Think Government Without Corruption Is Impossible? Don’t Be Too Sure

====================

============

From Canada Free Press:

By Jerry McConnell

January 28, 2012

**Eliminate the possibility for reelection and you eliminate all of the bad that accompanies it**

On Thursday, January 26, 2012, the wise, intelligent and extremely talented wordsmith, Thomas Sowell authored an article in the GOPUSA Eagle titled, “Sowell: Is Anybody Serious?” accusing the Republican candidates of being in a “circular firing squad” mode and in a particular damaging one using machine guns.

Sowell warned that “Whoever the eventual ‘last man standing’ turns out to be, he may not be standing very tall or very steadily on his feet—and he may be a pushover for Barack Obama in the general election, thanks to fellow Republicans.”

Is that what America, regardless of party affiliations, wants to see happen? I think not.  Four more years of Obama and his ‘way beneath the norm’ in matters of decency, loyalty to the country, and helpfulness to his fellow Americans would without question destroy any last vestiges or similarities to the once strong and fearless bastion of freedom that our Founding Forefathers envisioned and initiated back in the late seventeen hundreds.

After a short period of time into Obama’s second term we would more likely be prisoners without chains and shackles but with oppressive debt and poverty, groveling to his Administration and ministers of darkness under the oppressive overall yoke of United Nations One World Autocratic dictatorship.

That “last man standing” that Sowell envisioned after the constant suicide commentaries of, in particular, the two most acknowledged leaders, Gingrich and Romney or Romney and Gingrich as even the polls do declare that the only thing constant is the constant change in who has the lead and in what polls. Either of those two combatants will be in no condition to carry on and wage a knock-down, drag-out battle with the well rested and overflowing money chests of Obama and company.

Sitting back and observing the daily, and with the heavy number of prime time televised debates, demagoguery and accusations by both of those now recognized ‘last standers’, one has to wonder if this loss of human-ness, brotherly love and familial common decency is worth the expected prize of facing one of this country’s largest anti-American ideals and disparagement purveyors for the title of leader of a country that is on the edge of annihilation of its own accord.

What has changed our principles and morals and the values that holding public office once brought pride in accomplishing?  Greed and power lusts are certainly two prime responses to that question.  But greed for one just doesn’t seem to be a prime factor given the ample financial status of both candidates.  More money is always a magnet but my belief is that the given power that accompanies ascension to the lofty POTUS title and its world-wide notability and weightiness is the key premise of most presidential office seekers.

There is no doubt that many office seekers, especially in the area of ruling governance such as either house of Congress, know of the almost instant access to personal monetary accrual and the steady accumulation of such wealth as the length of service increases over the years.

The congressional office holders are among the wealthiest of Americans even if they didn’t start off that way and as their personal portfolios grow their effectiveness as legislators for all Americans dwindles while they reward the others most responsible for the size of their riches.  This is why cumulative reelections are mandatory for many, if not most, of our elected solons.

This seemingly ever cumulative and additional years entrenchment in the legislative offices of the federal government becomes the primary reason for deteriorative conduct such as outright theft, to multiple practices of deception and deceit and blatant corruption.

To guarantee prevalent status as a continuing congressperson or senator is the prime reason for “anything goes” from direct criminal activities, to lying, cheating and yes even stealing and coercion of anything with a possibility of helping to insure continuing reelection.

For proof or verification of what I say here ask if the politicians will make their financial records available for inspection of growth of income since taking office.  Or just ask if their accumulated wealth has substantially increased since they were first elected.  I think you’ll find that the answers are ‘yes’ to both question.

This country desperately needs TERM LIMITS on all elective offices, including the Presidency and Vice President.  The title should be changed to SERVICE LIMITS and the U. S. Constitution should be amended to provide for a SINGLE period of service not to exceed FOUR CONSECUTIVE YEARS.  The person elected to the office of the Vice President or any other federal elective office shall not be permitted to seek election to the higher office of president until a period of four consecutive years out of federal elective service has passed.

The single word “REELECTION” is the basis for all that is criminal and nefarious within the halls of elected government.  Eliminate the possibility for reelection and you eliminate all of the bad that accompanies it.

LINK

================================

RECOMMENDED READING:

Throw Them All Out

by Peter Schweizer

Description:

One of the biggest scandals in American politics is waiting to explode: the full story of the inside game in Washington shows how the permanent political class enriches itself at the expense of the rest of us. Insider trading is illegal on Wall Street, yet it is routine among members of Congress. Normal individuals cannot get in on IPOs at the asking price, but politicians do so routinely. The Obama administration has been able to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars to its supporters, ensuring yet more campaign donations. An entire class of investors now makes all of its profits based on influence and access in Washington. Peter Schweizer has doggedly researched through mountains of financial records, tracking complicated deals and stock trades back to the timing of briefings, votes on bills, and every other point of leverage for politicians in Washington. The result is a manifesto for revolution: the Permanent Political Class must go.

LINK

================================

========================================

We have term limits for President; why not Congress?

===============================

=====================================

While you were sleeping: Sneaky midnight-hour Senate moves; EduJobs rejected, Commerce nominee/solar subsidy mogul approved, Fannie/Freddie loan limits increased

===========================

================

From Michelle Malkin:

October 21, 2011

[T]he Senate (going on 900 + days without a budget) was up to all sorts of stealthy business in the midnight hour.

