RUSSIAN PRESIDENT MEDVEDEV SAYS HE WANTS OBAMA TO BE RE-ELECTED TO AVOID AMERICA’S “CONSERVATIVE WING”

=======================

Now WHY would a COMMUNIST President of Russia say this?

********************

via Atlas Shrugs

Posted by Pam Geller

June 20, 2011

RUSSIAN PRESIDENT MEDVEDEV SAYS HE WANTS OBAMA TO BE RE-ELECTED TO AVOID AMERICA’S “CONSERVATIVE WING

Obama meets Putin.bbmp

 

***Remember Vladimir Putin is EX-KGB***

Why wouldn’t the Russians want their advocate in the White House? They know Obama is out of his league, not negotiating in America’s self interest, and giving away the store. They have outplayed Obama (at the expense of our allies) more than once. Of course they want that quisling in the White House.

Russian President Medvedev Says He Wants Obama To Be Re-elected To Avoid America’s “Conservative Wing” (thanks to Weasel Zippers)

Along with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Hugo Chavez, ChiComs etc.

(AFP) — Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Monday he wanted his US counterpart Barack Obama to win re-election next year, fearing that the two men’s efforts to improve ties may lose steam under a new administration.

“I can tell you directly — I would like Barack Obama to be re-elected president of the United States maybe more than someone else,” Medvedev said in an interview with the Financial Times whose full transcript was released by the Kremlin early Monday.

“If another person becomes US president then he may have another course,” he said.

“We understand that there are representatives of a rather conservative wing there who are trying to achieve their political goals at the expense of inflaming passions in relation to Russia, among other things.

“But what use is criticising them? This is simply a way of achieving political goals.”

LINK

=======================

President Jimmy Carter Fails, Reagan answers the call

ANY of the above video SOUND FAMILIAR?

=======================

“The liberties of our country, the freedoms of our civil Constitution are worth defending at all hazards; it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors. They purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood. It will bring a mark of everlasting infamy on the present generation – enlightened as it is – if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of designing men.”

 -Samuel Adams”

==============

Russia Puts Off Final OK of START Treaty to January

===================

First, Russia tells America not to mess with the START treaty.  Any changes would nullify START.

Then Medvedev  said he applauds Obama’s push to pass START.

NOW the Russian have decided they will not consider ratifying the treaty until “at least January”

Russia Puts Off Final OK of START Treaty to January

December 24, 2010

Russian lawmakers gave preliminary approval Friday to an arms agreement with the United States, but signaled they would slow progress on the so-called New START treaty to a crawl after it was rushed through Congress earlier this week with some 11th-hour arm-twisting by President Obama.

The treaty cleared an initial hurdle through Moscow’s lower house of parliament, but a senior lawmaker said the treaty won’t get full approval until at least next month.

Konstantin Kosachev, head of the State Duma’s foreign affairs committee, said that the treaty would need a total of three required readings before it can be fully ratified. He said full ratification could only happen next month “at the earliest.”

The assessment seems to put the brakes on the document Obama called a top priority as he whipped up the Republican votes needed to pass it before the end of the lame-duck session.

The treaty, which was ratified Wednesday by the U.S. Senate, would limit each country’s strategic nuclear warheads to 1,550, down from the current ceiling of 2,200. It also would re-establish a system for monitoring and verification, which ended last year with the expiration of a previous arms control deal.

The pact is a centerpiece of Obama’s efforts to “reset” ties with Russia. In a phone conversation on Thursday, Russia’s President Dmitry Medvedev congratulated Obama on the Senate’s approval of the treaty, which the two leaders hailed as a historic event for both countries and for U.S.-Russia relations, according to a statement from the White House.

Speaking in a live interview with top Russian TV stations on Friday, Medvedev praised the pact as a “cornerstone of stability both on the European continent and the entire world for the next decades,” adding he was happy to see the Russian parliament moving ahead to ratify it. He credited Obama for securing the pact’s ratification.

“He did a great job, succeeding in his push for the ratification of this very important document, the New START in quite difficult conditions,” Medvedev said. “I told him: Barack, you have a rest now.”

Obama called the treaty a national security imperative and pressed strongly for its approval before the new Congress, with a Republican majority, assumes power in January. In recent days, he had telephoned a handful of wavering Republicans, eventually locking in their votes.

The Obama administration has argued that the United States must show credibility in its improved relations with its former Cold War foe. It is also counting on Russia to help pressure Iran over its nuclear ambitions.

When Obama and Medvedev signed the arms pact in Prague in April, they agreed to conduct ratification simultaneously. But Kosachev and other top Russian lawmakers said they need to study Senate legislation accompanying the treaty before making a decision.

Republicans had tried to kill the treaty by forcing changes in its language that would have sent it back for negotiations with Moscow. Democrats sought to appease some Republican senators by letting them raise these issues in legislation accompanying the treaty that would not directly affect the pact.

On Wednesday, two such amendments, one on missile defense and one on funding for the U.S. nuclear arsenal, passed with support from both parties.

Kosachev said that the Duma will likely counter the Senate legislation with legislation of its own.
“We don’t have the right to leave their interpretations unanswered,” Kosachev told reporters on Friday. “Otherwise it may give additional advantages to our American partners – or, possibly, opponents. We need to balance those advantages.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/24/russia-puts-start-treaty-january-early-approval/#ixzz192HZwkBO

==========================

START at http://thomas.loc.gov

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ntquery/D?trtys:4:./temp/~trtyshEhMG8::

==========================

Was the treaty a ploy by Russia to try to get the U.S. to remove the missile defense system in Europe?

Has ANYONE in the U.S. Senate asked RUSSIA why they wanted 50% interest in a Uranium company in Wyoming?

===========================

 

 

 

====================

We are not racist.

We are not violent.

We are just no longer silent.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 337 other followers