Ex-Cincinnati Union Prez Pleads Guilty To Embezzling $757,000

=========================

From Labor Union Report:

Posted September 22, 2011

Union President Pleads Guilty To Embezzling Funds
Ohio News Network
Sept. 21, 2011

CINCINNATI – A former Cincinnati union leader has pleaded guilty to federal charges related to the theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars from employees in the Cincinnati Organized and Dedicated Employees union.

Diana Frey, 51, entered the plea Wednesday morning of one count of wire fraud and admitted that she embezzled union funds between 2005 and June 2011.

Frey faced charges of embezzling more than $757,000 from the people she was supposed to represent. Frey was the head of the CODE union and an employee with the City of Cincinnati.

Read the rest @ Ohio News Network.

LINK

=================================

Related Link

     Ohio: State Workers Fear Pay Cuts

========================

Other Link:

The Five Million Dollar Man

How government unions rip off the taxpayer

Excerpt:

From the president’s hometown comes an example of what he is actually supporting. The Chicago Tribune reports that an investigation it conducted with WGN-TV found “23 retired union officials from Chicago stand to collect about $56 million from two ailing city pension funds.”

That’s an average of $2.4 million each, and some will rake in even more. Dennis Gannon, a former president of the Chicago Federation of Labor, stands to collect some $5 million. In line for $4 million apiece are Liberato “Al” Naimoli, president of the Cement Workers Union Local 76, and James McNally, vice president of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150.

============================

WHO actually benefits from Obama’s giveaways to the Unions?

The members?

OR the bosses?

Money distributed throughout Unions Cosa Nostra style?

=============================

Cosa Nostra Chart

Consigliere (Italian consigliere “counselor”, pronounced [konsiʎˈʎɛːre]) is a position in the American Mafia. The word was popularized by Mario Puzo‘s novel The Godfather(1969), and its film adaptation. In the novel, a consigliere is an adviser or counselor to the boss, with the additional responsibility of representing the don in important meetings both within the don’s crime family and with other crime families. The consigliere is a close, trusted friend and confidant, the mob’s version of an elder statesman. He is devoid of ambition and dispenses disinterested advice. This passive image of the consigliere does not correspond with what little is known of real-life consiglieri.[1]

A real-life Mafia consigliere is generally the number three person in a crime family, after don (boss) and underboss in most cases.[2] A crime family normally has only one consigliere at a time, but bosses have on occasion appointed more than one. The boss, underboss, and consigliere constitute a three-man ruling panel, or “Administration.”[3]

When a boss gives orders, he issues them in private either to the consigliere or directly to his caporegimes as part of the insulation between himself and operational acts.

LINK

********************

caporegime or capodecina, usually shortened to just a capo, is a term used in the Mafia for a high ranking made member of a crime family who heads a “crew” of soldiers and has major social status and influence in the organization. Caporegime is an Italian word, which is used to signify the head of a family in Sicily, but has now come to mean a ranking member, similar to captain or sergeant. In general, the term indicates the head of a branch of an organized crime syndicate who commands a crew of soldiers and reports directly to a boss or an underboss.

LINK

***************************

=================================

Worker Advocate Challenges Obama Labor Board Overreach in Federal Court

Mon, 09/19/2011 – 11:07 — Anthony Riedel

News Release

Worker Advocate Challenges Obama Labor Board Overreach in Federal Court

National Right to Work Foundation attorneys fight Labor Board’s decision to promote monopoly unionism in virtually every workplace in America

Washington, DC (September 16, 2011) – Today, National Right to Work Foundation attorneys filed a federal lawsuit challenging the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) new rules governing the notification of employee rights in the workplace.

The new rules require every employer to post incomplete information about employee rights online and in the workplace, even if they’ve never committed a violation or been accused of unfair labor practices. However, these rules do not require union officials to issue information about workers’ rights to refrain from union membership or opt out of union dues. Until the rule changes, which were implemented in late August, employers were required to post notices of workers’ rights only if a violation of labor law occurred.

National Right to Work Foundation attorneys believe the NLRB has exceeded its authority granted by Congress and violated free speech guarantees of the First Amendment.

More here………….

===================================

Is Obama Creating a Politburo Right Under American’s Noses?

 

March 23, 2010

 

This is a history of Russian Politburo formation.  Compare this to WHAT is happening today under Obama.

The Politburo, or Political Bureau, was the most important decision-making and leadership organ in the Communist Party, and has commonly been seen as equivalent to the cabinet in Western political systems. For most of the life of the Soviet system, the Politburo (called the Presidium between 1952 and 1966) was the major focus of elite political life and the arena within which all important issues of policy were decided. It was the heart of the political system.

The Politburo was formally established at the Eighth Congress of the Party in March 1919 and held its first session on April 16. Formed by the Central Committee (CC), the Politburo was to make decisions that could not await the next meeting of the CC, but over time its smaller size and more frequent meeting schedule meant that effective power drained into it and away from the CC. There had been smaller groupings of leaders before, but these had never become formalized nor had they taken an institutional form. The establishment of the Politburo was part of the regularization of the leading levels of the Party that saw the simultaneous creation of the Orgburo and Secretariat, with these latter two bodies meant to ensure the implementation of the decisions of leading Party organs, in practice mostly the Politburo.

