying his voice, and clinging to him …”

Within minutes of closing the door, someone shattered the glass in broad daylight. As I was on the phone with police, I saw someone steal our American flag.

So there it was: a striking example of Obama supporters’ tolerance.

White conservatives and adults aren’t the only targets of leftists. After black conservative Ron Miller published his Christian memoir, “Sellout: Musings from Uncle Tom’s Porch,” which I edited, his home property was vandalized.

==============================

Democrats Vandalize More Allen West Signs

Allen West street sign before-

West sign after

============================

Valerie Jarret – “After We Win This Election, It’s Our Turn. Payback Time.” (WSI)

( “After we win this election, it’s our turn.  Payback time.” )

NOTE:  This update was forwarded to me byWall Street Insider who indicated they received it this morning via a direct source associated with Barack Obama’s campaign headquarters in Chicago.

__________________________

 

Thought you would be very interested to hear of this.  It appears this Jarrett creature is quite confident of a victory, and has every intention of making those who opposed her, and her boy, of paying dearly for their seeming crimes against them.  As Election Day is nearly upon us, more and more are willing to speak outside the inner circle.  Such is the case with this message received by me this morning from a source who has been working for us via Chicago for several months now. Their campaign appears increasingly confident, I assume, due to the now adoring media coverage of their boy’s little march with the commoners following this week’s storm.  It has been a revolting display by some in our media has it not?  Here then is the most recent report I received our Chicago source.  I first passed it along to our mutual friend with no response, so now I  pass it along to you in the hopes you deem it worthy to publish as its sharingwill serve a related purpose with another I hope to secure a favor from in the very near future.  And if you have any concerns regarding the source – don’t.  They are being thoroughly protected despite their understandable trepidation.  As you have been.

And while our friend was clearly upset yesterday with how the storm altered our immediate strategies that were to have concluded this final week of the campaign,  I prefer to believe all is in God’s hands, and if that was to be, then so be it.  My efforts remain undiminished, if not my strength.  I hope youshare my belief and determination in that regard.  That said, there has been movement favoring Obama over the last few days.  Such is the reality that we must now deal with and plan accordingly.  Crying nor profanity will assist in successfully navigating that reality.

-WSI

______________________

HERE NOW IS THE UPDATE WSI RECEIVED VIA A SOURCE FROM CHICAGO THIS MORNING:

A rep from Jarrett office was in today. She gave us a finish line pep talk and then afterwards, heard her saying how Jarrett is very excited about a 2nd term agenda and a big part of that agenda is to punish everyone who opposed them during the first term and the campaign.  Strange that everything was “Ms. Jarrett wants this, and Ms. Jarrett is looking forward to that”.  You hardly heard Obama’s name mentioned by her which I guess reinforces what people are saying.  Valerie Jarrett really is the power in the White House.  I know that when her representative showed up it was like royalty was visiting.  All the big dogs were lined up to meet her and acting real friendly and they gave us a heads up an hour before and told us we better “put on a good show” while she was here.

The part that really stuck out to me was when I overheard the rep say that Jarrett told them, “After we win this election, it’s our turn.  Payback time.  Everyone not with us is against us and they better be ready because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay.  Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. No election to worry about after this is over and we have two judges ready to go.”  She was talking directly to about three of them.  Sr. staff.  And she wasn’t trying to be quiet about it at all.  And they were all listening and shaking their heads and smiling while she said it.  Pretty creepy.

Why are they so confident about winning next week?  We aren’t getting any numbers in the officethat has any of us knowing Obama will win.  It will be close.  Jarrett and her people seem so confident.  Why is that?  Do you have any information on why she is so confident?  I’m worried.  Benghazi was supposed to play big this weekend.  That is what everybody here was bracing for last week.  You could really tell the staffers were freaking out.   Now nobody is talking about it.  Like it was never a concern.  Like it never even happened. Don’t you have people to help with that?  What happened?  You said it was going to be a game changer.  I told some others it would be and now I’m kind of hanging out there.   Not the only one around here who got a real bad vibe after the Alex thing.  Help!  Need some good news after today!

 SOURCE

=============================

Muslim Cleric With Ties To Bin Laden Endorses Barack Obama…

==============================

======================

=============

TRUE THE VOTE ANNOUNCES NATIONAL ELECTION INTEGRITY HOTLINE

Excerpt:

Today, True the Vote (TTV), the nonpartisan election integrity organization, announced the availability of its Election Integrity Hotline, to help document illegal activity inside or outside of America’s polling places.

=======================

===================================

Obama and his ilk claim to be “Uniters” and use “Civility”……REALLY?

============================

The Malignant Narcissist and the Benghazi ‘Snuff Film’. Will the Need for Obama’s Inner Ego to be Admired actually Disable His Effectiveness?

========

====================

From American Thinker:


The Malignant Narcissist and the Benghazi ‘Snuff Film’

November 5, 2012

By Fay Voshell

Credible sources indicate that the president of the United States watched in real time what might well be called the Benghazi snuff film.

Among those sources is retired Lt. Col. Tony Schaffer.  At the time of the assault, Shaffer relates, two U.S. drones were hovering to the consulate and recorded the final hours of the attack, which killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other brave Americans.

“This was in the middle of the business day in Washington, so everybody at the White House, CIA, Pentagon, everybody was watching this go down,” Shaffer said on Fox News.  “According to my sources, yes, [Obama] was one of those in the White House Situation Room in real-time watching this.”

Frankly, I have found myself wondering what sort of president could sit through a viewing of what was essentially a snuff film.

