Doing the Job the Failed MSM’s Won’t Do: WHO Really IS Obama?

========
====================

“We have nothing to fear, but fear itself”

*************

Obama has spent MILLIONS to secrete all his records at Perkins Coie.

Does Obama have ties to Perkins Coie?

Robert Bauer, the Obama 2012 campaign general counsel is a partner at Perkins Coie and was working as personal counsel to Barack Obama.

LINK

 **Note: Bauer is married to Anita Dunn, The White House communications director until outed as a Mao admirer.  Is she back running the “Truth Squad” for Obama?

***********************

Obama’s records including school, his Social Security number, etc. have been secreted and protected by Perkins Coie (Law group with which one of its lawyers, Robert Bauer(married to Maoist admirer Anita Dunn) is one of Obama’s chief legal advisors at the White House.

Bauer has done his best to prevent the American public from seeing a wide range of Obama’s records that could prove, or disprove, his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the Constitution’s requirement that the president be a “natural born” citizen.

Documents concerning Obama that the White House has refused to release to the public include his long-form birth certificate and his passport records, as well as other records that may possibly be relevant, such as records regarding Obama’s possible adoption by his Indonesian stepfather or college application and tuition financial aid records which would reveal whether Obama was ever registered as a foreign student.

Federal Election Commission records show $1,352,378.95 in payments were made by Obama for America to Perkins Coie while the law firm was representing Obama in various court cases which have sought to obtain Obama’s long-form birth certificate to determine if he is a “natural born” citizen under Article Two, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Bauer, a Democratic Party partisan, has a long history of defending Democratic Party presidential hopefuls.

A biography for Bauer posted on the Perkins Coie website indicates he was general counsel to the Democratic National Committee during the presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry and that he served as counsel to Sen. Tom Daschle, the Democratic leader in the impeachment trial proceedings of President Bill Clinton.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer functioned as an “attack lawyer,” threatening with FEC complaints groups wanting to run anti-Obama television ads.

Also during the 2008 presidential campaign, Bauer as counsel for the Obama campaign wrote letters to television station managers and to Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General John Keeney arguing that airing an anti-Obama ad pointing to the known association between Obama and Weather Underground radical Bill Ayers would violate federal election rules.

Also during the 2008 campaign, Bauer intervened on behalf of Obama to block the California-based American Leadership Project from running a television ad campaign over support from unions, including the Service Employees International Union.

Again, Bauer filed a complaint with the FEC alleging that the union-funded television campaign the American Leadership Project planned to run in Indiana against Obama was illegal under federal election laws.

More here…..

====================

Today, the firm, Perkins Coie has a near-stranglehold on some of the biggest Democratic political accounts in town; it represents the party’s two congressional committees — the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — as well as the individual campaigns and political action committees of many Senate Democrats.

And Bauer landed the mother of all accounts — Obama’s presidential campaign — even before the campaign officially began, which led to his being appointed this year to the coveted position of lead counsel for the Democratic National Committee, a position that also made him the lawyer for Obama’s political network, Organizing for America.

Plus, he represents Obama and his family in personal matters, such as the federal investigation of disgraced former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, but Bauer’s number one priority is to keep Obama’s bona fides hidden from the American People.

Bauer is married to recently resigned White House Communications Director, Anita Dunn.

Continue reading here . . .

===================

Obama Waives Ethics Rules For Counsel

Kenneth P. Vogel says that when Bob Bauer replaced Greg Craig last year as White House counsel, it seemed inevitable that he’d be working on some of the same issues he had in his previous job as Obama’s personal and campaign lawyer.  So late Friday afternoon, in recognition of that reality, the White House issued Bauer a waiver to ethics rules established by Obama that prohibit officials in his administration from working on issues affecting their former clients for two years.

Those rules would have prevented Bauer “from performing roles that someone in the Counsel’s position ordinarily performs” and, therefore, neither “make sense” nor are they “in the public interest,” wrote White House ethics lawyer Norm Eisen in a post on the White House blog.