As of 1:28am, the Senate was casting procedural votes on the FY 2012 federal spending bill.

Guess what else they did?

They approved the nomination of solar subsidy king and eco-radical John Bryson.

Details on that vote:

John Bryson, confirmed by the U.S. Senate as Commerce secretary, will take a leading role in the Obama administration’s efforts to reduce an unemployment rate stuck above 9 percent and push to double U.S. imports.

Bryson, 68, the former head of Edison International in California, replaces Gary Locke, who became U.S. ambassador to China in August. The Senate vote last night on Bryson, who Obama chose at the end of May, was 74-26, with 21 Republicans and two independents joining all the Democrats in support.

Here’s the roll call vote

Guess what else they did? They paved the way for more Fannie/Freddie taxpayer crutches:

The U.S. Senate adopted a measure that would raise the maximum size of a home loan backed by mortgage companies Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration to $729,750.

Senator Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, offered the increase as an amendment to a spending bill today. The measure was approved less than a month after the limit on so-called conforming loans was automatically reduced to $625,500.

“If we want to get the economy moving, the housing market has to be part of it,” Menendez said tonight on the Senate floor.

The Senate adopted the amendment 60-3[8]. The amendment required 60 votes for approval and was offered during the chamber’s consideration of a package of spending measures. If the Senate passes the underlying bill, the House would then have to vote for it to become law.

The higher limits, should they be signed into law, would apply until Dec. 31, 2013. Lawmakers would pay for the cost of the higher limits by imposing an annual fee on the loans of 15 basis points of the unpaid principal balance of the mortgage.

Keep reading here………..

================================

So much for the most OPEN, TRANSPARENT government Evah………

====================================

The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.

Alexis de Tocqueville

***************************

If the above in not the BEST REASON for term limits for Congress……What IS?

***********************************
******************************

Congressional Republicans Begin Planting Hit Jobs on Conservatives

====================

By Erick Erickson

Wednesday, March 16th

First the House GOP required Democrats to get their three week continuing resolution passed — a continuing resolution that cuts less money than the interest on our national debt that will accumulate over the next three weeks.

Then the House GOP started bad mouthing the conservatives who voted against their plan.

Now the House GOP is launching a direct assault on . . . wait for it . . . conservatives.

One reporter called me today. He is a long time acquaintance for a national newspaper. In shooting the breeze he dropped the names of leadership staffers pushing several of the hit jobs.

Unfortunately, though he named some names I’d already guessed, I can’t share them. But he said so many phones are burning up with hit jobs being planted I can write what I wrote because it will be impossible to trace back to him.

Then there is this from the Daily Caller.

One GOP aide unloaded on the conservatives, offering a more colorful view privately held by many other Republicans.

“These people aren’t thinking clearly. Their logic doesn’t pan out. They have NO plan. What concessions were they going to get if it failed? They were going to shut down the federal government over Planned Parenthood?” the source said, “It was totally reactionary. These people got elected to lead. Instead they got jerked around by the political equivalent of music critics. If these people knew anything about governing, they’d be in Congress, not lobbing bombs from the cheap seats and sending out fundraising emails.”

The aide offered contempt for Pence in particular. “Pence is running for governor, and has to get through a primary, so his position is about as genuine as a $10 Gucci hand bag on Sunset Boulevard.”

I’ll first point out that Eric Cantor is well known to wear Gucci loafers. Second, I will pass comment on the sexual orientation of whoever came up with the Gucci hand bag line. Third, I would like to ask exactly whose side these Republicans are on.

See, I’m on the side of smaller government and more freedom. These House Republicans seem to be in favor of smaller government in the abstract, just not in the real world.

They’re attacking Heritage Action for America, Club for Growth, Family Research Council, Mike Pence, and any other conservatives who dare to actually make them live up to their own Pledge to Nowhere. We conservatives have a plan. We just want the House Republicans we elected to find their testicles and run the ball down the field. [Emphasis added]

By the way, the House aide said, “If these people knew anything about governing, they’d be in Congress.” Actually, (1) Mike Pence is in Congress, (2) Chris Choccola was in Congress, (3) Tony Perkins was in the Louisiana State Legislature, and (4) unlike the House Aide, I have actually run and won elected office as a conservative. So, the House aide throwing shots is the only one in the picture who has never been elected to anything!

In fact, I think that makes this House aide akin to a prostitute — getting money from a congressman to perform cheap tricks. The rest of us are standing up for our convictions instead of selling out.

***Written by Erick Erickson***

LINK

=======================

The Congressional (good ‘ol boys) Republicans think the Tea Party (Conservatives) are NOT a formidable opponent.

The Congressional Republicans DID NOT actually digest the election results of November 2, 2010.

The Tea Party are CONSERVATIVES.

The Tea Party are Republicans, Democrats and Independents that want smaller government, freedom and liberties. NOT THE BUSINESS AS USUAL that has been occurring in Washington, D.C. for YEARS.

If NOTHING ELSE screams TERM LIMITS for Congress…….this does.

=======================

“Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem.”

~~Ronald Reagan~~

=========================