What sort of man could watch Americans fighting and dying while his administration gave the order for rescuers to “stand down?”

The same sort of president who would demand that he and he alone be the final arbiter of the fate of the persons assigned to his “kill list”?  And, yes, there really is a “kill list.”

According to the New York Times, a paper known to be a shill for the president, there is a ritual for figuring out who is next to be snuffed:

It is the strangest of bureaucratic rituals: Every week or so, more than 100 members of the government’s sprawling national security apparatus gather, by secure video teleconference, to pore over terrorist suspects’ biographies and recommend to the president who should be the next to die.

This secret “nominations” process is an invention of the Obama administration, a grim debating society that vets the PowerPoint slides bearing the names, aliases, and life stories of suspected members of Al Qaeda’s branch in Yemen or its allies in Somalia’s Shabab militia. …

The nominations go to the White House, where by his own insistence and guided by Mr. Brennan, Mr. Obama must approve any name. He signs off on every strike in Yemen and Somalia and also on the more complex and risky strikes in Pakistan – about a third of the total.

The Times article goes on to ask: “Could he [Obama] order the targeted killing of an American citizen, in a country with which the United States was not at war, in secret and without the benefit of a trial?”  Since the Benghazi debacle, we certainly can hazard a guess that the answer is “Yes.”

Back to the original question — namely, what sort of person could coldly organize killings and take in snuff films without a normal reaction?  I believe that Erich Fromm, author of The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness can help us understand just what we are dealing with in president Obama.  His analysis of malignant narcissism fits Barack Obama’s profile to a tee.

One of the chief characteristics of the malignant narcissist: He is interested only in himself, his desires, his thought, his wishes… his ideas, his past, his plans; the world is real only as far as it s the object of his schemes and desires; other people matter only as far as they serve him or can be used; he always knows everything better than anyone else.

Fromm goes farther in his profile, writing that such a person lacks love, tenderness, or empathy for anybody.  He is cold and pitiless.  He deceives by exhibiting apparent warmth, but in fact the warmth is only superficial.  He might show “courtesy, charm, tranquility, correctness, amiability and self-control,” but the dominant traits of coldness and lack of empathy remain deep within.

He may have a talent for influencing, impressing, and persuading, Fromm continues.  He may have personal magnetism so strong that he mesmerizes those who meet him or hear him speak.

These virtues, combined with absolute certainty about his generally simplistic ideas, mean he is implacably opposed to those who might question his authority.  Because of his egotistical self-centeredness, he feels uneasy with people who are his equals or superiors, wishing to be always in the position of the Infallible One.  He covers up his inadequacies with a veneer characterized by amiability, kindness, consideration, and courtesy.  But he actually has two faces: a friendly one and a horrifying one.  Both are genuine.

If he is in a position of leadership, he often pursues his goals with unwavering determination and an iron will to win regardless of consequences.  Therefore, human lives and their destruction are immaterial to his goals and may even be his desire.

Fromm concludes his analysis of the malignant narcissist with the following observations:

I had still another aim: that of pointing to the main fallacy which prevents people from recognizing potential Hitlers before they show their true faces. This fallacy lies in the belief that a thoroughly destructive and evil man must be a devil – and look his part; that he must be devoid of any positive quality; that he must bear the sign of Cain so visibly that everyone can recognize his destructiveness from afar. Such devils exist, but they are rare. As I indicated earlier, much more often the intensely destructive person will show a front of kindliness; courtesy, love of family, of children, of animals; he will speak of his ideals and good intentions. But not only this. There is hardly a man who is utterly devoid of any kindness, of nay good intention.

… The naïve assumption that an evil man is easily recognizable results in a great danger: one fails to recognize evil men before they have begun their work of destruction… there are enough of them to be very dangerous if they attain influence and power. To be sure, not every destroyer would become a Hitler, because he would lack Hitler’s talents; he might only become an efficient member of the SS. But on the other hand, Hitler was no genius and his talents were not unique. What was unique was the sociopolitical situation in which he could rise; there are probably hundreds of Hitlers among us who would come forth if their historical hour arrived.

C.S. Lewis, the great twentieth-century theologian, makes a similar point:

I live in the Managerial Age, in a world of ‘Admin.’ The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid ‘dens of crime’ that Dickens loved to paint. It is not done even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern.

No one should suggest that Obama is a Hitler.  However, narcissism, including malignant narcissism, does not appear just in the person of a Hitler, a Stalin, or a Mao Tse-Tung.  It appears in a number of human beings on a graduated scale from bad to very, very bad to horrendous.

Keep reading here……..

**Emphasis added**

==========================

RELATED LINKS:

Is Obama’s Inner Ego Unraveling? In Obama’s need for Power and Admiration: Obama Says Republicans Showing Signs Of “Madness”…

===========================

Barack Obama imagery shows all the signs of a dictator.

====================

The Communist Slogan “Forward” now Adopted by Obama

=====================

America: IF the Obama Administration was Gun/Munitions Running from Libya and During 9/11 Attack the Benghazi Heroes Told to “Stand Down”…Thinks Four Americans were “Expendable”…How Does Obama View YOU? **UPDATES October 28, 2012**

======================

Communist Party USA Newsier: Ohio Unions and Obama…..Obama:”We Will Finish What We Started”…To Ohio Union Members and American Coal Miners: Pay Attention to the “Message”.

=======================

Shoe on the Other Foot: 15 Questions The (Liberal Biased) Mainstream Media Would Ask Barack Obama If He Were A REPUBLICAN

=============================

===========================================

BE CAREFUL AMERICA!

================

============================

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 337 other followers