Eisen, who works under Bauer and wrote the waiver, stressed that it is limited, applying only to Bauer’s work at the powerhouse Democratic firm Perkins Coie as a private lawyer for the Obama family, and for the Democratic National Committee.

Bauer also served as the top lawyer for Obama’s presidential campaign and his confluence of positions made him a powerful member of Obama’s inner circle as well as the most influential Democratic election lawyer in town until he replaced Craig in November.

Perkins Coie — which paid Bauer $959,000 in 2009 and still owes him $216,000 — continues to represent Obama’s presidential campaign, as well as the Obama family and the DNC. In the latter two capacities, the firm is involved in helping Obama fill out his personal financial disclosure statement, which is due next week, and in fighting a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee seeking to overturn laws prohibiting huge “soft money” donations to political parties.

Bauer is expected to advise the White House on those matters, and a White House official pointed out that in both cases Bauer’s private work is consistent with Obama’s stances in favor of disclosure and reducing the influence of special interest money in politics.

The waiver notes that Bauer is “a leading national authority on campaign finance and related matters and the government will benefit greatly from his expertise,” but the White House official said Bauer hadn’t advised Obama on campaign finance litigation prior to the waiver.

Obama touted his ethics rules as the toughest ever, but his administration has been criticized by Republicans and independent government watchdog groups for issuing waivers to it.  But there wasn’t any immediate criticism Friday evening over the Bauer waiver.

“This is precisely the type of situation in which an ethics waiver is appropriate,” said Craig Holman, an ethics and campaign finance lobbyist for the non-profit watchdog group Public Citizen.  “The conflict of interest requirements are intended to prevent business interests from capturing the regulatory agencies that oversee them,” said Holman, adding that “is not an issue here, and so a waiver for Bauer is appropriate.”

Added Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and an occasional White House critic: “I don’t see a problem. Basically, I think the president is entitled to have the counsel he wants.”

There is no mention in this article of Bauer’s primary role — Robert Bauer is Obama’s eligibility lawyer — and, as of May 8, 2010, the Obama Campaign has disbursed $2,161,155.11 to Perkins Coie.  His job is to prevent the American People from seeing this stuff.

LINK

===================

The Washington Post is reporting that Barack Obama’s top lawyer at the White House is resigning to return to private practice and represent Obama as his personal attorney and as general counsel to Obama’s re-election campaign.  The move means that Bauer, 59, will still play a central but outside role in advising a president who is seeking re-election in a time of divided government.

Bob Bauer will be replaced by his top deputy, Kathy Ruemmler, (No stranger to WH; she was a lawyer working to defend Bill Clinton/Lewisky matter) a former assistant U.S. attorney best known as lead prosecutor in the Enron fraud case.  The 40-year-old Ruemmler will take over the job as Obama’s top in-house counsel and manager of a White House law office charged with juggling the domestic, national security and congressional oversight challenges confronting the president.

In a statement, Obama praised Bauer as a friend with exceptional judgment who will remain a close advisor.  As to his new White House-based counsel, Obama said: “Kathy is an outstanding lawyer with impeccable judgment.  Together, Bob and Kathy have led the White House Counsel’s office, and Kathy will assure that it continues to successfully manage its wide variety of responsibilities.”

Bauer has been part of Obama’s circle since Obama was a freshmen senator in Washington, and now returns to the campaign counsel role he had when Obama ran in 2008.  He has long been a go-to lawyer for Democrats on matters of political law and is married to the well-known Maoist, Anita Dunn, a Democratic communications operative who formerly worked in Obama’s White House.

Bauer will leave his White House post at the end of June.  In a style typifying the low-key nature of transitions in the counsel’s office, the news came in the form of a press release.

Bauer’s job is to keep Obama out of court and keep his bona fides hidden from the American People.

Bauer is now the “outside guy.”  He has more flexibility operating from “private practice” than he does operating as White House Chief Counsel.  Ruemmler still works for him.  She’s the “inside guy.”