————————————

***Note injected here:  The CPUSA, Communist Party of the USA was begun in 1919.***  There currently is a plan for the CPUSA Convention in New York this year to celebrate 90 years.

http://www.cpusa.org

Also a May Day demonstration planned:

http://peoplesworld.org/new-york-may-day-reborn/

————————————–

Continuing on:

From its formation until late 1930, the Politburo was one arena within which the conflict between Josef Stalin and his supporters on the one side and successive groups of oppositionists among the Party leadership was fought out, but with the removal of Mikhail Tomsky in 1930, the last open oppositionist disappeared from the Politburo. Henceforth the body remained largely controlled by Stalin. Its lack of institutional integrity and power is illustrated by the fact that various of its members were arrested and executed during the terror of the mid-to late 1930s. After World War II, the Politburo ceased even to meet regularly, being effectively replaced by  groupings of leaders that Stalin mobilized on particular issues and when it suited him.

While the frequency of Politburo meetings is somewhat uncertain for much of its life, it seems to have met on average about once per week in the Brezhnev period and after, with provision for a further meeting if required. Meetings were attended by all members plus a range of other people who might be called in to address specific items on the agenda. In addition, some issues were handled by circulation among the members, thereby not requiring explicit discussion at a meeting. No public differences of opinion between Politburo members were aired before the breakdown of many of the rules of Party life under Gorbachev, and public unanimity prevailed. It is not clear that votes were actually taken; issues seem to have been resolved through discussion and consensus. Whatever the process, the Politburo was the central leadership site of the Party and the Soviet system as a whole.

Bibliography

Laird, Roy D. (1986). The Politburo: Demographic Trends, Gorbachev and the Future. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Lowenhardt, John; Ozinga, James R.; and van Ree, Erik. (1992). The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Politburo. London: UCL Press.

http://www.answers.com/topic/politburo

============================

Obama has appointed nearly 44 Czars.  Many of which do not come under scrutiny of our own Senate for confimation.

https://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/alert-obama-czar-count-now-at-44-with-7-positions-being-planned/

Van Jones: Green jobs Czar.  An avowed Communist Maoist that resigned when his connections were exposed.  Now works at the Center for American Progress a leftist think tank headed by John Podesta.

Carol Browner:  Environmental Czar: Belongs to the Socialists International and the World Sustainability panel.  All connections were “scrubbed” from the internet when her connections were revealed.

Cass Sunstein:  Married to Socialist Samantha Power (friends with Mary Robinson, the founder of the Durban I Conference).  Sunstein is the author of “Nudge”.  If Americans cannot be nudged to follow Socialism; PUSH them.

Ezekiel Emanuel: Rahm Emanuel’s brother.  Author of the “Human Lives” curve.  Human “worth” only good between 25 and 45 years old.  Now a consultant for the Healthcare bill.

Ron Bloom: Manufacturing Czar.  Anti-Capitalist and Mao lover.  Do any of you find it disturbing that an Anti-Capitalist is in charge of the Manufacturing Sector?

=========================================

To view Obama’s Communist and Socialist connections go to:

http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama

http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_Communist_Party

http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_DSA

=================================================

Obama’s CZARS:

Yes, past presidents have had them in “advisory” positions, BUT Obama is utilizing them to set policies.  If Obama is using them to set policies, WHY hasn’t our own Congress jumped up and down and screamed about them?  Doesn’t our own Congress realize that the “plan” of our own government, via the White House is to create a layer of government around the White House in Cosa Nostra (mafia) fashion; as in a Politburo?

After all Obama is from Chicago.

Cosa Nostra (mafia) Chart Cosa Nostra (mafia) Chart 

Our own government has taken over a percentage of banks, insurance companies, now the auto industry, what is to STOP them from taking over our own CONGRESS?  In communist subversion, once complete; what has happened to the “legislative” and “judicial” branches?  They become obsolete and the members disappear.  Does our Congress; Republican, Democrat and Independent even think about this?  Are they just happy to receive the lobbyist money, the “fake power” only to find themselves painted in a corner with no exit strategy? 

==================================

If Congress denies passage of what Obama wants; he circumvents Congress with Executive Orders:

http://americansforprosperity.org/obamachart.php

==============================

Does any of this sound/look familiar America?

Will history repeat itself in the fashion of the American Revolutionary War?

Is Obama already planning on containing the uprising that is possible?

 

===============================

 

Obama’s “Consequence Management Response Force”

 

The brigade will not change its name, but the force will be known for the next year as a CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force, or CCMRF (pronounced “sea-smurf”).

[1]  There is a suspicious correction at the end of this article:  A non-lethal crowd control package fielded to 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, described in the original version of this story, is intended for use on deployments to the war zone, not in the U.S., as previously stated.

“…this is the first time that these modules were consolidated and this package fielded…because of this mission we’re undertaking we were the first to get it.”

And, why didn’t the BCT learn how to use “the first ever nonlethal package” during their 35 months in a war zone?  Why now?  The answer is, the Army needs lethal in a war zone.  It needs non-lethal at home. 

Read what the colonel said: 

 

The colonel’s “mission” is in the United States — does Obama now consider the homeland a “war zone?”

http://www.theobamafile.com

 

Playing the “Devil’s Advocate HERE”:

What IF Obama activates this force at his whim of what HE considers a “National Emergency”?

The National Guard has already been deployed to places…… even the Kentucky Derby.  

Military at Kentucky Derby
Military at Kentucky Derby 2009

 

WHO were they supposed to be protecting?  The Horses?

Or is this a test of America’s acceptance of the National Guard or National Security Forces being visual among the populace?

https://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/obamas-consequence-management-response-force/

 What ARE Obama’s plans for America?