In True Politburo Fashion or Delusion of Grandeur? OBAMA TO CONGRESS: I DON’T NEED YOUR APPROVAL


Is Obama emulating NPD?

What is Narcissistic Personality Disorder?

The DSM-IV-TR, a manual that psychologists use to diagnose NPD and other mental disorders, explains that NPD is a type of psychological personality disorder characterized by grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy. Narcissism occurs in a spectrum of severity, but the pathologically narcissistic tend primarily be men (75%) who are extremely self-absorbed, intolerant of others’ perspectives, insensitive to others’ needs and indifferent to the effect of their own egocentric behavior. NPD is one of a cluster of loosely-related personality disorders (Borderline PD, Antisocial PD and Histrionic PD), all based on dramatic, emotional or erratic behavior.



Or is he building a Politburo RIGHT UNDER American’s noses via Cosa Nostra (mafia) style power?  After all Obama is from Chicago.

READ by clicking on blue letter links below.

Obama’s plan for America is President-assisted suicide. Is Obama Building A Politburo?

Obama-Labor Fascism Reported. Will YOU Read this America?


Is Obama Creating a Politburo Right Under American’s Noses?


Obama Building a Politburo; ONE step at a Time

What is Obama’s Chief Consumer Affairs Advisor Elizabeth Warren Hiding from Congress?

Obama has circumvented Congress and gave more power to the EPA.  See THIS CHART.


A Cosa Nostra (Mafia) Chart:

Cosa Nostra Chart


WHY ELSE would Obama make this statement/assertion to Congress?


By Billy Hallowell

June  15, 2011

Earlier today, The Blaze reported on the bi-partisan lawsuit that congressional members filed this week against the White House. Now, President Barack Obama’s administration is speaking out, claiming that the War Powers Act does not apply to U.S. action in Libya. The New York Times has more:

In a broader package of materials the Obama administration is sending to Congress on Wednesday defending its Libya policy, the White House, for the first time, offers lawmakers and the public an argument for why Mr. Obama has not been violating the War Powers Resolution since May 20.

On that day, the Vietnam-era law’s 60-day deadline for terminating unauthorized hostilities appeared to pass. But the White House argued that the activities of United States military forces in Libya do not amount to full-blown “hostilities” at the level necessary to involve the section of the War Powers Resolution that imposes the deadline.

“We are acting lawfully,” said Harold Koh, the State Department legal adviser, who expanded on the administration’s reasoning in a joint interview with White House Counsel Robert Bauer.

The administration claims that the U.S. has not been involved in “hostilities” since NATO took the helm on April 7. According to the White House, America is merely providing a “supporting role.” Since troops are not in harm’s way on the ground, they say there is “little risk” posed to U.S. forces. The Times continues:

The administration legal team considered other approaches, including a proposal to stop the use of armed drones after May 20 in order to bolster the case that United States forces were no longer engaged in hostilities. But the White House ultimately decided not to make any changes in the military mission.

The key issue here is the meaning of “hostilities,” as there does not seem to be a clear definition on the books. Furthermore, the administration discusses NATO as though the U.S. is not an integral part of the military alliance. In reality, the country’s relationship in the allegiance means that America is, to a degree, still heading operations in Libya.

Obama‘s opinion on this matter will likely be debated by congressional members on both sides of the aisle and judging from today’s lawsuit, there’s a good chance the battle may make its way into the court system.



In a recent tweet by Rep. Allen West:

AllenWest Allen West

White House says Libya doesn’t fall under War Powers Act b/c forces aren’t in harms way. Tell that to the wives of pilots flying over there



“We are acting lawfully,” said Harold Koh, the State Department legal adviser, who expanded on the administration’s reasoning in a joint interview with White House Counsel Robert Bauer.

Re: Harold Koh

Related Links:

Since WHEN does an International Group have the RIGHT to Interfere With Legislation in the United States Sovereignty?

The Obama/Harold Koh/Soros Connection


Obama’s latest most radical nomination yet: Harold Koh

JUDGES should interpret the Constitution according to other nations’ legal “norms.” Sharia law could apply to disputes in US courts. The United States constitutes an “axis of disobedience” along with North Korea and Saddam-era Iraq.

Those are the views of the man on track to become one of the US government’s top lawyers: Harold Koh.

President Obama has nominated Koh — until last week the dean of Yale Law School — to be the State Department’s legal adviser. In that job, Koh would forge a wide range of international agreements on issues from trade to arms control, and help represent our country in such places as the United Nations and the International Court of Justice.

It’s a job where you want a strong defender of America’s sovereignty. But that’s not Koh. He’s a fan of “transnational legal process,” arguing that the distinctions between US and international law should vanish.

The primacy of international legal “norms” applies even to treaties we reject. For example, Koh believes that the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child — a problematic document that we haven’t ratified — should dictate the age at which individual US states can execute criminals. Got that? On issues ranging from affirmative action to the interrogation of terrorists, what the rest of the world says, goes.

Including, apparently, the world of radical imams. A New York lawyer, Steven Stein, says that, in addressing the Yale Club of Greenwich in 2007, Koh claimed that “in an appropriate case, he didn’t see any reason why sharia law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States.