LINK

===========================

White House Counsel Bob Bauer Resigns to Return to Campaign (June 2011)

=========================

Obama Campaign Disbursements To Perkins-Coie

The following is information was compiled from the official Federal Elections Commission (FEC) website for disbursements from the Obama campaign to Robert Bauer’s law firm of Perkins Coie, which represents Obama in various eligibility suits.  The FEC links follow the entries.Note:  When the queries return their results, search the table on “Perkins”All Filings  by OBAMA FOR AMERICA — C00431445

Year End, 2011, FEC report for Obama for America

Perkins Coie: $168,367.29
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2011/YE/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

3rd Quarter, 2011, FEC report for Obama for America

Perkins Coie:  $248,953.65

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2011/Q3/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

 2nd Quarter, 2011, FEC report for Obama for America

Perkins Coie:  $101,838.31

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2011/Q2/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

1st Quarter, 2011, FEC report for Obama for America

Perkins Coie:  $165,008.20

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2011/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

Note:  The above query is now failing, but the number is what the FEC reported earlier this year.  I have reported it to the FEC.

Carlos Luna, of the FEC, responded and says a candidate must be an Active (Declared) Presidential Candidate before the deadline of a particular report (Q1, Q2, …etc) for their report summary totals to display here.  The Q1 (while it was previous displayed) was removed, because The Obama for America first quarter report was filed before the Obama statement of candidacy was filed.

Year End, 2010, FEC report for Obama for America

Perkins Coie:  $241,422.79

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2010/YE/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

3rd Quarter, 2010, FEC report for Obama for America

Perkins Coie:  $234,284.82

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2010/Q3/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

2nd Quarter, 2010, FEC report for Obama for America
Perkins Coie:  $248,483.94

http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/501/10930598501/10930598501.pdf#navpanes=0

1st Quarter, 2010

Perkins Coie:  $261,206.69

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2010/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

October 2009 quarterly:
Perkins Coie:  $314,018.06
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q3/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

July 2009 quarterly:
Perkins Coie:  $270,754.18
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q2/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

April quarterly
Perkins Coie:  $688,316.42
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.htm

Year-End 2008
Perkins Coie:  $173,052.52
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/YE/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

Amended post-general election:
Perkins Coie:  $205,323.00
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/30G/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

Total to date: $3,321,030.17

LINK

=========================

Another TIE to Perkins Coie:

David Brock of Media Matters is also the Treasurer for American Bridge 21st Century.  The email address for American Bridge 21st Century?  Perkins Coie.  Political Law Group of Perkins Coie. WHY doesn’t it go directly to American Bridge 21st Century?

************

Related Link:  David Brock is Founder of Media Matters AND American Bridge 21st Century (**Also listed as Treasurer**). Ties to the White House?

========================

================

Executed December 15, 2009

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-amending-executive-order-12425

Obama Executive Order Alters Your Legal Protections

Excerpted:

Specifically, Interpol’s property and assets remained subject to search and seizure by American law enforcement, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Interpol had to answer to the FBI and U.S. courts under Reagan’s order. These safeguards were stripped away by Obama’s action the week before Christmas without debate or explanation. Obama picked the holiday season to make this radical change to minimize media coverage.

This order marks a significant change in federal policy and usurps the constitutional power of our government by yielding it to an international organization. Michael van Der Galien writes, “This foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse. Property and assets, including the organization’s records, cannot now be searched or seized. Their physical operational locations are now immune from U.S. legal and investigative authorities.”

Obama has given an international organization unsupervised freedom to investigate Americans on our own soil without recourse or the supervision of our own government.

LINK

================================

While YOU were Busy Watching GOP Candidate Rivalries: Warning! Progressives’ NPV Plan for White House Control, 2012 & Permanently

==============================

============================

WHY is Obama afraid for Americans to find out who Barack Obama really is?

====================

=============================

#Vet Obama 2012

==========================

================================

David Brock is Founder of Media Matters AND American Bridge 21st Century (**Also listed as Treasurer**). Ties to the White House?

=============

=====================

First Media Matters:

David Brock Founder and CEO.

From Big Journalism:

Who’s Giving Cash to Media Matters for America?

By Ben Shapiro

February 17, 2012

The Daily Caller, continuing its yeoman work in exposing the Democratic scam that is Media Matters for America, has a comprehensive piece out today running down the list of donors to MMFA since 2003.  Here’s what they came up with:

  • The Tides Foundation, a George Soros-backed left-wing group, donated just under $4.4 million (although Soros’ cash for Tides was earmarked for other purposes).  Soros wasn’t done yet, though – his Open Society Institutes donated another $1.1 million.  Chalk up one for the international money-man socialist.
  • The Ford Foundation gave nearly $1 million – an especially odd funding choice, given the fact that the Ford Foundation is supposed to be about charitable causes rather than political ones.
  • The Sandler Foundation, headed up by subprime mortgage lenders Herb and Marion Sandler, handed over $400,000.
  • Even MoveOn.org – remember when they were relevant? – forked over $50,000.
  • Celebrity nitwit Barbra Streisand’s foundation gave the group $85,000; celebrity uber-nitwit Norman Lear’s foundation handed over $55,000, too.
  • And, of course, the Joyce Foundation – a group on whose board one Barack Hussein Obama sat from 1994 to 2002 – gave $400,000, too.

Overall, it’s clear that MMFA is at the forefront of a network of like-minded “charitable organizations” passing the hat for the Democratic Party worldview.

=======================

Peter B. Lewis of Progressive Insurance also a donor to Media Matters. Muckety Map: http://www.muckety.com/Media-Matters/5024728.muck… 

David Brock is also the founder of American Bridge 21st Century Another SuperPac.

http://www.americanbridgepac.org/ 

******

American Bridge 21st Century

“super PAC” formed Nov. 23, 2011 [FEC] and 501(c)(4)
“American Bridge 21st Century is a progressive research and communications organization committed to holding Republicans accountable for their words and actions and helping you ascertain when Republican candidates are pretending to be something they’re not.”

Founder  David Brock

Founder (May 2004) and CEO of Media Matters for America.  Renounced conservative ties in 1997 (Esquire “Confessions of a Right-Wing Hit Man”).  Investigative writer for The American Spectator.  Editorial page editor at the Washington Times.  Writer and senior editor at Insight magazine.  B.A. in history from UC Berkeley, 1985.  Author of five books.

LINK

*****************

Muckety Map of American Bridge: 

http://www.muckety.com/American-Bridge-21st-

Information about American Bridge 21st Century SuperPac: FEC filing

AMERICAN BRIDGE 21ST CENTURY

700 13TH STREET, NW, SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C004921… 

Read full FEC report on American Bridge 21st Century HERE

****

***NOTE***

In the FEC filing, David Brock is listed as the Treasurer.  The founder of the organization is ALSO THE TREASURER?

Is this so David Brock can funnel money from Media Matters into American Bridge 21st Century without questions being asked about this?

****************

Look at the email address for Amer. Bridge 21st Century: PLGroup@PerkinsCoie.com

http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?_119314… 

Perkins Coie is the Lawyer group that has been protecting Obama from birthers and those looking for his school/SS records. Obama’s Chief White House Counsel, Robert Bauer is from Perkins Coie.

Interesting…..No?

LINK

=======================

Re: Robert Bauer

Is a man known by the company he keeps?

Anita Dunn: Communications director: Exposed as a Mao Zedong admirer. Then stepped down, HOWEVER her husband,Robert Bauer, a former partner at Perkins Coie (law firm involved in the Obama birth certificate inquiry) is now personal counsel to Obama and is the White House counsel. (Link) (Link). Anita Dunn is actually credited with leading the charge of criticism of the Fox News Channel in 2009.

Robert Bauer and Anita Dunn (Spouse) in Obama’s White House. Nepotism? Or Political Protectionism? UPDATE! Bauer is “IN”

*********

Why did Obama move Robert Bauer (married to Mao lover Anita Dunn; previous advisor in White House) into the Chief legal advisor position?  Robert Bauer is from Perkins Coie, the law firm that was fighting those wanting birth certificate records. Anyone dare to ask?

Read this:

Federal Election Commission records show $1,352,378.95 in payments were made by Obama for America to Perkins Coie while the law firm was representing Obama in various court cases which have sought to obtain Obama’s long-form birth certificate to determine if he is a “natural born” citizen under Article Two, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Bauer, a Democratic Party partisan, has a long history of defending Democratic Party presidential hopefuls.

A biography for Bauer posted on the Perkins Coie website indicates he was general counsel to the Democratic National Committee during the presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry and that he served as counsel to Sen. Tom Daschle, the Democratic leader in the impeachment trial proceedings of President Bill Clinton.

LINK

==========================

=================================

From Muckety:

By Laurie Bennett

February 13, 2012 

Call it “political archaeology.”

When wealthy donors want to help dig dirt about the right, they often turn to American Bridge 21st Century.

Roll Call describes the super PAC as “the opposition research hub of the Democratic fundraising apparatus.”

The committee was founded by David Brock, a reformed conservative who started Media Matters, a group that monitors Fox and other conservative media.

The PAC, in turn, follows Republican and conservative politicians. When Sen. Scott Brown attacked Senate hopeful Elizabeth Warren on earmarks, the PAC published his own promise to “continue to bring home the pork.”

American Bridge videographers track GOP candidates around the country, hoping to capture any “macaca” moments.

The PAC reported raising $3.7 million and spending $2.9 million last year.

The above Muckety map shows some of the most generous, most connected contributors. (We recommend looking at the larger version, where you have more room to expand and move relationships.)

Major donors include two bundlers for the 2012 Obama campaign – Wayne Jordan and Paul Egerman.

Unions such as the AFL-CIO, AFSCME and SEIU have also supported the PAC’s efforts. Other contributors come from the entertainment, tech and financial sectors.

Several heirs are also on the list, including Agnes Gund, former president of the Museum of Modern Art, Anne Earhart of the Getty family and Robert McKay of the Taco Bell fortune.

=======================

===========================

Of interesting note:

Media Matters claims to be a 501(c) 3 organization. LINK

American Bridge 21st Century claims to be a 501(c)4 organization. LINK

Comparing 501(c)3s and 501(c)4s

501c3 and 501c4 organizations are very similar in many respects. In fact, any organization that qualifies for a 501c3 tax-exemption would also qualify for a 501c4. There are, however, important differences.

Non-profit status:

    • Both 501(c)(3)s and 501(c)(4)s must be run as not for profits.
    • Neither 501(c)(3)s nor 501(c)(4) earnings may benefit a private shareholder or individual.

Tax-exemption:

  • Both 501c3 and 501c4 organizations are exempt from paying federal income tax. State tax-exemption status varies by state.

Lobbying (trying to affect legislation):

  • 501(c)3s are limited in the amount of time and/or money they can put into lobbying.
  • 501(c)4s can do an unlimited amount of lobbying (but then become ineligible to receive federal monies like grants).

Political campaign activity:

  • 501(c)3s cannot in any way support or oppose anyone running for public office, though they may be involved in political campaigns by way of non-partisan public forums, voter registration drives, etc.
  • 501(c)4s can engage in political campaign activity, so long as this is consistent with the organization’s purpose and is not the organization’s primary activity.

Charitable Donations:

  • Donations to 501(c)3s are deductible to the full extent of the law.
  • Donations to 501(c)4s that are public entities (ie, state, local governments, volunteer fire stations) are deductible if they are used for public services. Donations to other 501(c)4s are not deductible.

Should your organization be a 501(c)3 or a 501(c)4?

If you are planning on doing limited or no lobbying and no campaigning, then you probably want the 501(c)3 tax-exemption so that people can benefit from donating to your organization (unless you represent the state or a political subdivision thereof). However, if your organization will be doing substantial lobbying or any campaigning, you should form a 501(c)4.

If you want the best of both worlds, you can have two separate but affiliated organizations – one a charitable 501(c)(3) and the other a 501(c)(4). Many trade organizations lobby extensively on behalf of their members, but have an affiliated 501c3 foundation for charitable giving.

LINK

=======================

RELATED LINKS

Obama and White House Colluding with Media Matters? Propaganda “Truth Squad” enters stage Left.

****************

White Noise Polluting American voters. It doesn’t Matter What is True; it only Matters What People Believe is True….

********************

Attack on First Amendment Rights or Goebbel’s Style Propaganda at Work via Media Matters?

*******************

Liberal Biased Media on Display: Media Plays Up GOP Association, Hides Dem Connection In Two Similar Stories

**********************

Context-Challenged Media Doesn’t Tell Full Story About Obama’s Fourth-Quarter Fundraising

***********************

Anita Dunn talking about the White House controlling the media:

=================

=========================

================================

It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true…You are what the media define you to be.” (Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Watson).

==========================

=================================

====================================

New York Times FAILS to Mention Gingrich Was Cleared Of Ethics Charges. While YOU were Busy Watching GOP Rivalries: Warning! Progressives’ NPV Plan

=====================

===========

From Big Journalism:

By John Sexton

January 29, 2012

This is what real journalism looks like, folks. Sheryl Gay Stolberg writes a 2,300 word piece about Newt Gingrich’s relationship to ethics charges (those brought by and against him) that ends with this rehash of his fall from grace:

In the end, nearly all of the charges were dismissed. But the ethics committee did find that Mr. Gingrich had used tax-exempt money to promote Republican goals, and given the panel inaccurate information for its inquiry.

Mr. Gingrich formally apologized, conceding he had brought discredit on the House. He had always   regarded himself as a “transformative figure” who would change the course of history, but on Jan. 21, 1997, he made history in another way.

The House voted 395-28 to reprimand him and fine him $300,000, making him the first speaker ever disciplined for unethical conduct.

That’s it. That’s how the tale ends. It’s as if they’ve quoted Newt’s history but added an invisible ellipsis over the final portion of the story. This is a doctored quote of the record. This is “agenda journalism.”

Do you think it’s relevant that after the events described above Democrats campaigned for a further investigation? Is it relevant that the IRS took them up on it, and that after more than three years determined that Newt did nothing wrong? Simply put, all the charges, even the ones Newt was reprimanded for, were bogus. Is any of that worth mentioning in a front page story on the topic at the New York Times?

The real journalists at the NY Times have simply decided their readers don’t need to know the rest of the story.

LINK

=============================

WHY doesn’t an MSM ask Obama:  WHY are his school records, social security records, Harvard Law School writings being sequestered at Interpol?  Or why Obama pays THOUSANDS of dollars a year for lawyers to protect his history?

RELATED LINKS:

Assploding Hypocrisy: Obama Campaign Rips Romney For Refusing To Release Records…

*********************

Executed December 15, 2009

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-amending-executive-order-12425

Obama Executive Order Alters Your Legal Protections

Excerpted:

Specifically, Interpol’s property and assets remained subject to search and seizure by American law enforcement, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Interpol had to answer to the FBI and U.S. courts under Reagan’s order. These safeguards were stripped away by Obama’s action the week before Christmas without debate or explanation. Obama picked the holiday season to make this radical change to minimize media coverage.

This order marks a significant change in federal policy and usurps the constitutional power of our government by yielding it to an international organization. Michael van Der Galien writes, “This foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse. Property and assets, including the organization’s records, cannot now be searched or seized. Their physical operational locations are now immune from U.S. legal and investigative authorities.”

Obama has given an international organization unsupervised freedom to investigate Americans on our own soil without recourse or the supervision of our own government.

LINK

================================

While YOU were Busy Watching GOP Candidate Rivalries: Warning! Progressives’ NPV Plan for White House Control, 2012 & Permanently

==============================

Robert Bauer and Anita Dunn (Spouse) in Obama’s White House. Nepotism? Or Political Protectionism? UPDATE! Bauer is “IN”

===============================

The Pro-Obama biased, protectionist MSM’s the likes of the New York Times are bloviating about the “One”, but WHERE are the true Muckrakers when it comes to actually looking into Obama’s background?

Paid off?

Intimidated?