A spokeswoman for Koh said she couldn’t confirm the incident, responding: “I had heard that some guy . . . had asked a question about sharia law, and that Dean Koh had said something about that while there are obvious differences among the many different legal systems, they also share some common legal concepts.”

George Soros and Harold Koh are tightly woven together.  The Open Society is part of their agenda.

Even in George Soros’ The Age of Fallibility book, George Soros thanks Harold Koh for his input.


I benefited from a discussion at the Central European

University in Budapest with the following participants: Aziz

Al-Azmeh, Sorin Antohi, Andri Chassambouli, Yehuda

Elkana, Katalin Farkas, Eva Fodor, Janos Kis, Liviu Matei,

Daniel Monterescu, Prem Kumar Rajaram, Howard Robinson,

and Carsten Schneider; and an informal seminar in my

home with Leon Botstein, Rosa Brooks, Troy Duster, Hendrik

Hertzberg,      ****Harold Koh****,      Gara LaMarche, Deborah

Leff, Nicholas Lemann, Aryeh Neier, Peter Osnos, John

Podesta, Simon Rosenberg, Mark Schmitt, Jennifer Soros,

Jonathan Soros, and Michael Vachon.

PublicAffairs, and particularly its founder, Peter Osnos,

excelled as usual.

April 2006

George Soros


Re: Robert Bauer

Is a man known by the company he keeps?

Anita Dunn: Communications director: Exposed as a Mao Zedong admirer. Then stepped down, HOWEVER her husband,Robert Bauer, a former partner at Perkins Coie (law firm involved in the Obama birth certificate inquiry) is now personal counsel to Obama and is the White House counsel. (Link) (Link). Anita Dunn is actually credited with leading the charge of criticism of the Fox News Channel in 2009.

Robert Bauer and Anita Dunn (Spouse) in Obama’s White House. Nepotism? Or Political Protectionism? UPDATE! Bauer is “IN”


Executed December 15, 2009

Obama Executive Order Alters Your Legal Protections

With the signing of an under-publicized amendment to Executive Order 12425, Barack Obama has fundamentally altered your constitutional rights. His actions are undermining your rights to protect personal privacy from a foreign internationalist police agency named Interpol. A one-paragraph executive order may seem inconsequential to many, but this action has far reaching implications and threatens the sovereignty of America.

Obama’s secretive Executive Order amended an order issued by President Reagan in 1983. Reagan’s order recognized Interpol as an International Organization and gave it privileges and immunities commonly extended to foreign diplomats. Reagan opened the door to allow Interpol to operate in partnership with the U.S. but with significant constitutional safeguards. Specifically, Interpol’s property and assets remained subject to search and seizure by American law enforcement, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Interpol had to answer to the FBI and U.S. courts under Reagan’s order. These safeguards were stripped away by Obama’s action the week before Christmas without debate or explanation. Obama picked the holiday season to make this radical change to minimize media coverage.

This order marks a significant change in federal policy and usurps the constitutional power of our government by yielding it to an international organization. Michael van Der Galien writes, “This foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse. Property and assets, including the organization’s records, cannot now be searched or seized. Their physical operational locations are now immune from U.S. legal and investigative authorities.”

Obama has given an international organization unsupervised freedom to investigate Americans on our own soil without recourse or the supervision of our own government.

Andy McCarthy writing for the National Review asks some very significant questions: “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies?

Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?”

Interpol is the enforcement arm of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The United States never signed onto the Rome Treaty which created the ICC because of the potential for abuse by foreign interests. Obama has signaled he may sign the treaty over these objections and subject Americans to prosecution overseas in the ICC. This is harmful for two reasons. First, the U.S. Constitution clearly states that it is the supreme law of our land and allowing the ICC to supersede the U.S. Constitution violates America’s sovereignty. Second, the War on Terror is unpopular with Europeans and the ICC may attempt to prosecute heroic American soldiers with trumped up war crimes. Obama is putting brave American men and women at grave risk.

An added wrinkle to this executive order is that Interpol’s operations center for the United States is housed within our own Justice Department. Many of the agents are Americans who work under the aegis of Interpol. This order has potentially created the new civilian security force that Obama proposed during his campaign. This group of law enforcement officials is no longer subject to the restraints enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

The order guarantees that Interpol officers have immunity from prosecution for crimes they may commit in the United States. Ironically, some Interpol nations are attempting to try American intelligence agents for their work abroad in the War on Terror.

This order shows blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution.

Continue reading here……


Related Link:

Memo to the White House: Lawyer Up and Don’t Shred Documents



Will the Senate Pick Anti-Defense CIA Chief with Red Ties as SecDef? More Damaging Disclosures about Leon Panetta


Leon Panetta and The Manchurian Approach to National Security


Will our Congress wise up and realize that Obama is ensuring the demise of our Legislative branch?

Will our Congress STAND UP to Obama?

Do you believe Obama is just a puppet with a larger puppetmaster pulling the strings?

WHO is the puppetmaster?  Soros?  Hillary Clinton? Joel Rogers? John Podesta?

Is Valerie Jarrett Obama’s handler?



“The liberties of our country, the freedoms of our civil Constitution are worth defending at all hazards; it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors. They purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood. It will bring a mark of everlasting infamy on the present generation – enlightened as it is – if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of designing men.”

 -Samuel Adams”

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: